House rejects amendment to ban same-sex marriage

.- The U.S. House of Representatives rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage on Tuesday, but House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., warned that the issue is not over, the Associated Press reported.

"For thousands of years the definition of marriage has been the union between one man and one woman. Marriage is the very foundation of our society where families are formed and communities are established," said Hastert in a statement.

"Today we are seeking to protect this vital institution as it is under attack by activist judges across the nation,” he continued. "It's unfortunate that more than a majority of democrats today have sided with these liberal judges and voted against this measure.”

The 236-187 vote was 47 short of the two-thirds majority needed to advance a constitutional amendment. While most all Republicans supported the amendment, it did not have enough support from Democrats to get a two-thirds vote. The Senate rejected the amendment last month, effectively killing it for this session of Congress. In 2004, the House vote was 227-186 in favor of the amendment.

The “no” vote came despite what is happening at the state level, where courts, legislatures and voters are accepting the same-sex marriage bans. Forty-five states have either constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage or statutes outlawing same-sex weddings.

Supporters of the federal amendment argued that Congress must trump the actions of judges who have ruled in favor of same-sex marriages.

President George Bush has also advocated that the ban be extended to the federal level.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said his group would help to make marriage an election issue in the fall. They will put out a voter scorecard that will include marriage.

"The overwhelming majority of the American people support traditional marriage," said Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R-Colo., sponsor of the amendment. "And the people have a right to know whether their elected representatives agree with them."

The proposed amendment said that, "marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither the Constitution, nor the constitution of any state, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman."

Ads by AdsLiveMedia(What's this?)

* The number of messages that can be online is limited. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages


Ads by Google (What's this?)

Featured Videos

A state without territory elects new government
A state without territory elects new government
The renewal of the Legionaries of Christ
Presentation of the book "The Pastor"
Synod on the Family October 2014
Preferential option for the poor
God is alive, even in sport
'A forbidden God' named Best Film at the International Catholic Film Festival
Vatican backs a 'Pause for Peace' during World Cup final
The effects of religious violence in Sarajevo 
The origin of Corpus Christi 
Corpus Christi at the Vatican 
Homage to an Indian Cardinal
Train of the Child's Light
New book explaining gestures of the Mass
Encounter between Pope Francis and the Charismatic Renewal in the Spirit Movement.
Religious tensions subside amid Balkan floods
John Paul II Center for Studies on Marriage and Family
Saint John Paul II on cartoon
Syrian Christian refugees
Papal Foundation Pilgrimage

Liturgical Calendar

July 24, 2014

Thursday of the Sixteenth Week in Ordinary Time

All readings:
Today »
This year »

Catholic Daily

Gospel of the Day

Mt 13:10-17


Daily Readings

First Reading:: Jer 2: 1-3, 7-8, 12-13
Gospel:: Mt 13: 10-17

Saint of the Day

St. Charbel Makhlouf »


Homily of the Day

Mt 13:10-17


Ads by AdsLiveMedia.com

Ads by AdsLiveMedia.com
Text only

Follow us: