Canadian bishops' report: Mexican aid partners ‘imprudent’ but not pro-abortion

News Resources Tools Columns Documents ACI Group

Contenidos del sub-menu

Comments: 4

Archbishop Weisgerber, President of the Canadian Bishops' Conference

Ottawa, Canada, Jun 30, 2009 / 05:39 pm (CNA).- An investigating committee with the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) has released its report concerning allegations a CCCB-affiliated agency was supporting pro-abortion groups in Mexico concluding that the charges were unfounded but deeming the groups in question to be “imprudent.”

The Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace (CCODP) was accused of distributing funds to five organizations that support the legalization of abortion and the distribution of contraceptives in Mexico.

The CCCB’s Committee of Inquiry made a visit to Mexico in April after which it rejected the allegations that Development and Peace projects there provided financial assistance to projects related to the promotion of abortion.

However, the committee said the five organizations in question were imprudent in signing a United Nations report on human rights in Mexico that included “orientations not in accord with Catholic teaching,” the CCCB stated.

A fact-finding report issued by the committee said the United Nations report in question represented a “sum total of all the recommendations of 50 Mexican human rights organizations.”

“Each organization presented its own views without necessarily consulting the others. This is why some of them, by their signature, now appear to accept what the others had presented,” the report said. Some organizations “took advantage of this opportunity” to add “sexual and reproductive rights” to the document, hoping to “open the way to abortion” and leading to the initial allegations against the five groups.

The report also noted a 2007 legal debate in Mexico about whether to oppose imprisonment as a punishment for abortion. According to the report, some Catholic groups “claimed that to be in favor of abolishing imprisonment for abortion meant promoting abortion and not being pro-life.”

“Development and Peace does not fund projects that support or promote abortion,” the report concluded.

The committee also issued recommendations in response to the charges, asking the CCODP to be “more vigilant” in demanding information from possible partners and in ensuring “more thorough” consultations with bishops appointed to its national council. It also asked that the organization foster “good relations” between its partners and the episcopal conferences of the countries in which they are located.

The committee also advised that Development and Peace, a group founded by the Canadian Catholic bishops, be encouraged to develop a “good and sound understanding” of Catholic social doctrine.

It then endorsed a “frank and transparent dialogue” between the bishops of Canada and LifeSiteNews, the pro-life news site which reported the allegations about Mexican CCODP partners.

In a Monday statement about the inquiry, CCCB President Archbishop James Weisgerber explained that the dialogue recommendation came because the committee and the CCCB Permanent Council are “deeply concerned about the series of public allegations, accusations and denunciations that were the reason for the Committee of Inquiry to be established this past March.”

“This is an important moment in the life of the Church in Canada,” Archbishop Weisgerber said. “On behalf of my brother Bishops, I urge all Catholics, in the words of Saint Paul, not to ‘bite and devour one another,’ but ‘to restore one another in a spirit of gentleness,’ and so ‘to work for the good of all, and especially of the family of faith.'

Other allegations linger about CCODP financial involvement with pro-abortion groups in Peru, where a local archbishop has said there was “no doubt” three such groups were funded by the Canadian organization.

Comments: 4

Subscriber comments:

Published by: Dan in Calgary
Calgary Alberta Canada 07/01/2009 09:24 PM EST

Bishop Fred Henry of our Calgary Diocese recently published an article slamming a Calgary gold mining company for what in his view were reckless gold mining practises in the Philipines. The basis for his article was evidence that was very thin in comparison with that against D&P.

That he is still a staunch defender of D&P in the face of the evidence that is surfacing makes it clear that his first concern is secular leftist politics, while the spiritual welfare of his flock and the physical welfare of the thousands murdered before birth in his diocese are distant second priorities.

Dan in Calgary

Published by: JLS
Riverside, CA, USA 06/30/2009 11:59 PM EST

This Archbishop's credibility is toast. There is too much evidence published already that he flies in the face of.

Published by: Doug
Portland/OR/USA 06/30/2009 10:07 PM EST

Catholics please do your research. CCODP is just another front group for Catholics that support abortion and liberation theology. Archbishop Weisberger should understand that this group does not respect his authority. They will profess their love as long as the money flows from Canadian Catholics to their schismatic organization. Always question that second collection at Mass. Know where the money is going, defend your faith.

Published by: Robertz
KY,USA 06/30/2009 07:44 PM EST

The reason why the Canadian bishops claim this is that Development and Peace was the one who lead the investigating bishops on a tour down in Mexico. Lifesitenews readers were already preparing for a whitewash after learning that D&P was to be leading it. There is no doubt that D&P has been funding organizations that work against Church teaching. The bishops of Peru know this also. After the initial reporting by LSN, many independents have confirmed what was reported. It has also long been found that other groups outside of Mexico have been receiving funds from D&P that shouldn't be, but have so far been ignored by the Canadian conference including the previously mentioned ones in Peru in which those bishops asking D&P to stop have not received a response as far as I know. Many readers looked at the webpages of many of these groups and found out for themselves that they were proabortion among other anti-catholic activities. A few of these have altered their websites to hide, but LSN has retained copies of them.

ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):


NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:

PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:

* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.

ADVERTISING
CNA does not necessarily endorse these advertisers. Please proceed with discretion. If you feel that a website announced has inappropriate or offensive content, please send it by e-mail to catholicna@catholicna.com