Catholic adoption agency’s new policy will allow homosexuals to adopt
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- The largest Catholic adoption agency in England and Wales has decided to implement an adoption policy that does not rule out same-sex couples in the face of new laws that forbid such screening. The change in its adoption policy was made with the full support of the bishops who oversee the agency.

The decision, made by the Catholic Children’s Society of Arundel and Brighton, Portsmouth and Southwark (A&BSP) means the society will not turn away any homosexual couples who present themselves as potential adopters.

Terry Connor, chief executive of the society, explained to The Universe that any changes would not start until January and were a direct result of the recent Sexual Orientation Regulations which enforced “rights” for same sex couples who wish to adopt.

The move will undoubtedly be seen as controversial in some quarters. In January 2007, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor wrote to the-then Prime Minister Tony Blair suggesting that Catholic adoption agencies in England and Wales would be forced to close down if they were not allowed to opt out of new gay rights laws, which he said contradicted Catholic teaching.

The cardinal said forcing people to act against their consciences would mean discrimination on the grounds of belief, adding that it would be an "unnecessary tragedy" if Catholic agencies were forced to close.

In the cardinal's Westminster archdiocese, the Catholic Children's Society has opted to mount a legal challenge to the regulations by amending its constitution. But A&BSP, which prepares between 40-50 potential adoptive parents a year, has instead decided to comply with them.

In a letter sent to the society's supporters by Mr. Connor, he suggested that such a course offered the "only transparent, straightforward and guaranteed way of preserving our full range of much needed services for some of the most vulnerable children in the country."

His letter added that the bishops concerned - together with trustees, management and staff - had all agreed that, in the circumstances, it was the most reasonable and responsible course of action for the greater good.

Mr. Connor also stated clearly that that eligibility to apply to adopt a child was only the first step on the road to adoption.

"I suspect if a same-sex couple arrives at any of the agencies just to test out the system, they will not get very far," he said this week.

“We do not know whether we will actually be asked to consider same sex couples for the placing of children because, statistically, very few same sex couples go for adoption anyway.”

"We have to give an interview to same sex couples asking to be considered for adoption. But we are not anticipating we are going to get lots of same sex couples. It is much more likely that they will go to their local authority because it is the local authority which makes decisions about matching children with approved adopters, not the society.”

Mr. Connor added: "We need to make it very clear that the assessment of any adopters is very thorough. It is not about finding children for adults, but it is about finding families for very difficult children.”

"There are bishops who are taking the legal route about this, but ours are not. It remains to be seen whether that would result in more difficulties for their agencies.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Rod Sharp
United Kingdom 08/15/2009 02:49 PM EST
I cannot help but think the CAA has done this for the benefit of the majority of children it places with heterosexual couples.
I am a Christian (though not specifically Catholic), but their decision still causes me a dilemma, as some other new laws in the UK do.
I cannot see it is in the interests of a vulnerable mixed up heterosexual child to be placed in the care of a practising homosexual.
How will the CAA now handle this potential situation (how ever few times it occurs) ?
Published by: James Smith
Newport, South Wales UK 12/02/2008 10:19 AM EST
I think the catholic church is tolerated within a 'secular' UK. Like any organisation it has the ability to do good or evil. For some Catholisism means 'the truth' for others corruption and protection of child abusers. Jesus walked among sinners & gave hope for all. Many, but not all of the comments i have read appear full of hate with little or no actual consideration for children in need of a home. Using arguments of Nazi's to compare men & women who wish to adopt seem's a bit extreme. Homosexual's amongst many others were killed by the Nazi's, as well as being Nazi's. Did the Pope of the time oppose the Nazi's? & does the current Pope have any past connection with them? The laws of men (secular & catholic..) are often quoted to support our own beliefs & prejudices. The devil I'm sure has read the bible & anyone can take a quote or sentence to support their view, but this I fear misses the whole point of God's love.It is only God who can judge? Catholic's, including it's leaders like all men are imperfect and have difficult & imperfect decisions to make. Mysterious ways & the throwing of stones spring to my mind & soul.
Published by: Layla
New York, NY 08/06/2008 04:30 PM EST
Just say no, England!

