Catholic medical experts back new ethical embryonic stem-cell research
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Washington D.C., Jun 28, 2005 / 12:00 am (CNA).- A new experimental technique that could produce embryo-like stem cells — without killing human embryos in the process — has the support of 35 medical experts and ethicists, about half of them Catholic or related to Catholic organizations. The experts issued a statement recently, explaining that the technique would not conflict with the moral teachings of the Catholic Church on embyronic stem-cell research. That’s because, according to this technique, the genetic material injected into an egg would be modified to produce a pluripotent stem cell instead of an embryo.

According to the experts, the cell would be “incapable of being or becoming an embryo.”

"This new proposal addresses the Catholic Church's fundamental moral objection to embryonic stem-cell research as now practiced, by offering to create cells with the properties of embryonic stem cells without ever producing or harming a human embryo," Richard Doerflinger, deputy director of theUSCCB Secretariat for Pro-life Secretariat, told Catholic News Service.

The experts called for the initial research to use only “nonhuman animal cells.”

If the experiments demonstrate “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the technique “can reliably be used to produce pluripotent stem cells without creating embryos, we would support research on human cells,” the experts stated.

Among the signatories to the statement are: Archbishop John Myers of Newark, N.J, Fr. Kevin FitzGerald, SJ, professor of Catholic health care ethics at Georgetown University; Fr. Kevin Flannery, SJ, dean of philosophy at the Gregorian University in Rome, and John Haas, president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center, Fr. Thomas Berg, executive director of the Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Katherine Clyde
Bronx, NY USA 06/28/2005 02:38 PM EST
From an article at Communio I heard about this before it hit the press. They opposed it; reasons were that the "embryo-like" stem pluripotents were still considered human; and, the process of intervening abruptly in the normal development of the original cell mutated, rather than rendered neutral the subsequent result of the conception. It doesn't seem to me that what you are trying to determine is whether or not an embryo is actually developed, but what KIND of embryo and that this is reasonably obvious to begin with. Maybe that sounds like I'm nitpicking, after all, some people change the color of their hair and give blood samples. It does, however look horrifyingly suspiciously like a profound solution to an impossible situation. Aren't the "experts" just a little nervous about the eventual development of a slave race for instance, something like Galileo?
Rate this comment:
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa