|
|
||||||||
|
Long-delayed Illinois parental notification law blocked by restraining order
Related articles:
.- A judge has issued a temporary restraining order on the enforcement of a 1995 Illinois parental notification requirement for minors who seek abortions. Supporters of the law said the decision means Illinois will remain an “abortion dumping ground” for minors wanting to avoid other states’ restrictions. On Wednesday afternoon Cook County Judge Daniel Riley said he felt the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which sought the order, had “demonstrated the distinct possibility of irreparable harm,” the Associated Press reports. Thirty-five other states have similar laws, but Illinois has been delayed by various court actions. This means some teens seeking abortions come to Illinois to escape nearby states’ notification laws. "This is a dumping ground for other states," commented Joseph Scheidler, national director of the Pro-Life Action League. "You go look at the license plates at the abortion clinics." Lorie Chaiten, head of the Illinois ACLU’s reproductive rights project, claimed that the law would allow young women to be abused. Chaiten also cited the case of one young woman who was abandoned by her mother after she refused to have an abortion. Assistant Illinois attorney general Thomas Ioppolo argued against the restraining order, asking "Why does Illinois have to have a law that doesn't take the parents into account?" “The idea of having parental notification serves legitimate interests," he said. Earlier on Wednesday the Illinois Medical Disciplinary Board had voted not to extend a 90-day grace period. A spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation said that the board’s vote meant the law had gone into effect, but Judge Riley’s ruling bars the department from enforcing it. Thomas Brejcha, president of the Chicago-based Thomas More Society, called Illinois "an island of abortion in the Midwest." A press release from the Thomas More Society said that its attorneys are “reviewing their options” after the decision. Its attorneys will return to court on Nov. 19 to argue in favor of the Society’s continued involvement in the case. The law requires doctors to notify the parents or guardians of girls 17 or younger before the teens undergo abortions. The law does not require parental consent, but requires 48 hours notice before an abortion. The law requires no notice in a medical emergency or in cases of sexual abuse. A provision allows girls to bypass parental notification by going to a judge. Subscriber comments:
Published by: bjcass
mooresville,nc 11/06/2009 02:11 PM EST
Ron Giles - you suggest fear is used by pro lifers to deny "services that can be truly helpful to both the teen and the baby." Unless I`ve misread your comment,I can`t grasp how a dead infant benefits from an abortion.There is no law that delays or prohibits a minor from consulting and talking with anyone they wish,including Planned
Parenthood.The only clear,sharply focused issue is can a minor elect to have an abortion without the parents having the opportunity to be aware and to counsel their own child.
Published by: Ron Giles
Valrico, Fl 11/06/2009 10:11 AM EST
The judge agreed to a restaining order base on the fact that the ACLU "demonstraed the distinct possibility of irreparable harm". Pro abortion advocates fear that the teen who can not get an abortion on demand would be greatly harmed because they would become desparate enough to have the abortion completed illegally thus putting themselves at great risk. The pro abortion group would rather use fear to justify the end whether then using those services that can be truly helpful to both the teen and the baby.
Published by: bjcass
mooresville,nc 11/06/2009 08:46 AM EST
To deny a parent the right to advise or counsel their own child is a travesty.The ACLU and the secular humanists are intent on destroying the family.If we don`t become activists to challenge our politicians,liberal judges,and groups like the ACLU,it will get worse.Abortion is the sacred sacrament of the left.Watch how it is weaved into the Democrat sponsored health care legislation.
Published by: William James, PhD
Sacramento/ CA/USA 11/06/2009 02:20 AM EST
Obviously, we should pray for all those who are accountable for the issuance of this restraining order, and also pray that the order be lifted as soon as possible. Judicial affronts like this to the legislative will of the people have been going on for far too long. The US is a pluralistic mosaic, and whether our opponents like it or not, we, too, are part of this mosaic just as they are.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
09:07 pm | CNN poll finds 61% of Americans oppose government-funded abortions 08:02 pm | USCCB: Senate health care bill 'morally unacceptable' 05:54 pm | Mexican expert: Don’t believe false 'end of world' Mayan prophecies 02:36 pm | Expert explains upcoming battle over pro-abortion Senate health care bill 01:22 pm | Fourteenth Fort Hood victim forgotten Related news :
Supporters of Illinois parental notification law claim ‘great victory’ as it takes effect Pharmaceutical company cites Vatican document to defend its use of aborted baby Second 10,000 Masses for Unborn Novena to take place in January Church cannot remain silent when human life is in danger, says Peruvian bishop Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||
