Catholic leaders react to Obama victory, offer advice
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

John Allen, Fr. Frank Pavone and George Weigel (L to R)

.- Prominent Catholics’ reactions to the election of Illinois Sen. Barack Obama as president have been cautionary, advising increased catechesis and cultural engagement while for Catholics warning that Obama’s use of the presidency to advance abortion rights must be opposed.

Austin Ruse, President of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, told CNA Catholics should support Obama where they can and oppose him “with all of our being” on issues like abortion. He also emphasized a focus on catechesis.

“If Catholics were really acting on a proper understanding of their faith, Barack Obama would never have been elected,” he claimed.

Voicing his suspicion that regular Mass-goers favored McCain but “generic Catholics” favored Obama, Ruse said he thought the organized Catholic effort in the McCain campaign was “very weak.”

“It never really got off the ground and was hamstrung by bad planning and bad execution. I was fairly close to it and I know it was sadly gummed up with personal agendas that had little to do with electing John McCain and mostly with protecting turf. The Catholic outreach for the McCain campaign was extremely unedifying.”

However, Ruse said, the bishops were “stars.”

“We have never seen anything like it. More than 100 came out publically against the Culture of Death. I suspect that many of them will be hassled by the IRS. I hope they remain strong. I suspect they will and that they will be even stronger as the months progress.”

Ruse cautioned that Obama and his allies will be “the most pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage of any administration in history. The Church will be in semi-permanent opposition to the adminstration on these most important public policy issues in the church. I expect that the bishops will be very active as will faithful Catholic laity,” he told CNA, saying the Church will have to fight more vigorously for “life and family.”

Father Frank Pavone, President of Priests for Life, said Catholics should focus on challenging Obama “every day of his Presidency to stop the ongoing killing of children in America, and to work for ‘change’ in the Democratic Party so that it no longer is a herald of death for the unborn.”

Father Pavone noted that Catholics always play a “key role” in deciding who will be president and said bishops have made “many excellent statements” on the primacy of the right to life as an election issue. He claimed that the bishops’ teaching in “Forming Consciences For Faithful Citizenship” was “abused and distorted both within and outside the Church,” calling for those distortions to be corrected by the same mechanisms that created the document.

He added that the Catholic Church’s effort to register voters could have been “much stronger,” urging that registration drives for the 2010 election cycle begin now.

Turning his attention to voter education material, Father Pavone criticized many dioceses’ policies against allowing material from “outside groups.”

“It fosters a view of the Church which is bureaucratic and institutional rather than one of the Spirit-filled Body of Christ with many different parts, gifts, and ministries all encouraging one another,” he told CNA.

“I find it particularly unhelpful to be referred to as an ‘outside group’ and to have our vigorous efforts to educate our fellow Catholics in the teachings of the bishops be greeted with ‘we can only use our own materials,’ as if the teaching ministry of priests or the unity of the Church gets shut down at election time.”

When CNA asked about the role of the Church in the public square under an Obama administration, Father Pavone replied:

“The Church will face increasing pressure to not interfere with the positions of public officials on issues like abortion and marriage; yet the actions of a pro-abortion administration and a pro-abortion Vice-president will necessarily prompt a response from the Church. In other words, we have to be ready to fight.”

Vatican journalist John L. Allen Jr. told CNA that the Catholic Church “isn’t a political party, and its primary concerns aren’t about policy or legislation.”

The Church’s focus should be “where it’s always been – spiritual life, the sacraments, fostering a relationship with God through Christ.”

“That said, the Church is obviously interested in public affairs from the perspective of justice, and as it does with every government, it will want to try to work with the Obama administration to promote human dignity. In practice, that will mean continuing to make moral arguments on behalf of unborn life, while also pursuing natural areas of agreement with the new administration such as immigration reform, economic justice, peace, and environmental protection.”

Allen suggested the Church and the Obama White House could work together to promote development in Africa, saying 2009 is shaping up to be a “Year of Africa” for global Catholicism. Pope Benedict XVI plans to visit Cameroon and Angola in March and the Synod for Africa will be held in October.

