City funding for Mark Twain church prompts lawsuit threat
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Reno, Nev., Mar 3, 2009 / 03:57 am (CNA).- Carson City, Nevada’s decision to fund sidewalks, landscaping and roof repairs for a church that Mark Twain helped build has prompted protests and the threat of a lawsuit from a group that advocates strict separation of church and state.

Last month, Carson City supervisors voted to give the city’s First Presbyterian Church $78,800 for the sidewalks, landscaping and roof repairs, the Associated Press reports. In 2006, the city gave the church $67,700 to help with design costs for a new church building adjacent to the old one.

City and church officials say the money addresses additional costs resulting from an agreement that the congregation would not raze the original church but instead build a new one.

The Washington, D.C.-based group Americans United for Separation of Church and State protested the decision. If the supervisors do not rescind their votes, the group will consider a lawsuit, Americans United attorney Alex Luchenitser said.

"It seems to be a very clear constitutional violation," he told the Associated Press. "The First Amendment mandates separation of church and state. Public funds can't be used to support religious activity directly or indirectly."

City officials said the money is designed to save the historic brick church, not support religious activity.

Luchenitser said Americans United was “quite confident” it would prevail, based on other legal precedents.

The group will reportedly give the city a chance to respond to its Thursday letter and then consider its options if the city does not change its decision.

The church’s pastor, Bruce Kochsmeier, said that the city’s money is “minimal compensation” for the church having to revise its plans. He argued the money benefits all residents.

"Doesn't the door swing both ways? Wasn't it a violation when we weren't allowed to tear down our building?" Kochsmeier asked. "Wasn't that right of religious expression being squelched?"

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: History Matters
Minneapolis, MN USA 03/16/2009 12:08 PM EST
I agree with Mr. Peringer. We have the First Amendment's religion clauses turned on their head. This is probably because we don't know much about history just after the First Amendment was ratified, which we assume people had a clearer memory of the debates than they do today.

AFTER the First Amendment was ratified...
>>Congress authorized and paid for a printing of the Holy Bible (20,000 copies)
>> Christian worship services were held regularly in the U.S. Capitol building
>> Thomas Jefferson authorized a priest and building a church for the Kaskaskia Indians
Rate this comment:
Published by: Raymond Peringer
Toronto, Canada 03/03/2009 01:11 PM EST
The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

On the face of it, this law was designed to protect churches from government interference.

As a resident of Canada, where no such law exists, I have difficulty understanding how this straight forward language got contorted into prohibiting a municipal council (not Congress)from assisting a church (not establishing it).
Rate this comment:
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa