Connecticut considers bill that sidelines bishops, dictates Church financial oversight
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport

.- Two Connecticut legislators introduced a bill this past Thursday that has Catholics up-in-arms about the state’s apparent attempt to meddle in Church governance. Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport called an emergency meeting on Friday, where he said the bill "directly attacks the structure of the Roman Catholic Church."

"If this bill were to be enacted, your bishop, would have virtually, virtually no real relationship with the 87 parishes…they could go off independently, some of them could break off from the Church if they wished, and go their own way as has happened, for example, with the Episcopal Church. And the pastors would be figureheads, simply working for a board of trustees," Bishop Lori explained at a meeting of Catholic school principals.

The bill, which was introduced last Thursday by the chairs of the Judiciary Committee of the Connecticut State Legislature, Senator Andrew McDonald of Stamford and Representative Michael Lawlor of East Haven, attempts to radically restructure the way that the state allows the Catholic Church to incorporate.

Both lawmakers, who are prominent homosexuals, have been vociferous advocates of same-sex marriage in Connecticut and have spoken out against the Catholic Church’s opposition to both civil unions and same-sex marriage.

According to the bill, the pastor of the congregation would report to the board of directors on all "administrative and financial matters." In addition, the archbishop or bishop would serve as an "ex-officio" member and would lose his voting rights.

Under current law, the archbishop or bishop serves as the head of the board of each individual parish, requires the pastor to answer to him and has voting rights as a board member.

The bill states that its purpose is to "provide for the investigation of the misappropriation of funds by religious corporations," but it only targets the Catholic Church. Sen. McDonald told the Connecticut Post that the bill still allows the Church to deal with "matters pertaining exclusively to religious tenets and practices."

McDonald said that the bill was spurred by a recent crime in which a Darien, Connecticut priest was convicted of stealing up to $1.4 million in donations from his parish. The senator claimed that his constituents asked him to do something to create greater transparency, and so he introduced the bill.

And yet, the bill is strikingly similar to the dissident group Voice of the Faithful’s guidelines for working to change the structure of the Church.

Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport reacted to the legislation, calling it "a thinly-veiled attempt to silence the Catholic Church on the important issues of the day, such as same-sex marriage.

"The State has no right to interfere in the internal affairs and structure of the Catholic Church," Bishop Lori stated.

The head of the Church in Bridgeport pointed out that the bill "is directed only at the Catholic Church but could someday be forced on other denominations. The State has no business controlling religion."

Bishop Lori also defended his pastors’ "exemplary job of sound stewardship and financial accountability, in full cooperation with their parishioners."

The State Legislature is another matter, he said, mentioning that it "has not reversed a $1 billion deficit in this fiscal year" and that its efforts "to try to manage the Catholic Church makes no sense."

"The Catholic Church not only lives within her means but stretches her resources to provide more social, charitable, and educational services than any other private institution in the State. This bill threatens those services at a time when the State is cutting services. The Catholic Church is needed now more than ever."

Lori rejected the bill as "irrational, unlawful, and bigoted" and said that it "jeopardizes the religious liberty of our Church."

Archbishop Henry Mansell of Hartford also spoke out against the bill. "This bill violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution," he wrote. "It forces a radical reorganization of the legal, financial, and administrative structure of our parishes."

He continued by explaining that the proposed structure "is contrary to the Apostolic nature of the Catholic Church because it disconnects parishes from their Pastors and their Bishop."

Local Catholics told the Connecticut Post that they heard about the bill from announcements at weekend Masses.

"I'm upset by it," Bridgeport resident William Mortimer said. "I'm amazed that this bill is being considered by these two legislators."

Mary Sholomicky, 49, heard about the bill at a noon Mass she attended. "It was quite a shock because of the First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right to practice religion. If I didn't want to do that, I'd live in China. Any person of any religious denomination should really be nervous. They are targeting Catholics now; who knows who's next down the road six months, six years," she told the Connecticut Post.

Sholomicky said the law "would take away the authority of the bishop, the priests and the Pope."

Philip Lacovara, a constitutional lawyer and a Catholic, wrote a letter to the Judicial Committee saying, "You now have before your Committee a bill that tests your fidelity to your constitutional duty. The bill is No. 1098, which candidly announces that its purpose is to ‘revise the corporate governance provisions [of the Connecticut Statutes] applicable to the Roman Catholic Church.’" 

"In more than forty years as a constitutional law teacher and practitioner," writes Lacovara, "I cannot recall a single piece of proposed legislation at any level of government that more patently runs afoul of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment that does this bill."

A public hearing on the bill is set for Wednesday, March 11 at 12:00 noon in Room 2C of the Legislative Office Building of the State Capitol in Hartford.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Bob Phelan
Belmar/New Jersey?USA 03/13/2009 02:41 PM EST
Let's roll!

The Catholic Church won the Kulturkampf against the Prussian government in the Nineteenth Century; we can certainly win this culture war today!
Published by: Mary Pat MacKenzie
Glen Gardner, NJ, USA 03/12/2009 08:56 AM EST
St. Joseph's Church in Woods Hole Mass. (Diocese of Fall River) was also the victim of an embezzling pastor. When a local murder investigation brought out the connection between a murderer and the finances of Rev. Bernard Kelley, the pastor at St. Joseph's, Bishop George Coleman, was finally forced to deal with a situation that he had been warned about. Both George Coleman and the previous Bishop of Fall River, Sean O'Malley, had been notified in writing that Father Kelley was probably misusing funds at St. Joseph's but they chose to ignore the concerns of the Parishioners. Laws may very well need to be enacted to protect Catholic laity from the absurd secrecy that surrounds the Catholic clerical hierarchy. Most pastors are totally honest and operate their parishes with full financial transparency and total cooperation with a lay finance committee - but there are also many crooked priests who misuse Parish funds and who are protected by their Bishops. Until the Church hierarchy decides that it really is their job to protect the people in the pews, Catholics (and other believers)
need the portection of their state legislators. Financial oversight does not impinge on religious belief!
Published by: djon
phoenix 03/10/2009 05:50 PM EST
It should come as no surprise that a state which took away a family's property under eminent domain, would try to further trample individual rights by now attacking a religion. The fact that its such an obvious retaliation to the church's views on same sex marriage is a bit shocking. Who do these politicians think they are? Does this Lawlor even realize that more than 1/2 his town is of Italian ancestry? I'm willing to bet Catholicism is the dominant religion in his area. This has nothing to do with how the church handles it's finances as Amos says...it's personal.
Published by: Mike
Kearns, UT 03/10/2009 03:26 PM EST
If this proposed law doesn't bust the "stablishment clause" of the First Amendment, then nothing does. Blatantly Unconstitutional.
Published by: coltakashi
Richland, WA, USA 03/10/2009 02:37 PM EST
It is clear that the LGBT agenda is to place sexual rights above religious rights. The goal of establishing same sex marriage is to make it legal to punish religious believers who do not want to recognize or in any way participate in such activities, which they view as sins against God. Doctors who will not help lesbians have babies, photographers who will not shoot gay "weddings", and anyone who is outspoken in their condemnation of gay marriage or the gay lifestyle has been and will be punished by government, without regard to any actual harm to gays.

If states can regulate church governance, it will start giving itself a vote on church boards, and start charging for that "service". The left wing in America is not that far away from communist totalitarianism after all.
Published by: Sandy
RIchfield UT 03/10/2009 01:06 PM EST
Connecticut, it's high time you voted these two OUT of office. We as residents in other states can only stand by and watch helplessly as your constitutional rights are trampled. Time to grow a backbone and fight back regardless of the repercussions.
Published by: Sherri
Salt Lake City, Utah 03/10/2009 12:52 PM EST
I think the greater question is why the state believes it has the right to make a law of this nature. If it were the church dictating to the state in this same fashion, everyone would be up in arms. But reverse that and the same people that were calling for blood see it as a gray area. It doesn't matter that this incident was brought on because of theft by a dishonest priest, it is wrong for the state to meddle in religious affairs. I'm not a Catholic but I know if this is allowed to stand it can spread like cancer and my faith could be at risk too. There are already laws regarding theft that this particular priest can prosecuted under. Nothing new is necessary.
Published by: Nicole
Wa 03/10/2009 12:33 PM EST
Come on people! There are crooks in every group. Using one persons embezzlement to justify this act only proves that there are crooks in politics as well. (like that is a surprise)
Politicians can't wait for bad things to happen so they can "fix them". When are the politicians going to clean up their act and follow the Constitution? When we make them!
Published by: DOUGLAS COTANT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 03/10/2009 12:16 PM EST
This proposed bill violates not only the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, but also is an infringement on the Freedom of Religion. I am not Catholic, I do not approve of a State, that signed the Constitution when it was first proposed, that wants to barge into the Church's freedom of Religion. Those two State Legislative Birdbrains, and I use the term very librally, because that is what they are, need to study their State and Federal Constitution. They don't understand what the Constitution means when this document says: "Congress shall not establish a religion therof."
Published by: JW Morrison
CT 03/10/2009 10:07 AM EST
Men are fallible and will make mistakes. Still, the Constitution restricts government interference with religious organizations. The Church should have better oversight with audits just like any organization. The telling part is that these legislators have a biased viewpoint that most likely has nothing to do with what their Catholic constituents have to say but are using this example as an excuse.
Published by: Emalee
Cedar Hills, Utah 03/10/2009 08:18 AM EST
One priests actions do not represent the values and attitude of the entire church and should not be the basis of creating a bill. This bill is also in direct violation of the Constitution and should therefore be thrown in the trash where it belongs.
Published by: Bot
Santiago, Chile 03/10/2009 07:33 AM EST
Donations should be recorded by two competent individuals from each parish. Then they should transmit the results to the Bishop electronically. They they should deposit the funds in a local bank, which the Bishop controls. The Bishop should dispurse funds to each parish in accordance with their needs.
Published by: G C Koenig
Atlanta, Georgia 03/10/2009 07:20 AM EST
Although I am not a resident of Connecticut nor am I a Catholic, I strongly oppose any government intervention into the affairs of any legitimate church organization as a violation of the constitution. It is clear that these legislators have a biased cause they are using as an attack against the Catholic church, and that is totally out of order and their proposed legistation should be recognized for its real intent, and should be dismissed.
Published by: Scott
Canton, Michigan 03/10/2009 05:34 AM EST
This is quite sad and shocking when legislators try to shred the constitution in an effort to dictate and attack a religion for merely having the "audacity" to teach its values. Whether Christians try to mandate how homosexual organizations are run, or homosexuals trying to mandate how churches are run, either is quite antithetical to American values.
Published by: Stephen
Ogden/Utah/USA 03/10/2009 03:58 AM EST
I don't think I understand the legislation but it sounds like a very intrusive bill. It looks like if you defend traditional marriage, then you are on a hit list.
Published by: elle smith fagan
Vernon Connecticut USA 03/09/2009 10:41 PM EST
I live in Connecticut and am lifelong Catholic and there is expected to be a crowd at the State Capitol on Wednesday .
The issue is so evil and evilly motivated by men who have an evil reputation lifelong and yet if we fear confronting evil, it will confront and inundate us.

The issue is about the financial disaster scenario that motivated a bill that flies in the face of US Constitutional points on the separation of Church and State.

Most sound minds feel it won't get far, for that very reason, but many are afraid to fail to show support for the right side in it - it would not be the first time the bad guys won, because the good guys did not show up.

Please pray for us here.

elle
Published by: Clinton Smith
Princeton, NJ 03/09/2009 08:55 PM EST
Blatantly unconstitutional.
Published by: Dan in Calgary
Calgary Alberta Canada 03/09/2009 07:38 PM EST
I am forced to agree with Amos.

If American Catholic dioceses have traditionally carried on with their finances and financial reporting like most of the dioceses in Canada that I have been a part of, as a professional accountant I must say that these processes in Catholic organisations are typically anything but transparent, and far from being above reproach for lack of discipline, clarity and candor.

Had they been more disciplined and compliant with public standards of financial reporting, our Bishops would not have created this opening for American legislators.

I wonder whether the Canadian clergy will take timely warning from this development and self-impose better discipline and transparency upon their finances, before inviting Canadian state intervention?

Dan in Calgary
Published by: poptoy
Eunice, La. 03/09/2009 06:59 PM EST
ONLY 2 GODLESS HOMOSEXUALS WOULD THINK OF SUCH A THING.
Published by: Denise Robinson
Parker, Colorado USA 03/09/2009 05:00 PM EST
These two legislators should be removed from office immediately. This is a blatant violation of the Constitution. They shoud be impeached.
Published by: Chris
Linde, TX, USA 03/09/2009 04:41 PM EST
Father, forgive them. They know not what they are doing.

Throughout the entire history of the Church the Apostles sent clergy, the Apostles gave direction to the local church. A Bishop is an Apostle giving our Church a connection through history to the first Pope, Peter.

In the United States, a state government, or the federal government for that matter, has no legal standing in dictating religious canon.
Published by: Amos
Dayton, NJ 03/09/2009 02:26 PM EST
Rate: Good
I don't agree with any state meddling with the internal structure of a religious organization. Had the bishops tightened up the financial auditing of religious corporations under their auspices, such a bill would have been forestalled. Now, the bishops have another problem to deal with. Why are these men always a day late and a dollar short when it comes to cleaning up their act?
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa