Loading
Bishop: San Diego City Council stand against Prop. 8 would be divisive
Bishop: San Diego City Council stand against Prop. 8 would be divisive
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest Addthis

.- Salvatore Cordileone, auxiliary bishop of the San Diego diocese, has written to San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders and the San Diego City Council as the council considers on Monday a resolution concerning whether the city will officially oppose Proposition 8. The bishop’s letter argued that passing the resolution would not represent the consensus of San Diegans and would weaken the family.

“We need to be supporting and strengthening the institution of marriage for the sake of children, not redefining and weakening it,” he wrote.

Bishop Cordileone’s letter, dated Oct. 21, 2008, was republished by the California Catholic Daily.

He began his letter by saying: “Those of us who favor preserving marriage as the union of a man and a woman in California are wondering what ever happened to our democracy.”

Citing the 61 percent of voters who in 2000 passed Proposition 22, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman, Bishop Cordileone charged that the will of this majority was overturned by the California Supreme Court earlier this year.

“Defining marriage as it has been understood in every society since the beginning of the human race is hardly the stuff of which unconstitutional laws consist,” the bishop wrote.

Many people, “trusting in the democratic process,” had expended “vast resources of time, energy and capital” to pass Proposition 22.

The bishop mentioned that the California attorney general had not only refused to stay the Supreme Court decision which overturned Proposition 22, he had “in an unprecedented move,” changed the title of the proposition after its qualification for the ballot in a way that “prejudices” the wording.

Bishop Cordileone also decried the repeated theft of “Yes on 8” signs and the severe beating of a Proposition 8 supporter in Modesto.

“And yet, not a peep from our elected officials decrying this violence and intolerance,” he commented.

Noting how he had previously written a letter to the city council stating that the issue was divisive, he commented: “The experience over this last year has more than adequately demonstrated that it is true.”

Saying that the San Diego city council could speak for the entire city, the bishop asked whether council members had surveyed area residents.

“How can you presume to speak for the entire city when a majority – or at least, a very sizeable minority – is in favor?” he asked.

“Why are our thoughts and feelings not worthy of equal consideration to theirs, especially when we can offer many rational, cogent arguments to justify our position? We support marriage because marriage benefits everyone; we abhor violence and unjust treatment against people who disagree with us. Nonetheless, we are accused of discrimination. Who, though, is being discriminated against now?” the bishop continued.

Bishop Cordileone noted how the city had changed for the worse, witnessing a decline of safety and a decline in secure home life for children.

“What, though, can be a greater benefit to children and young people than growing up with their mother and father married to each other in a low-conflict relationship? We need to be supporting and strengthening the institution of marriage for the sake of children, not redefining and weakening it.”

After charging that same-sex marriage intentionally deprives children of a mother and a father, he appealed to the council members to defeat the resolution opposing Proposition 8.

“After having made such laudatory and inspired commitments to our youth, please, do not now sell them down the river by telling them that it’s not important for them to have a mother and a father.

“Please do not divide our community any more bitterly than it already is. Please do not betray the trust the public has placed in you. Please do not disenfranchise those who worked so hard to give Californians the opportunity to decide,” he concluded, asking that the democratic process be allowed to work.

Ads by AdsLiveMedia(What's this?)

* The number of messages that can be online is limited. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages

RESOURCES »

Ads by Google (What's this?)
Ads by Google

Featured Videos

Little Sisters of the Poor press conference in Denver
Little Sisters of the Poor press conference in Denver
Family thrilled to see Pope Francis in Istanbul
Syrian Refugee, Sara, 14, Before Meeting Pope
Ebola orphans thousands of children in West Africa
One year after Haiyan: Philippines rebuilds homes, lives
An Indian contribution to the Vatican's Synod on the Family
Christ Cathedral CNA video Sept 2014
Alejandro Bermudez of CNA accepts ice bucket challenge
'The Real Albania,' remembering those who fled
Pope Francis in Albania, "one of the most important visits of the post-communist era in Albania"
Pope Francis greets paralyzed man who risked all to see him
Franciscans on the banks of the Tiber in Rome, working for the New Evangelization
Pilgrimage from Czech Republic to Assisi and Rome for intentions
Testimony of young Indian who met Pope in Korea
Preparations of the Closing Mass of 6th Asian Youth Day
Missionary of Charity, Korea
Testimony of Christian Love during Pope's Visit to Korea
Religious Sisters in South Korea react to Pope Francis kissing a baby
Warm atmosphere during Holy Mass at Daejeon World Cup Stadium
Images inside Pope Francis flight to South Korea
Dec
18

Liturgical Calendar

December 18, 2014

Advent Weekday

All readings:
Today »
This year »

Catholic Daily

Gospel of the Day

Mt 21:23-27

Gospel
Date
12/15/14
12/14/14
12/13/14

Daily Readings


First Reading:: Jer 23: 5-8
Gospel:: Mt 1: 18-25

Saint of the Day

St. Romuald »

Saint
Date
12/15/14

Homily of the Day

Mt 21:23-27

Homily
Date
12/15/14
12/14/14
12/13/14