As a Catholic Organization, you cannot allow children to be adopted by homosexuals or you are no longer recognized as such.
Published by: Nicolas Bellord
UK 08/05/2008 04:37 AM EST
As a retired lawyer who spent his career acting for Catholic charities I find this story very curious. The Catholic Children's Society is presumably a Catholic charity. It seems to me that for it suddenly pretend it is not catholic and to act in contravention of Church teaching is unlawful and a breach of trust which exposes the trustees to legal action. I wonder what the Charity Commission, who regulate all Charities in the UK, have to say.
Published by: Paula Hagan
UK 08/05/2008 02:20 AM EST
It beggars belief that our Catholic Hierachy do not have the moral and spiritual 'backbone' to stand up for Church Teaching and should not go down this slippery slope. As Catholics how can we have faith in our Hierachy when they make decisions that are completely against Church teaching. What is the real reason for this decision-where has the pressure come from. This is a complete turn around!
Published by: Lann
Saratoga 08/04/2008 07:52 PM EST
None of you seriously think that the decision was "made with the full support of the bishops who oversee the agency," convinces anyone that the enterprise is any less immoral, do you?
Published by: bj
dover,NJ,USA 08/03/2008 08:33 AM EST
re: the comments criticizing the Cardinal - if I read the article correctly, the Cardinal, in fact, has mounted a legal challenge to the laws. It is other bishops, not him, who have caved in. If under a Nazi government the law said you had to hand over babies for adoption to Nazis who believed in teaching their children to hate others, should a Catholic adoption agency do it? If not, why do it in this case - is not the harm as bad or worse?
Published by: Peter Devine
England 08/02/2008 01:40 AM EST
There were more than one Bishop to suffer for the faith in England during the reformation. Twelve Bishops died of torture and starvation in prisons across the land.Their blood will be our salvation and England will once again be the Dowry of Mary despite the weekness and capitulation of the present Hierarchy.
Published by: Daniel Guenzel
Milwaukee, Wiscosnin, USA 07/30/2008 11:50 AM EST
What do you mean a Catholic adoption agency will place children with homosexuals?

The Cardinal had better shut them down forthwith if they decide to do such an unspeakable thing, and if the Cardinal will not act then the Pope had better shut down the Cardinal. This is monstrous and cannot be allowed to stand. We'd better get off our comfortable chairs and start ringing the Cardinal right now. Not tomorrow. Right now.
Published by: Esther
Florida 07/29/2008 01:29 PM EST
That adoption agency in particular must be taken away the name "Catholic", and be disconneceted from the Archdiocese.

Catholics, we, do not support homosexual lifestyle!

Praised be Jesus Christ, praised be His Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church!
Published by: Jack Pinknell
Burnaby BC Canada 07/29/2008 11:19 AM EST
I cannot fathom any Catholic organization thinking that "much needed services for some of the most vulnerable children in the country" is served by doing violence to them?
Published by: Lynn
USA 07/29/2008 07:06 AM EST
The "smoke of Satan" will not clear the sanctuary, I fear, until Jesus comes again. "For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world."
Published by: Jack
Connecticut, USA 07/29/2008 05:02 AM EST
This organization should not be affiliated with the Catholic Church anymore. The word Catholic should be stricken from all of it's dealings. People today have began to think that they are more "compassionate" than God himself.
Published by: Kevin
Kuwait 07/29/2008 03:31 AM EST
England Once again persecuting Catholics!!
Published by: G.Matten (Mrs)
Lincs, England 07/29/2008 02:59 AM EST
I am astounded and sickened that a Catholic agency should throw aside the clear teaching of God and the Church, to come in line with corrupt secular values. The Catholic Church has always been the one church that stands firm on the truth - what on earth can our bishops be thinking of!
Published by: sinewave
Rochester MI USA 07/28/2008 09:56 PM EST
it's time for heterosexual couples to step up, and give of themselves by adopting all the orphans before others have the chance. for evil to win, it only takes good people who do nothing.
Published by: maria
providence, ri, usa 07/28/2008 09:33 PM EST
The Catholic Church should not compromise with the world.
Published by: thomas warner
madison, wi 07/28/2008 09:07 PM EST
Take the case to Rome and get the correct answer.
Published by: eleanor
new york new york 07/28/2008 05:09 PM EST
Does Pope know about this corruption and why then are they not shut down. These agencies are not representative of Catholicism. No real Christian, Catholic or otherwise can go along with this. As an RC, I always felt that the Catholic Church was the one Church that would not be swayed by the world. We are fast losing what made us pleasing to God.
Published by: Jeremy Cox
Wareham Dorset England 07/28/2008 04:22 PM EST
I feel that it is a tragedy that the dubious social experiment of handing children to homosexual couples to bring up is being endorsed by the Catholic Church. If she approves it who will hold back?
Published by: iryshqueen
Ave Maria, FL. USA 07/28/2008 03:58 PM EST
Mr. Connor, he suggested that such a course offered the "only transparent, straightforward and guaranteed way of preserving our full range of much needed services for some of the most vulnerable children in the country." Aren't these children the most vulnerable? To put them in disordered homes (see the Catechism of the Catholic Churches definition of homosexualty) is wrong. It would be better to not even operate such a business than to possibly be responsible for the exposure and possible violation of little children by adopting to homosexual couples. They will come and you bishops have much to answer for. Would our first apostles consider such a thing...no they would be hanged or fed to the lions first and die with a smile on their face.
Published by: Tom Canning
B.C. Canada 07/28/2008 03:08 PM EST
It should not be forgotten that only one Bishop and one lawyer stood up to Henry V111 when he declared that he was head of the church
Published by: Dewey F. Totty
Southfield, MI 48075 07/28/2008 02:01 PM EST
So, a few years down this road and the Pope will be obligated to offer more apologies?? One should learn from their mistakes and not go that way again.
Published by: Stuart
UK 07/28/2008 12:55 PM EST
I don't believe a word of it. A year from today someone should look to see if the CAA has allowed a Gay couple to adopt.