Citing exit polls, Allen said Obama captured a majority of overall Catholics while narrowly losing among white Catholics. Noting that many of those white Catholics were “undoubtedly” motivated by life issues such as abortion, he said that if Obama truly wishes to be a unifier, “he needs to reach out and find common ground on the life issues, especially abortion.”

In Allen’s view, most of the bishops adhered to the position of their “Faithful Citizenship” document, with only a “small minority” making statements with “a clear partisan edge.”

“I think it would be a mistake to treat the result as a ‘defeat’ for the bishops; for the vast majority of bishops who taught that making specific political choices is the task of a well-formed laity, the election of Obama (or McCain, had it turned out that way) could not be a victory or a defeat.”

He explained that the Church now faces the challenge of establishing a relationship with the Obama administration that isn’t “exclusively one of chronic opposition.” Allen suggested the bishops study the work of Vatican diplomacy, which has “centuries of experience” in dealing with regimes that are “in one way or another are hostile to some aspect of Church teaching.”

Allen stated that the prospects for an outright reversal of Roe v. Wade are “extremely limited” under an Obama administration.

“Perhaps the challenge is therefore to shift gears a bit, investing greater resources in winning the argument for life at the cultural level. In other words, perhaps we should rely less on the coercive power of the state, and more on the disposition of the human heart to respond to the truth,” Allen wrote.

George Weigel, political commentator and biographer of Pope John Paul II, said serious Catholics should focus on trying to protect pro-life legal gains over the past thirty years from “President Obama and a radically pro-abortion Congress led by a self-described ‘ardent Catholic’.”

Weigel reiterated the necessity of defeating the federal Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would eliminate abortion restrictions and could remove protections for pro-life conscientious objection.

The Catholic vote also needed to be studied, he told CNA:

“It will be interesting to see how the ‘Catholic vote’ finally broke, but it will be essential to pick that vote apart and look at how regular-Mass-going Catholics voted as distinguished from occasional church-goers and other ‘tribal’ Catholics.”

Weigel argued that the bishops can “no longer ignore” the question of the reception of Holy Communion by national leaders “who persistently and willfully advance the culture of death.”

He added that if Congress repeals the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited federal funding for abortions, bishops and theologians will have to consider the ethical consequences.

“The Washington State euthanasia victory was a large blow to the cause of the Culture of Life, and we clearly need to revisit the question of how we argue that issue,” he closed.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Sam
Albertson NY 03/30/2009 04:55 PM EST
Some interesting comments. Always fascinating to hear from the "one issue" voters, those who think voting against abortion is the only decision, oblivious to the disaster eight years of right-wing evangelical government have caused.

There are many active catholics who voted for President Obama in spite of the rhetoric of Bishops who insist on one-issue voting.

Here's an excellent analysis of the election and the meaning for future elections.

"Youth vote for Obama bodes ill for future of GOP" People under 30 voted 2-1 FOR President Obama.

But the deeper problem, for Republicans, is that the party has wrecked its brand with the more diverse and more tolerant voters now entering the electorate. Much has been written about the Palinization of the Republican Party in this election and the McCain campaign's clumsy embrace of the "real" and "pro-American" parts of American society. Young voters are less rural, less White, less racially resentful, more educated and more media savvy than older cohorts. A campaign that trumpeted "Joe the Plumber" was certain to lose younger voters in droves.
Published by: Tim
Pittsburgh, PA 11/15/2008 12:37 AM EST
If McCain had clearly and forcefully laid out an effective plan to overturn Roe v Wade or otherwise end abortion, he would have had my vote. He did not.

Most of the posters here need to realize that we have two parties (yes, Mariana, the party matters) that favor legalized abortion. One of these parties makes a pretense of opposing it to reel in the pro-life vote around election time, and the pro-life message will rarely be heard until it's needed at the next election, regardless of what their party platform says. In the meantime, they'll go about their main efforts (enriching the already rich and imperialist wars).

Maybe Catholic voters who vote Republican can have T-shirts made up that say "My candidate said he was pro-life and all I got was this lousy war".
Published by: Lynn
Washington 11/11/2008 09:33 PM EST
What really shocked me about the election results was what they were saying about the Catholic vote split. It was 45% Obama 55% McCain. The 45% is a true reading of how Christians are failing. I think that when Austin Ruse, President of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, said, “If Catholics were really acting on a proper understanding of their faith, Barack Obama would never have been elected.” He could have easily replaced the word “Catholics” with the word “Christians”. It shows that we are NOT upholding the faith and the word of God as we should and maybe all pastors, priests, church leaders should re-examine how forcefully they are stating Biblical principals and how God views the sin of homosexuality, abortion, gay marriage, etc and more aggressively speak out.I encourage all pastors, priests, church leaders to listen to the voice of God and be unwavering in the message of faith they deliver to all who listen to their voice. The voice of pastors, priests, and church leaders are listened to by people from all walks of life….their voice, their Godly examples, their moral standard, and the messages they relate to the world are vitally important. They are the focal light of the world we listen to and through their messages the Holy Spirit moves to convict the hearts of men with the seeds they plant in our ears.
Well done! Please continue to fight the good fight of faith. Continue to be a strong example them that hear your voice.
Published by: Nancy
Valley Stream 11/10/2008 04:42 PM EST
I know many Demnocrats who are opposed to aboirionand there is an organization for pro-life Democrats. What I HAVE found though is that many of my pro life Democrat friends refused to acknowledge that Obama is very , very pro-choice. Secondly , I disagree that the Republican Party "gives" us poverty (or war. History tells us otherwise) I was a college student during the 70's and remember the Great Society , the War on Poverty, Johnson, Carter and all the rest. And I have become far more conservative for amny reasons, but I don't accept that heartlessness is one of them.
Published by: Jose G.
Dallas, Texas 11/08/2008 06:18 PM EST
Lets be honest here. There are many Republican leaning priests, bishops, organizations, and cardinals putting their party over what is best for the nation. The American Cathoics voting for McCain are ignoring the majority of evils that Republican's turn a blind eye. Obama was clearly the only presidential candidate acting with a mannor consistent of Jesus Christ's minstry.

McCain and his supporters acted more like Roman torturers and the angry mob. There was nothing christian in the slander calls of terrorist, muslim, traitor or kill him. How can any catholic support that unchristian like treatment of Obama? Didn't Jesus himself say to "Love one another as I have love you?"

Americans voters and politicans do not interfere in the election of the Pope. I find it inappropriate for the church to create talking points that interfere with the U.S secular election of its leaders. Except for encouraging the vote and taking up issues after the election, I believe as a cathoic that the church has no business interfering in the elections process. The church should take an official no comment line. Let the nation make its decisions unbiasedly. Or else you invite American voters and political leaders interfering in church business.
Published by: Mariana
Newton MA USA 11/08/2008 12:26 AM EST
Francis
"Judge lest you be judged." Matthew 7:1-3
I am a catholic teen Who feels that Life begins at conception. McCain is pro life. He stated that and he has shown it in his legislation. It is not the party that has to be pro life. We need to make that distinction. In regards to Tim post I fear he voted for his pocket, and war over the lives of the unborn. A catholic can't belong to one party. They may side with one party on certain Issues instead of another. Catholics need to be educated on the Stances of the church in an easy document understandable by all Catholics. The church has been around 2000 years, and hasn't changed it stance on the issues of Abortion Gay marriage, cloning embryo researched: At The start of the church Pagan woman were often forced to have abortions, and husbands abused, and had affairs. The Catholic Church in its beginnings clearly stated life begins at conception, and Adultery. Many were drawn to Catholicism, because of that. The fact is the church doesn't support one party but rather as I said before, votes on moral issues. Not voting on the moral issues is considered a Mortal sin in The Church. Typically most conservatives are pro lifewhile democrats are pro choice that is just the demographic. I Don't vote for a party I vote on the Social issues Abortion, Gay marriage, Eugenics cloning, Embryonic stem cell research. I know that McCain was 4 embryonic research, but he opposed the rest. Obama was for all except gay marriage, and E
Published by: Tim
Pittsburgh, PA 11/06/2008 09:45 PM EST
I am a regular attendee at Sunday Mass and all holy days. I am strongly opposed to abortion...and I voted for Obama. My faith does not require me to vote for a Republican Party that makes a pretense of opposing abortion. Republicans have had numerous opportunities to do much more to end abortion, but instead give us war and poverty, and trot out the anti-abortion line every four years to get the votes of the faithful. If both parties are pro-abortion, I will choose to oppose war, poverty and social injustice. The slim odds of having a Republican president appoint a Supreme Court justice that will overturn Roe v Wade just not justify ignoring all other issues in which we should be interested.
Published by: George T
Seattle 11/06/2008 03:08 PM EST
I'm a lapsed Catholic. The reality is that the RC Church has become an irrelevant dinosaur for most of us. The majority of the minority who still attend mass only pay lip service to it.

