Briefs filed in New York same-sex ‘marriage’ recognition case
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

New York City, N.Y., Aug 29, 2009 / 07:24 am (CNA).- The Thomas More Society of Chicago has filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the New York State Catholic Conference concerning whether N.Y. should recognize out-of-state same-sex "marriages" that have been contracted in states which recognize the practice.

The Thomas More Society’s brief argues that recognition of such unions would undermine a natural and social institution and is not required by New York precedents governing the recognition of out-of-state marriages.

"A lower court said that New York state can recognize an out-of-state same-sex marriage, which does not make sense. A marriage that violates the public policy of New York state should not be recognized, regardless of where it was entered into, period," Tom Brejcha, president and chief counsel for the Thomas More Society in Chicago, said in a statement.

Brejcha characterized the lower court’s decision as an "aberrant departure" from governing law.

"New York's Court of Appeals has already handed down a definitive ruling in 2006 that the state's public policy, as set forth in its Domestic Relations Law, clearly provides that the state prohibits marriage between members of the same sex. Furthermore, under New York state law, the state is not required to recognize out-of-state marriages that could not be legally performed in New York state," he continued.

Richard E. Barnes, director of the New York State Catholic Conference, said the state’s Catholic bishops have "consistently supported" efforts to defend marriage from redefinition efforts.

Barnes said that marriage has always been defined as "the enduring union of one man and one woman, ordered for the procreation of children and the mutual support of the husband and wife."

"The New York State Court of Appeals has previously ruled that state law defines marriage in this way, and that the state has a legitimate interest in prohibiting so-called 'same-sex marriage'," he added.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: JONES-MUNOZ
EAST ELMHURST/NY/USA 08/29/2009 11:35 PM EST
I was not raised as a Roman Catholic.  I was raised an Episcopalian, my religious beliefs are different, My religious faith is inclusive, and my Church has decided to include same-sex marriage rites.  So when it comes to the debate of same-sex marriage I am offended when I hear of the Roman Carholic Bishops in New Jersey, or The Roman Carholic Church funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to defeat the civil rights of same-sex couples to exersize those rights,  To use their argument, as proposed by the Irish Cardinal of Limmerick Ireland, they are committing, "an alarming attack on the fundamental principle of freedom of religion and conscience."  They are trying to dictate their religious values upon me, They are attempting to dictate my religious faith, and they are attempting to inhibit my civil rights under the law.  To be clear about this, we do not live under a religious theocracy but a nation were equality prevails under the constitution, whether Protestant, Catholic, Muslim, Budhist or Jew.  I strongly oppose their tactics to push their religious values upon me because mine is of love and inclusion.
Rate this comment:
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa