|
|
||||||||
|
Dobson rips Obama for intentionally distorting Scripture
![]() Sen. Barack Obama / Dr. James Dobson
Related articles:
.- After having launched an effort to reach out to religious conservatives, Barack Obama is being criticized for deliberately misinterpreting the Bible by Dr. James Dobson, president of Focus on the Family. The critique of Obama’s use of Scripture is part of a series that Dobson and Tom Minnery, senior vice president for government and public policy at Focus on the Family, are conducting on the two presidential candidates as the national elections approach. Interestingly, Tom Minnery told CNA that “we’re open to have Obama or McCain visit” the headquarters of Focus on the Family. Minnery also told the Associated Press that one of Obama’s aides recently suggested a meeting at the organization's headquarters. Focus on the Family sent an advance copy of the radio show to CNA, in which the two radio hosts analyze a speech Obama gave in June 2006 to the liberal Christian group, Call to Renewal Covenant for a New America. The speech came to Dobson’s attention, in part, because he is cited by Obama in the address. As Dobson kicked off the radio segment, he explained that it was being paid for by Focus on the Family’s Action, an affiliate whose donations are taxed, so it is able to address political issues. After discussing the number of Christians that make up the America’s population, Obama said, "Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama said. “Would we go with James Dobson's or Al Sharpton's?" referring to the controversial civil rights advocate. Another passage of the discourse that Dobson took issue with involved Obama’s questioning of how Christianity and the Bible should guide public policy. “Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus,” which Obama said suggests slavery is OK and eating shellfish is an abomination. “Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount?—a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application." “So before we get carried away, let’s start reading our Bibles now. Folks haven't been reading their Bibles," Obama said. Both radio show hosts were upset that Obama seemed to be intentionally fusing the teachings of the Old Testament with Jesus' teachings in the New Testament, contrary to the Christian belief that many of the Old Testament laws and practices were rendered obsolete by Jesus’ teachings. “I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology," Dobson said. “He is vastly confused about the details of biblical exposition; that he’s painting himself in this highly religious aura,” Minnery added. Dobson also pointed to another comment Obama made, which Dobson says means the presidential contender believes, “it is anti-democratic to believe or fight for moral principals from the Bible that are not supported by people of all faiths.” In the audio clip, Sen. Obama says, “Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concern into universal, rather than religion-specific values. What do I mean by this? It requires that their proposals be subject to argument and amenable to reason. …” According to Dobson, this means that “I can’t seek to pass legislation that bans partial-birth abortion because there are people in the culture who don’t see that as a moral issue. And if I can’t get everyone to agree with me, it is undemocratic to try to pass legislation that I find offensive to the Scripture. Now that is a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution. … We don’t have to go to the lowest common denominator of morality, which is what he’s suggesting.” "Am I required in a democracy to conform my efforts in the political arena to his bloody notion of what is right with regard to the lives of tiny babies?" Dobson said. “What he's trying to say here is unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe." Joshua DuBois, director of religious affairs for Obama's campaign, reacted to the criticism by saying that a full reading of Obama's speech shows he is committed to reaching out to people of faith and standing up for families. "Obama is proud to have the support of millions of Americans of faith and looks forward to working across religious lines to bring our country together," DuBois said. Dr. Dobson is in a unique position since he previously stated that he could not in good conscience vote for McCain. His main concern about the Republican contender is that he is not a true conservative. Dobson has said he will vote in November but has suggested he might not vote for president. Obama has been mobilizing religious leaders lately, including conservative evangelicals. His campaign has plans for thousands of "American Values House Parties," where participants discuss Obama and religion, as well as a presence on Christian radio and blogs. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Jeff
South Africa 11/19/2009 04:02 AM EST
I agree wholheartedly with Dr Dobson.President Obama is pushing his liberal,miguided,flawed understanding of Scripture onto all those who are like reeds in the wind.THEY ARE SADLY SWAYED BY EVERY WIND OF DOCTRINE.May the USA be saved and spared from these insiduous attacks on the Faith once delivered to the Saints.
Published by: Lisa
NJ 06/30/2008 02:40 PM EST
I wouldn't be surprised if Dr. Dobson changed his mind and supported John McCain after all. I pray that he does!
Published by: Mina
Canada 06/25/2008 02:05 PM EST
Obama is correct to show us that the Old and New Testaments complement each other and reference each other. It is true that some things have been changed by God/Jesus, but the Old Testament is still valid.
What I do not understand is, is if Obama is that good of a Bible reader, how come he promises freedom for abortion? God is about Life, not murder; the Ten Commandments says not to kill. Abortion is killing. So it would seem Obama might be confused or a hypocrite? I cannot judge anyone, but I am still confused over him.
Published by: Theo
Denver 06/25/2008 12:26 PM EST
Regarding the headline "Dobson rips Obama for intentionally distorting Scripture," it's a little disconcerting to see that kind of language used in the headline of a Catholic paper. It's commonplace to see violent imagery in mainstream news, but it would be nice not to have to see it in the Catholic press. Would be more charitable to say "Dobson Points Out . . . ", not "rips." Nasty image there. Just a suggestion from a long-time reader.
Published by: Orlando Garcia
NYC, NYS, USA 06/24/2008 05:03 PM EST
It is a good sign when citizens that happen to be Christians hold the politicians words and messages to the light so they give a honest and clear message; not just being gracious and accepting what they have to say but holding them accountable in a straight forward and mature manner.
Keep up the good work. We don't need flip floping candidates.
Published by: Ron Pichlik
Battle Creek, MI USA 06/24/2008 02:36 PM EST
Personally, I suspect that Mr. Obama is a nice guy, however, what people need to realize is that he may be a nice guy with quite a radical agenda for this country. The one thing that I do know about him with which I take great issue, is that going back to his days in the Illinois state congress, this man has never seen a piece of pro-abortion legislation that he wasn't able to find a way to support or fence-sit on. If this were all that I knew about Mr. Obama it is more than sufficient to keep me from voting for him.
For if you aren't willing to stand up for and protect the most vulnerable and innocent of human life than frankly your wasting your time with the rest of your proposed "do-gooder" laws. You are in fact like the foolish man who built his house on sand.
Published by: Voter
Mattoon/IL/USA 06/24/2008 02:32 PM EST
This brought a smile to my face. Obama was right on the money as usual. People like Dobson are fated for the dustbin of history and I think they're starting to figure it out.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
McCain would undoubtedly veto Freedom of Choice Act, Catholic leaders say Muslim organization calling on Obama to invite women to future rally Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

