According to Norman Hearst, an epidemiologist at the University of California who conducted a scientific review at the request of UNAIDS to see if condom promotions had reversed HIV/AIDS epidemics, “Condom promotion in Africa has been a disaster.” Uganda, on the other hand, has experienced the greatest decline in HIV prevalence of any country in the world. From 1991 to 2001, Uganda’s HIV infection rate declined from 15% to 5%.
Of course, if UNAIDS, which paid for the investigation, refused to publish Hearst’s findings, how could anyone ever expect Joanna England, or the New York Times to ever mention it?
Third: Joanna, Can you actually quote the Pope or any other Church official saying that condoms are “the problem?” Why don't we bet real money on it? The Pope, along with many other Church leaders, has continually insisted that condoms are NOT the solution, but rather part of a life-threatening scam that hails sex with a condom as “safe sex.” However, it has been sufficiently proven that placing condoms at the core of an AIDS prevention campaign leads to failure. That’s quite different from saying that condoms are “the problem.”
Anyone who reads the real statement of the Pope will actually find that he not only dismissed the whole “condom issue” with which the media seems to be obsessed, but that he laid out a plan to fight AIDS that is both realistic and demanding.
“Is the Vatican, fresh from a major mea culpa about a certain Holocaust-denying bishop, making another mistake? Or is Benedict sticking to his guns on Catholic doctrine?”
No Joanna, those are not the questions to ask. The questions are: Are you and the likes of the NYT ever going to offer a mea culpa about obsessively promoting a policy on AIDS that is actually killing real people? Or are you going to stick to your guns on secular dogmas?
Alejandro Bermudez