If I was a betting person I would put my life savings on NONE.
Published by: Karen Kriske
Sacramento, CA USA 07/28/2008 12:06 PM EST
Rate: Excellent
It would be nice if people would STOP using the Catholic banner when they make decisions and actions that are contrary to what the Roman Catholic Church Catechism teaches under the wisdom of Holy Father, the Pope.
Published by: Patrick
MN 07/28/2008 11:24 AM EST
Rate: Excellent
Concessions like this don't seem right. How can the Church make a strong stand against Homosexuality if we start to give in here and there?
Published by: Barbara O'Brien Arato
Huntington, N.Y. USA 07/28/2008 11:20 AM EST
Are institutions obliged to honor request of biological parents when they give up children for adoption? Such as, only a particular religion? Would they be able to request only heterosexual persons or person?
Is one acknowledging homosexuality as normal by allowing them to adopt or is it an acknowledging that they are humanbeings with faults also?
Published by: DK
PA 07/28/2008 11:16 AM EST
I can't believe that the Church gave in to secular society. Very chilling! When the Church becomes one with the world, look out!
Published by: Aaron
Riverside/California/USA 07/28/2008 10:34 AM EST
Passing law that potentially forces good agencies to close their doors is a demonstration of a short-sighted and intolerant legislature. It is tragic that the entity most capable of fighting values legislation has backed down. Their battle has only been postponed until the day a same-sex couple shows up demanding to adopt. Conscience will mean little in the eyes of the law.
Published by: James
Tampa/FL 07/28/2008 10:32 AM EST
And lo the great apostasy digs deep into our heart. May Jesus come soon and save us for our leaders, our Fathers, our Bishops in England have failed us. Please Lord, come soon. have Mercy on us!!!!!
Published by: P Brown
Franklin/TN/USA 07/28/2008 10:06 AM EST
So, when push comes to shove, the Church caves in on the Truth, and now we hand over a little more of our freedom to practice our religion as it is meant to be practiced. Jesus once drew a line in the sand; oh that our Church leaders would follow his lead.
Published by: Steven Moore
Newtwon, CT USA 07/28/2008 09:37 AM EST
It is sad how many lead their flock to perdition. Are there no longer Thomas More's in England who can say "no", irrespective of the consequences?
Published by: Dan in Calgary
Calgary Alberta Canada 07/28/2008 03:27 AM EST
Rate: Regular
It's the least of two evils in this case and I agree with the decision - Catholics must not abandon the cause of adopted children altogether even if it means that some adoptees will have to make do in a less-than-ideal situation that is better than homelessness. By being involved in the adoption, the Church can still keep a string of connectivity with each such child and make repairs later.

Dan in Calgary
Published by: Elizabeth
Canada 07/27/2008 11:59 PM EST
What an absolute tragedy for children! What is it that has caused these Bishops to not protect the children. May God have mercy on us all for this abomination!
Published by: Louis
Singapore 07/27/2008 06:30 PM EST
Rate: Excellent
The Catholic Children's Society can make as many excuses as they would like about the issue, but end never justifies the means. Catholic Moral Ethics teaches us that we cannot commit evil to achieve good. Hence, we should not be sacrificing a few lambs to people who we know to be immoral and opposed the values which the Catholic Church teaches and believes. If they want to start doing what ever they please, then they should not be called a Catholic Children's Society.
"But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea." Matthew 18:6
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
Latest news:
Related news :
Get CNA News on your email:
Your E-mail:
Subscribe HTML
Unsubscribe Text only
Headlines
Resources
read this
First Reading:
rss
read this
podcast
audio
Gospel:
rss
read this
podcast
audio
Saint of the Day
podcast
audio
Homily of the day
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa