Denver bishop: Catholics must demand delivery from Obama on health care promises
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Auxiliary Bishop James Conley

.- Stressing that “there is very little time to act,” Bishop James Conley, the Auxiliary Bishop of Denver, told CNA in an exclusive interview on Monday that now is the time for President Obama to prove his critics wrong and show them that he really meant it when he said abortions would not be funded in the health care reform bill.

Bishop Conley added, “If we don't demand honesty from our public officials and responsiveness to the serious concerns of the Catholic community, nobody will do it for us -- and we, our beliefs and our institutions will be the losers.” The full interview between CNA and Bishop Conley follows.

CNA: The U.S. bishops are now calling on Catholics around the country to immediately contact their federal representatives and senators to demand changes in the health-care bill.  Why the urgency?

Bishop Conley: There's very little time to act.  Congress could try to push legislation to a vote within days.  All of the five main proposals currently under congressional discussion as of today, November 2, are fatally flawed.


CNA:  Why did the bishops wait so long to act?


Bishop Conley
: It depends on what you mean by "wait."  Keep in mind that the bishops have been urging health-care reform for decades.  And they've been vigorously engaged, personally and through their staffs, with informing their people about the key issues involved in reform this year.  They've also been active in trying to collaborate with Congress and the White House.  The Church wants to work with the president and Congress in ensuring basic health care for everyone in our country.  I think the bishops waited so long to turn to their people because they believed Congress would act responsibly.  They believed the president would keep his word about excluding abortion and abortion funding from any plan he signs.  That may still happen.  But I wouldn't count on it...  It's clear that not everyone we tried to work with in Washington was acting in good faith.


CNA: How could you summarize the USCCB's position on health care in general, and on the bills currently being discussed in Congress?

Bishop Conley: The Church regards basic health care for everyone as a right, not a privilege.  That's the principle, and it applies especially to the poor, the unborn child, the immigrant and the elderly.  Of course, those services can legitimately be delivered in many different ways.  That's a matter for elected officials to resolve.  That's their job.  The Catholic preference in approaching social problems is always toward subsidiarity.  In other words, problems should be handled by the people and resources closest to the problem, at the lowest possible level.  Government can certainly play a role in helping to solve the problems, and at times government involvement may be the only way to ensure justice.  But for Catholics, government action is never the first, or even the preferred way, of resolving a social problem.

Regarding the bills currently in Congress: The bishops have stressed all along that health-care reform needs to exclude abortion and its funding.  It needs to provide strong conscience protections for medical professionals and institutions.  Despite all the claims to the contrary, none of the bills currently facing Congress adequately addresses these needs.

Obviously, we also need a system we can pay for.  It needs to be grounded in economic reality, and financially sound.  That's also a moral issue, and every parent knows it from experience.  We can't help anyone if we're insolvent. 


CNA: President Obama, during his September 9 address to Congress on health care, promised that abortion would not be covered with federal tax dollars and that strong conscience protection would be included in his bill. Isn't this time for Catholics to address especially President Obama, as much as they should address Congress, to deliver on his promise?

Bishop Conley: I think many Catholics listened to the president back in September during his congressional address and were moved to believe in his good will, even if they hadn't voted for him.  The president's critics have claimed all along that he tells people what they want to hear, then finds reasons to do something quite different.  This is the moment when the president will prove his critics wrong -- or right.  The president is the leader of his party, and his party controls both houses of Congress.  It would use up very little of the White House's political capital to meet the health-care concerns of the Catholic community.  If the effort isn't made by the White House to meet our concerns, then we'll know the difference between shrewd marketing and real commitment when it comes to public eloquence about the "common ground."


CNA: Some Catholics suggest that health care reform should be supported even without the conditions proposed by the USCCB, since the goal of universal health care is a greater good. What would you answer to that?

Bishop Conley: The health of a society is never served by allowing or funding the killing of innocent life, beginning with the unborn child.  The common good is also never served by abusing the conscience rights and religious freedom of individuals and institutions. A good end never justifies morally compromised means.  Good intentions are the first victims of bad choices, and that applies just as forcefully to public policy as it does to personal behavior.


CNA: What would be the "worst case scenario" on this crucial issue and what are the Bishops considering doing?


Bishop Conley: I think the bishops are doing everything they can do.  The "worst case scenario" in the current health-care debate is faithful Catholic laypeople doing nothing, or underestimating the gravity of the problems in the pending federal health-care legislation.  If we don't demand honesty from our public officials and responsiveness to the serious concerns of the Catholic community, nobody will do it for us -- and we, our beliefs and our institutions will be the losers. 

Unless and until these very reasonable Catholic concerns are met, Catholics need to treat this legislation as dangerous and inadequate; work to defeat it; and failing that, press the president to veto it.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Ronn
Longmont CO USA 11/05/2009 07:36 PM EST
Excellent comments from Bishop Conley. WE Catholics need to stand for life period and do something, and regain our country at the ballot box. Catholics who support abortion should leave the church.
Published by: jim
austin, TX 11/03/2009 08:17 PM EST
'Consider this message from Planned Parenthood’s President, Cecile Richards to all Planned Parenthood supporters: “Because of relentless pressure from dedicated supporters like you, every version of the bills out there right now is free of the dangerous amendments anti-choice members of Congress tried to attach to health care reform….Tell your representatives to pass this crucial bill intact, and reject efforts to remove reproductive health care from health reform.” (E-mail dated October 30, 2009, via Jillstanek.com) '
Published by: A. J. Hicks
Oceanside, CA 11/03/2009 06:35 PM EST
I have great respect for Bishop Conley and his Archbishop and I have no problems with what he says. However, 40 years of watered-down Catholicism clearly showed its effects in the Catholic support for Obama. It will be interesting if the Bishops can now turn the "slide" of so many.
Published by: C.L.
Fresno, CA USA 11/03/2009 05:26 PM EST
Almost out of time.... Yes, the Bishops have been quiet... too quiet, for too long. TOO BAD--- NOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN? WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE? PRAYERS ARE DESPERATELY NEEDED,,, AND IMMEDIATE ACTION....
Published by: Leo
Lincoln, NE 11/03/2009 02:05 PM EST
We also need to hold our politicians accountable for a health care bill that would allow medical providers and related healthcare associates to opt of the provision of or referral for services that violate one's conscience: abortion, sterilization, artificial contraception, etc.
Published by: Joan L. Roccasalvo
Bronx 11/03/2009 01:45 PM EST
A group of pro-life clergy should demand a meeting with President Obama this week. Does the pro-life constituency know that Kim Gandy of NARAL has had more than ten visits with President Obama since he took office? Who, of the pro-lifers, has been invited to the White House? Is there any doubt that Ms Gandy discussed anything else but abortion-related issues? The ulterior motive of the public option is to include abortion-related matters into the package by whatever means. Hidden iis the intent and the stipulation that we the people will indeed pay for abortions.
Published by: Jeff
Portsmouth Va 11/03/2009 08:12 AM EST
Remember A bill can with enough votes go to the president and he can note veto it.
Published by: J, Shultz
Wichita 11/03/2009 08:11 AM EST
The government is not the answer to the health care issue. The church needs to step up and take care of the poor. That is what Christ wanted, not the government to do it. We have lost sight of Jesus' will for us, the people of God.
Published by: Joe DeVet
Houston, TX, USA 11/03/2009 08:10 AM EST
Obama: the truth is not in him. Take away the lie about not funding abortions, and you still have 100 lies told by him about the move to socialize medicine in the US. The way to demand truth from public officials is to show what happens to one in which the truth does not abide--turn him out at the earliest chance. Meantime, to strip him of his means to power, the perverse Democrat majorities in both houses of Congress.
Published by: Anna Z
Orlando Fl 11/02/2009 07:43 PM EST
Thank you Bishop Conley for stressing the urgency of the situation. I have contacted as many people as I can, and I know many of us are concerned and are acting upon this. I cannot even fathom having to pay taxes to support the gruesome murder of an innocent child. Ye, there are many people suffering without access to healthcare, nobody can question that, but we cannot lower ourselves to support murdering children. Nothing is worth that. At the hour of our death we will have to account for that and if you don't want to accept that, you are in complete denial and may God have mercy on you, for the mercy you did not show that little child. Our founding fathers must be looking down on us with extreme sadness. Is this what America and much of the world have come to? How do I explain the evilness occuring to my chldren? Please, if you still believe in goodness, don't ever lose hope. Pray and act now. It does matter.
Published by: zereeo
Tampa, FL 11/02/2009 07:13 PM EST
It's time for the bishops to demand that they, the bishops, go to their local parishes, in person, and deliver the message to the faithful. Same story again, just as they did before the presidential election. They were "calling" but nobody hear them. Maybe they were calling the wrong number! Dear bishops, with all due respect, You are not doing everything you can, if you did, I would have seen you on a Sunday mass, but I never did.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa