|
|
||||||||
|
Case of British girl who refused heart transplant could be used to promote euthanasia
Related articles:
.- Dr. Luis Raez, expert in bioethics and professor at the Hematology and Oncology Clinic at the University of Miami’s Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, has warned that the case of Hannah Jones, a 13 year-old British girl who decided not to undergo a heart transplant, sets a precedent that is “very dangerous and could be used legally to promote euthanasia.” The Case Hannah explained that her treatments have exhausted her and that taking medicines constantly has been very difficult. “I don’t like to be like this but I live with it,” she said. For these and other reasons she decided to refuse the transplant, without which doctors have said she has only six months to live. In response to her refusal, administrators at the Herefordshire Primary Care Trust in Hereford, England decided to seek temporary custody of the child in order to “force” her to undergo the surgery. However, after several court hearings and a report from a child protection officer, the hospital withdrew its legal action. According to the BBC, Hannah convinced the officer that her decision was the result of thoughtful and mature reflection. "I don't know exactly what Hannah said but it must have been powerful enough to convince some very high-up people that she was right. It is an incredible thing for a young person who has been through such a lot to have the bravery to stand up for her rights. We're so very proud of our little girl,” her father Andrew Jones told The Independent. Together with Hannah’s mother Kristy, Andrew supports the decision of their daughter. “Obviously we want to have Hannah with us as long as possible, but we are not going to force her to do something that she doesn’t want to do at this time,” he told The Daily Mail. Anti-life Manipulation Alicia Latorre, president of the Spanish Federation of Pro-life Associations, said the reporting on Hannah has been fraught with “deceitful language. The sensationalist media tells us that Hannah Jones, the British 13 year-old girl who does not want a heart transplant has won the battle to ‘die with dignity’.” She noted that the term “death with dignity” is one of the euphemisms used by the culture of death. “Human beings have dignity from the moment of conception and it is the obligation of everyone to facilitate that everyone can be born and enjoy conditions of life in accordance with that dignity,” she said. Dr. Raez pointed out that “the Catholic Church has always been clear that extraordinary means should not be forced upon someone in order to artificially prolong life, but these means are defined according to the person and the circumstances. For example, a heart transplant in an elderly patient (over the age of 85) is probably an extraordinary and unnecessary procedure, but in this case it is a girl who is only 13 years old. Certainly there are doubts as to whether her life expectancy would be another 70 years but only God knows how long it would be.” Raez noted that “heart surgery is a procedure performed every day in all countries of the world, and thus it is not always necessarily an extraordinary procedure.” Another aspect of the case, he said, “is the precedent, since British and European law influences greatly this kind of legislation. In English-speaking countries, this case creates a very dangerous precedent that could be used to legally promote euthanasia if children are allowed to express their opinions without having adequate knowledge of the issue, especially when they are sick.” Raez went on to state that perhaps “due to her young age and the suffering she has endured because of her long illness, she is losing the hope to live.” Therefore, he said, “the parents, who are legally responsible for making decisions for her are without hope and faith and no longer wish to keep fighting.” “The dignity of the human person is extremely valuable even when one is suffering or dying, because the love of God for us never diminishes even when we go through the worst of circumstances,” he asserted. Dr. Luis Raez is certified by the American Board in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology. He currently works on research for new cancer treatments and has published numerous articles on medical ethics and euthanasia, stem-cells and human embryos. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Sanda
USA 11/23/2008 01:23 AM EST
Hannah, only the LORD knows why we go through the things we do for sure! I Thank THE LORD for the mercy of being able to make a decision for your own body not to suffer someone elses opinion, when it's your body and you would have to endure, not the medical staff, who want to enflick their their unsure practices on your person. know this: THE LORD knows all things and through the THE LORD JESUS CHRIST you can have life more abundantly here according to GOD'S WILL. Through THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, you can one day live forever (read the Christian Bible, the book of John 3:16). JESUS does LOVE you, no matter how the enemy makes you feel!
Published by: E.A
St. Louis, MO 11/16/2008 12:16 PM EST
This is so sad. I can't believe that a thirteen-year-old is authorized to make her own descisions about serious issues like this. I'm only a few years older... I have siblings her age. I know without a doubt that this is not a descision to be left to a kid. I wouldn't want it left to me in this position.
Published by: MICHAEL
AUSTRALIA 11/14/2008 09:28 PM EST
This young girl is assessing her situation much more clearly than some of the experts! She has been told that the probability of successful transplant is remote. She has decided to let nature take its toll, as it ultimately would for all of us. This has nothing to do with euthanasia ( which I do not support )
Published by: Julie
UK 11/14/2008 11:17 AM EST
I am a Catholic and I am pro-life. I see this case as a fairly straightforward example of refusing futile treatment; even if the transplant was a success, it was not going to prolong her life by much, it would have meant taking heavy medication to prevent rejection of the new organ, and she would have been in and out of hospital. I also agree with you that pro -euthanasia campaigners may try to use this case as an argument for euthanasia. I also think the last thing you should do, is enter into an argument about this particular case, because it is a non issue, and because the media do try to provoke the church into making statments so that they have a straw man to push over in these discussions. Don't let yourself be baited - it is a trap.
Published by: Janice Vinson
Columbia/Tn/USA 11/14/2008 07:34 AM EST
As a cardiologist, I can say that a heart transplant is ALWAYS an extraordinary procedure.The issue here is whether a minor can make the decision about that extraordinary means.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
When there is no cure, relieve suffering by honoring dignity, says Holy Father New project launched to reduce abortion rate for pre-natal Down syndrome diagnoses Sexual orientation laws trump religious freedom, California Supreme Court says Bush administration to implement regulation protecting healthcare providers' consciences Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||
