The lawsuit was filed in 2004 after eight same-sex couples were denied marriage licenses. The couples then sued the state alleging the violation of their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process.
The state’s marriage law, they claimed, denied them the financial, social and emotional benefits of marriage.
Courts in Massachusetts and California have also instituted same-sex marriage, though California voters could repeal it through an initiative in the November election. Both courts claimed that domestic partnerships were unequal to the rights given to heterosexual marriage.
Michael Culhane, Executive Director of the Connecticut Catholic Conference (CCC), told CNA in a Friday phone interview that the decision “essentially mandates same-sex marriage.”
He explained the decision had been argued on May 14, 2007.
“Here we are a year and a half later and decision just came down,” he added.
Culhane said that, in his tentative opinion, the decision is based on the Connecticut constitution and therefore the decision as written is “final.”
However, he added that the CCC is still analyzing the decision.
A Friday statement from the CCC said both the CCC and the Catholic Bishops of Connecticut are “extremely disappointed” in the decision, charging that it “imposes” the recognition of same-sex marriage upon the people of Connecticut.
“This decision is in direct conflict with the position of our state legislature and courts of other states and is a terribly regrettable exercise in judicial activism,” they stated.
Furthermore, the bishops and the Catholic Conference argued that “Four people have not just extended a supposed civil right to a particular class of individuals, but have chosen to redefine the institution of marriage.”
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
The CCC said that, excepting Massachusetts and California, other states have ruled that marriage is a “special institution” and did not choose to redefine it.
“It appears our State Supreme Court has forgotten that courts should interpret laws and legislatures should make laws,” the CCC statement alleged.
The CCC favorably cited Justice Zarella’s dissenting opinion, adding, “The majority utterly failed to consider the relationship between the laws of marriage and family.”
“The Supreme Court of Connecticut has chosen to ignore the wisdom of our elected officials, the will of the people, and historical social and religious traditions spanning thousands of years by imposing a social experiment upon the people of our state,” the CCC remarked.
The decision by the Supreme Court also raises a “very real concern” about the infringement on religious liberty and freedom of speech, the conference asserted.
The real battle in the court case was not about rights being denied but about “conferring and enforcing social acceptance of a particular lifestyle; a lifestyle many people of faith and advocates of the natural law refuse to accept.”