|
|
||||||||
|
LA Times attributes pro-Obama Catholics’ statement to the USCCB
![]() LA Times confuses Korzen with the USCCB
Related articles:
.- In a November 8 article titled “House votes for ban on abortion subsidies,” the Los Angeles Times quoted a statement from the pro-Obama group Catholics United attributing it to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). The article in the LA Times, which remained uncorrected on Thursday evening, covered the final vote on the House health care bill and the previous passage of the Stupak amendment. "The amendment, offered just prior to the vote on the healthcare bill, passed 240 to 194,” wrote LA Times’ reporter Kim Geiger. Geiger then added: “The compromise won immediate support from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which urged Catholics to ‘lend their full-throated support’ to the Democrats' healthcare bill.” “‘The bishops' stamp of approval means that this bill is unambiguously pro-life and we will vigorously oppose those who suggest otherwise,’ the conference said in a statement Saturday,” Geiger added in the story. Nevertheless, the words attributed by the LA Times to the USCCB actually belong to a statement released by Chris Korzen, Executive Director of the independent, pro-Obama group Catholics United, which has supported the president’s health care bill even when the U.S. bishops where opposing it before the Stupak Amendment passed in the House. The quote mistakenly attributed by the LA Times to the USCCB is taken from the fifth paragraph of Korzen's statement, which was released late on Saturday. The Readers' Representative for the LA Times, Jamie Gold, told CNA via email that "a for-the-record will be forthcoming." The true USCCB statement, released on Monday, November 9, a day after the original LA Times story was published, was laudatory of the Stupak Amendment, but much less enthusiastic than Catholic United's on the health care bill. In the USCCB statement, Cardinal Francis George said the bishops were thankful that “the Representatives honored President Obama’s commitment to the Congress and the nation that health care reform would not become a vehicle for expanding abortion funding or mandates.” But the USCCB president also warned that “the Conference will remain vigilant and involved throughout this entire process to assure that these essential provisions are maintained and included in the final legislation.” “We remain deeply concerned about other aspects of health care reform as the debate now moves to the Senate, especially as it affects the poor and vulnerable, and those at the beginning and end of life. We will continue to insist that health care reform legislation must protect conscience rights. We support measures to make health care more affordable for low-income people and the uninsured. We remain deeply concerned that immigrants be treated fairly and not lose the health care coverage that they now have,” Cardinal George stated. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Francis Xavier T
Washington, D.C. 11/13/2009 04:44 PM EST
What makes you all think the L.A. Times "misreported" ?
Published by: Bill Snyder
Kissimmee/FL/USA 11/13/2009 03:13 PM EST
I still oppose the so-called "Public Option" which I consider socialized medicine and steals from professional agents. Pope Leo XIII condemned socialism in Rerum Novarum & Quod Apostolici Muneris.
Published by: Muriel
Newville, PA, USA 11/13/2009 02:42 PM EST
More than a mere correction is needed. Through this mistake the L.A. Times article presents an image of the USCCB as being in the tank for this bill. The Times should clarify that Catholics United is a pro-Obama group that is not an official body of the Catholic church, and that the USCCB, an official body of the Church, only conditionally supports this bill. Although I'm not a fan of the USCCB, who as a body seems too politically liberal to me, there is a world of difference between them and Catholics United. Since that's not readily apparent to anyone outside the faith (and sadly, to many within), the L.A. Times should take the extra steps necessary to undo the damage they've done to the reputation of the USCCB.
Published by: M
chantilly/VA/USA 11/13/2009 05:05 AM EST
So, the LATimes misreported this to make it look like ObamaCare was supported by the USCCB.
Do you think they will actually print a correction?
No -- not unless it suits their political motivations.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
02:58 pm | New film celebrating Year for Priests released in Rome 02:40 pm | Vatican paper: US bishops speak for Catholic Church on health care reform 01:51 pm | Catholic clergy look for faith renewal in Pope's UK visit 11:56 am | Apostolic visitors of Legion to meet with Vatican Secretary of State April 30 11:12 am | Pope to visit Queen, beatify Cardinal Newman during England visit Related news :
President Obama torn between promises to abortion foes and supporters on health care Cardinal George urges Senate to follow example of House on abortion Planned Parenthood says U.S. bishops have ‘hijacked’ health care reform with Stupak Amendment Florida lawmaker confident abortion restrictions will be stripped from health care bill Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