The new pope has been a disaster. While I disagreed with Pope John Paul on most things I give him credit for being a charismatic leader during his earlier years. The new pope is a bland reactionary who is helping the drift away from the church.

Obama was clearly the true Christian candidate in this election. Jesus represented the poor not big business.

Yes, I expect to see my post censored.
Published by: Anonymous
Mesa, AZ USA 11/06/2008 02:37 PM EST
Not all Democratic President's, Dem. Party, and candidates believe in abortion; so get your facts right! Also, I believe that the reason Obama won the election is because today's youth don't want to see the United States fall into a deeper ****hole like it has under the "Republican" Bush Administration!
Published by: tyndlfeine
Eugene OR USA 11/06/2008 01:53 PM EST
Allen wrote, ”In other words, perhaps we should rely less on the coercive power of the state, and more on the disposition of the human heart to respond to the truth."

Best statement I have heard in all the Church's rhetoric to date. It is about time you realised this is where our focus should be, should have been all along, and, historically, used to be. The Church has allowed the extremism of the ecclesial community (as other extreme radical groups in the name of God) to undermine the efforts of the faithful at the spiritual, social and cultural level. An extremism that has fostered hate, fear, determimation and rejection.

In all my service to the community (in pro-life organisations), I have never come across one person who said, "I love abortion". Not one! It has always been about and the question of choice. Our struggle has always been and shall always remain with the heart of that choice, not the manner in which it is carried out.

In this context the Holy Father said, "The Catholic Church is eager to share the richness of the Gospel’s social message, for it enlivens hearts with a hope for the fulfillment of justice and a love that makes all men and women truly brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus," 2008-10-27, Pope Benedict XVI
Published by: Anna Marie Schwager
Ocala, FL USA 11/06/2008 01:26 PM EST
In my opinion, Obama won because of the Black & Hispanic vote. And also his win was motivated by our economy. If our economy was not in dire straights, people would have voted otherwise. But, we need to pray harder to open people's hearts & see the wrong that is being done in letting the innocent die & condoning abortion. Our strong faith in doing right will prevail in the end.
God Bless America...
Published by: Francis
Topeka KS 11/06/2008 12:39 PM EST
Sadly, while I agree many regular Mass attendees voted for life candidates. I was shocked to see over the campaign season bumber stickers supporting pro-abortion candidates on th cars of daily communicants. I am glad that some of the Bishops spoke out courageously, but many more need to do so as well as the pastors of parishes.
Published by: Dennis Longwell
Florence, KY USA 11/06/2008 11:14 AM EST
The bishops came out in regard to abortion but should have been doing so for several years... Too little to late. People should have been told that to vote for abortion is not consistent with membership is Catholocism.
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe/NM/US 11/06/2008 08:42 AM EST
The Church may now need to increase positive focus and energy on the sacremental life of it's core and unfortunately leave US society to fend for itself given the Pro-Life setbacks.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa