Boston, Mass., Jul 10, 2010 / 05:18 am
In response to a federal judge in Massachusetts ruling that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional, critics of the move warned it could trigger “another culture war” and accused Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan and the Obama administration of having “deliberately sabotaged” their defense of the case.
On July 8, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Tauro ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in two cases brought by the state Attorney General Martha Coakley and a homosexual activist group.
In the case brought forward by Coakley, Judge Tauro declared that DOMA compels Massachusetts to discriminate against its own residents to receive federal funds for certain programs, the New York Times reported.
The other case, brought by Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), focused on the question of equal protection concerning a small number of federal benefits. The judge agreed that the federal law violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution by denying benefits to one class of “married couples,” homosexuals, but not others.