"The editors" continue with an accusation whose boomerang effect surprisingly escapes them:
The divisive effects of the new American sectarians have not escaped the notice of the Vatican. Their highly partisan political edge has become a matter of concern. That they never demonstrate the same high dudgeon at the compromises, unfulfilled promises and policy disagreements with Republican politicians as with Democratic ones is plain for all to see. It is time to call this one-sided denunciation by its proper name: political partisanship.
A call to both civility and to leave behind partisan politics is certainly needed. But “the editors” seem to forget that such a call has no effect whatsoever when it:
-
Comes from someone who not only calls fellow Catholics “sectarian” and “heretic,” but has been consistently defended doctrinal positions that would make all the holy men who attended councils from Nicaea to Trent blush.
-
Comes from someone who has been rightly perceived as embarrassingly bending over to the other political party.
Of course, if "the editors" of “America” have the chutzpah to tell the bishops what to do in matters pertaining to priestly formation, no one should be surprised if they come up with a “solution” that suits their own ideological bias.
Four steps are necessary for the U.S. church to escape the strengthening riptide of sectarian conflict and re-establish trust between universities and the hierarchy. First, the bishops’ discipline about speakers and awards at Catholic institutions should be narrowed to exclude from platforms and awards only those Catholics who explicitly oppose formal Catholic teaching. Second, in politics we must reaffirm the distinction between the authoritative teaching of moral principles and legitimate prudential differences in applying principles to public life. Third, all sides should return to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council and Pope Paul VI that in politics there are usually several ways to attain the same goals. Finally, church leaders must promote the primacy of charity among Catholics who advocate different political options.
Let’s skip "the editors’" naïve superficiality in thinking that their four truisms can actually solve the deep reef of U.S. Catholicism.
More significant is the fact that “America’s” editors are so convinced that they are above the fray, that they actually believe they have the power and credibility to call together “all sides” as if they were not one of “them.” Whoever is not aware of the radical nature of “America” magazine should go to their blog and look at the postings of Mr. Winters.
Moreover, "the editors" think that “church leaders must promote the primacy of charity among Catholics,” but they surely do not believe that this would include them being reprimanded for calling the most vital, vibrant and youthful part of American Catholicism heretical and sectarian.
A call of this nature, which basically means “you are bad and mean because you don’t think like me” is not surprising, coming from “America.”
What is surprising is that “the editors” think that someone is taking them seriously.
--Alejandro Bermudez
(Column continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter