|
|
||||||||
|
Brother of Terry Schiavo claims 'lies' are still being spread about her
Related articles:
.- Nearly five years after the death of his sister Terri Schiavo, Bobby Schindler has said that the general press is still “telling lies” about her. Schindler explained his perspective and said that news accounts “refer to Terri as being brain dead.” “I see that all the time,” he continued, “ and it simply is not true. They say that she was on artificial life support, without explaining to people what artificial life support means. There's this perception out there that Terri was on a machine – that people like Terri need machines to keep them alive.” “It's still being reported by the mainstream media,” Schindler told CNSNews.com on Thursday. “There's things that are being said that were simply not true.” Terri Schiavo died in March of 2005 when a Florida judge ordered the removal of her feeding tube, a move that was requested by her then husband, Michael Schiavo who had custody of her. The case made headlines and was the subject of a public feud on right to life issues. Terri's parents, Robert and Mary Schindler had fought for two years to try and prevent their daughter's death. Bobby Schindler claimed that the autopsy report following his sister's death showed that she was in good physical shape when her feeding tube was removed, and that the pathologist indicated that Terri could have “quite easily lived a normal life span.” “Terri died because we took away her food and water,” Schindler stated, “just like we would all die if our food and water was taken away.” “It took almost two weeks.” According to Schindler, the media continues to report that Terri was brain-dead, that she was on artificial life support, and that she was unresponsive and blind. “These are simply not factually correct,” Schindler stated to CNSNews.com. “It's patently false. If Terri were alive today she could be here to 'March for Life' with us. All she needed was a wheelchair, and we could have taken her anywhere. But there's the perception out there that these people basically need to be bed-ridden, and that they are unable to be taken anywhere. It's just not true.” “If you go on YouTube, or go on MySpace, and put my sister’s name in there and see all the horribly offensive things that come up, and how she’s made fun of,” he continued, “it frightens me, because of what exists in our culture today and how we view people like my sister and people with cognitive disabilities.” “I think we’re being taught to look at these people as burdens, as inconveniences, instead of what I believe they are – as gifts. They allow us to show our compassion, our love. I believe that they are blessings.” Subscriber comments:
Published by: Constance
CT/USA 01/25/2010 12:58 PM EST
Michael in PA - I was watching the case thoroughly, heard her nurses, her husband, doctors, family, the courts, those politicians trying to help her. Her brother is correct. She was not connected to a machine. She had a feeding tube and could receive water. Her husband already was with another woman and had children by her. He wanted nothing done for her, the nurses sneaked antibiotics when she had an infection. The courts and the lawyer he hired were on the side of euthansia. He wouldn't let her parents see her. The cops stood guard so even her family couldn't see her at the end. They wanted to take care of her and use the money awarded to her to do this. Her husband selfishly wanted her dead and wanted to use the money for his own wants. The politicians trying to help her were being heroic, but the courts couldn't care less what happened to her like her family did. Unfortunately, not all husbands do what is best or love their wives. He didn't. They should have just given her care over to her family. This was about money and greed! Her husband couldn't wait for her to die. How sad! And what is sadder is that people thought the decision to let her die was the right decision. Like her brother said, if they took food and water from you, you would die, too. TWO WEEKS! Dying this way is terrible suffering.
Published by: Michael
West Chester, PA 01/22/2010 11:45 PM EST
Now that we have had a few years to step back from this tragedy. Is there a place to look at the historical facts to understand what really happened?
Published by: Michael Robiolio
Darlington, WI 01/22/2010 10:29 PM EST
Truth in a brother's love!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
06:42 pm | Catholic bishop warns of more crisis in Pakistan floods’ wake 02:15 pm | New US stamp honors Mother Teresa, admirer and critic of American society 01:15 pm | Tuning into God's call: Former radio personality finds new station in life at Catholic school 12:25 pm | Vatican analyst certain of November consistory 07:52 am | Austin diocese organizes resistance to health board's abortion funding Related news :
Terry Schiavo's brother helps fight custody battle Father of Terri Schiavo remembered as ‘an inspiration’ Get CNA News on your email:
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||
