|
|
||||||||
|
Bishop slams V-monologues at Notre Dame as propaganda, “spiritually damaging”
![]() Bishop John D'Arcy of Fort Wayne--South Bend
Related articles:
.- John D’Arcy, Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend, has responded to the decision by the president of Notre Dame to allow the performance of the Vagina Monologues, calling the play “pornographic” and “spiritually damaging.” “As bishop of this historic diocese, entrusted with the spiritual welfare of all those who live within its borders, including the students at our beloved Notre Dame, I believe that, once again, I must publicly and respectfully disagree with Father Jenkins’ decision,” Bishop D’Arcy said, in a written statement posted on the website of the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend. Bishop D’Arcy said that he and university president Father John Jenkins, CSC, had been in communication about the president’s decision to allow the play. “Father Jenkins has informed me that, while he thinks that this play is a bad play, he believes that permitting its performance under certain conditions, namely, in an academic building without fundraising and with a panel discussion afterwards in which the Catholic perspective is represented, is consistent with the identity of a Catholic university.” According to Bishop D’Arcy, Father Jenkins compared the performance to the reading in Notre Dame classrooms of Nietzsche, Gibbon, Luther and Joyce, who in various ways put forward ideas contrary to Catholic teaching. Bishop D’Arcy said the difference between works by famous authors and this play is “a difference, not of degree, but of kind.” He explained that the former had written serious philosophical, theological, and literary works that have influenced Western thought. Therefore, their work has academic merit and is worthy of classroom discussion. “Father Jenkins believes that Eve Ensler’s play was written to shock and offend,” Bishop D’Arcy wrote. “How can one put such a play, which many consider pornographic, on the level of serious works such as the writings of Gibbon and Luther?” The bishop made a distinction between reading and criticizing a play in class and attending the performance of a play. “One generally goes to a play and leaves; staying afterwards to listen to a panel discussion about the play is not inherent in the activity of attending a play,” Bishop D’Arcy said. “No one who comes to the play is required to stay for the panel discussion, and Father Jenkins’ attempt to give the performances of this play an academic quality seems deficient.” He also said the play performances constitute an endorsement of the “international V-day campaign,” whose agenda is “directly opposed to the dignity of the human person and is antithetical to Catholic teaching.” The bishop said that the reason some Notre Dame students and departments sponsored the event was because they supported the campaign. He said in his statement that, “…people push to have this play performed year after year because they endorse the message it conveys, and they want to be part of the international campaign to promote this message.” Bishop D’Arcy also criticized the play’s scheduling for Holy Week, saying, “If this play is performed on the dates scheduled, it will be held during Easter week, the holiest time of the church year… Surely Notre Dame will not prefer or even seem to prefer the requirements of the V-Day campaign to the proper observance of Easter.” Making an analogy between the play and Nazi propaganda, Bishop D’Arcy said that just as a Catholic university in Nazi Germany should not have shown propaganda films, a Catholic university in the modern United States should not support modern propaganda. Speaking of a hypothetical Catholic university in Nazi Germany, Bishop D’Arcy asked, “Would not the university bear moral responsibility for the fact that some students who viewed the film on campus might be persuaded by the propaganda and became Nazi supporters?” The bishop explicitly called the Vagina Monologues a work of propaganda. “The play is little more than a propaganda piece for the sexual revolution and secular feminism,” he said. “While claiming to deplore violence against women, the play at the same time violates the standards of decency and morality that safeguard a woman’s dignity and protect her, body and soul, from sexual predators.” He called the play’s performance “pornographic and spiritually harmful.” He also said the play “depicts, exalts, and endorses” the sins of female masturbation, a sexual relationship between an adult woman and a child (which, he also noted, was a crime), and “the most base form of sexual relationship between a man and a woman.” He said these sinful actions are portrayed in the play as paths to healing, implying that heterosexual marriage is the wrong from which people need to recover. Bishop D’Arcy said that the overriding issue in the controversy is moral, and if the play is performed it should be denounced. “Otherwise,” he said, “the university appears to endorse it as in some way good and the impression is given that Catholic teaching is one option competing among many. This method places faith in a defensive position and on the margin and is unacceptable at a Catholic university.” The bishop cited Ex Corde Ecclesiae, Pope John Paul II’s 1986 address to intellectuals, students, and university faculty, as a reason to refuse to allow performances of the play. Bishop D’Arcy said Catholic universities were made distinctive because “we start from the truth that has been revealed to us in the Word of God, the person of Jesus Christ, and the teaching of His Church.” He said the idea that truth will emerge from a discussion in which many points of view are represented both “disrespects revealed truth” and “separates the search for truth from the certainty of faith.” “A decision not to sponsor the play is not only consistent with academic freedom but is a right use of such freedom for it shows respect for the truth, for the common good and the rights of others,” Bishop D’Arcy said. The bishop encouraged Father Jenkins to reconsider his decision to allow the play for this year and for future years. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Kyriel
PA 01/28/2009 07:50 PM EST
I'm guessing that none of you have actually seen the Vagina Monologues. I am also guessing that not many of you know what the purpose of the monologues are. They are the actual words of women interviewed by Eve Ensler. It wasn't this crazy idea that Ensler came up with to shock and abhor people. In order for something to be propaganda, according to the rhetorical definition of propaganda, it must directly be trying to make people change their lifestyles or beliefs. Vday was made to bring awareness to domestic violence and raise money to help those affected by it. This show is a very honest look into a woman's mind and soul and should be seen before one makes a judgment about it. Some topics in the show are indeed questionable, but aren't we not exposed to questionable topics/images/ideas everyday? The show isn't saying, "being a lesbian is great but you have to be with a younger woman and you must masturbate regularly" as the article assumes. The article itself can be considered propaganda in many ways so perhaps an open mind would be a better option. Just because it doesn't go along with your beliefs doesn't mean someone else doesn't believe in it.
Published by: Peter Mahmood
Forest Park,Georgia,USA 03/15/2008 03:06 PM EST
The bishop should contact the new Father general of the Jesuits to ask that this Jesuit be disciplined.If nothing else we would find out if anything has changed with this order or if its business as usual. I regretfully came to the conclusion some years ago that the Jesuit order should be disbanded by the Holy Father.
Published by: Ethel
Bismarck ND 03/14/2008 06:00 PM EST
I agree with everyone! Thank you Bishop D"Arcy for sticking to your guns and being vocal. But if Fr . Jenkins refuses to listen he should be removed . And Alumni should stop funding this. It is not longer giving a Catholic education .Alumni who fund it and continue to fund it are as much in the wrong as Jenkins who they are backing by giving funds .
Published by: John
Minneapolis, MN 03/14/2008 05:26 PM EST
All talk and no teeth! I like what he says, but without punishment then how is Fr. Jenkins going to know Right from Wrong?
I'm not sure how exactly Bishop D'Arcy could punish Fr. Jenkins. He is not under is authority. Look at St. Louis where Coach Majerus and St. Louis U. basically thumbed their collective noses at Archbishop Burke. If he can't do it I don't see how anyone else could either. Both schools are outside direct Diocesan control.
Published by: Lee
Oswego, IL 03/14/2008 03:45 PM EST
Has it escaped the Bishops attention that his job is to shepherd this priest. The Ten Commandments are not suggestions!! He should TELL Father Jenkins to stop this travesty or face the consequences. This is a scandal and must be stopped.
Published by: Hope F.
VA/USA 03/14/2008 03:32 PM EST
Does this bishop have no real authority over this priest? He IS in his diocese. OR is he not under his authority at all? He is in some religious order, no? Couldn't the head of that order forbid this happening.
It is ludicrous to call Notre Dame Catholic anymore. I think it should change its name. Maybe the Pope should step in and put a stop to this, or does he have no authority over the Prez of N.D. either?!
Published by: Peter Hart
USA 03/14/2008 12:28 PM EST
Father Jenkins has lost his roots. He seems to have a confused notion of "Catholic" education and has distored, if not ignored, "Ex Corde Ecclesiae." I wonder if he took an oath, sorry, promise of obedience at ordination.
Published by: Col. Richard L.Quinn
Belton, Texas 03/14/2008 11:40 AM EST
Thank God our Bishops are finally demonstrating the leadership to speak out against garbage like this. Bishop D'Arcy, I salute you!! Father Jenkins you must resign for the good of the Church.
Published by: Warren Anderson
Victoria, BC, Canada 03/13/2008 09:18 PM EST
The good bishop is right on the mark. The V-Monologues is a propaganda piece, and it is weak theatre. The work is of such low artistic merit that only controversy enables it to receive any attention at all. The action to allow such a work to be presented during Holy Week, no less, is an indication of just how far Notre Dame has drifted from its Catholic sensibilities, let alone a concern for artistic merit. If ND wants to show pornography, then they should stop calling themselves a Catholic university and use another name: perhaps “Lilith U.”? In the meantime, benefactors should be made aware of the University’s intentions and be encouraged to stop supporting the University while it allows the presentation of schlock that appeals to those with a prurient curiosity.
Published by: Stephany
Weslaco, TX, USA 03/13/2008 08:52 PM EST
Bravo, Bishop. What on earth is going on in the minds of these so called "intellectuals" and a priest, besides?Whose side is he on? It surely does not sound like a Catholic University and truly when I hear Notre Dame, I no longer think of it being Catholic, but rather "liberal and lost". Our Blessed Mother has warned us of what is happening now in Her apparitions throughout the world.We need to stand up and support our Bishops when they speak out against this nonsense.
Published by: Chris R
Mercer Island, WA 03/13/2008 07:31 PM EST
All talk and no teeth! I like what he says, but without punishment then how is Fr. Jenkins going to know Right from Wrong?
Does he need to take a philosophy class again or maybe he should read GK Chesterton on Orthodoxy.
Published by: Joe Vengalil
Detroit, MI 03/13/2008 05:54 PM EST
If ND allows this play to take place, ND alumni should immediately cease providing funds to ND or the religious community administering it. The University President should be disciplined for his actions.
Published by: Susan
Canada 03/13/2008 02:55 PM EST
I think Father Jenkins should be removed from his position as president of this university. and I think he should kneel before our Lord Jesus and beg His foregiveness and spend the rest of his life atoning for this. Father Jenkins is a very bad ambassador for Christ (priest) and all these so-called priests who have no holiness in them should be removed from the public's eye. We have had enough bad publicity in the past few years. Our Lord deserves better then this. and the Bishop...who is the authority..should take immediate Action!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
10:03 pm | Pro-abortion lobbies ‘incensed’ at Stupak deal to pass health care 01:04 pm | Over 1,500 attend Philadelphia men’s conference 12:34 pm | Post office rate hike on mailings critical of homosexuals in the military overruled 11:05 am | Jesus is Justice in person, declares Benedict XVI at Angelus 07:50 am | Knights of Columbus rallying against ‘immoral' Philippines contraception campaign Related news :
University of Notre Dame president approves V-monologue performances Notre Dame awards Laetare Medal to Martin Sheen Coalition urges Catholic colleges to avoid hosting pro-abortion politicians Catholic college faces legal complaints after forbidding abortion health plan Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

