|
|
||||||||
|
Lantos Commission hears about forced abortions in China before Obama visit
![]() Related articles:
.- After three decades of forced population control in China, Representative Chris Smith (R-N.J.) is calling on President Obama to take a stand for human rights in China, ahead of his Thursday trip to the country. On November 10, 2009, a panel of human rights activists spoke before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission about the Chinese government’s abusive stance towards women and the family. Contributors hoped to pass their concerns along to the president as he prepares for a trip to China this week. China has a policy limiting each family to one child. To enforce this policy, the Chinese government requires prospective parents to obtain a permit to have a child before they become pregnant, levies enormous fines on families who have more than one child, monitors women’s reproductive cycles, mandates birth control, and in some cases, forces abortions and sterilizations upon women. Nicholas Eberstadt, a policy expert from the American Enterprise Institute, told the commission, “We have seen the emergence of the one child family and the end of 2,500 years of the traditional Chinese family.” He testified that the current system has destroyed the centuries-old tradition of the Chinese family, as millions of children now have neither brothers and sisters nor aunts and uncles. Reggie Littlejohn, of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, called the one-child policy violence of individuals on an historic scale. She called on President Obama to take to heart his Nobel Peace Prize and act in defense of human rights. The organization ChinaAid presented electronic evidence to the Lantos Commission from a website for Chinese obstetricians and gynecologists, where doctors traded advice on how to perform late-term abortions and what to do if the baby survives the attempt on its life. One doctor suggested that the child's skull must be punctured and another that they be “left in trash cans.” Some contributors did express concern for the child's rights. Rep. Chris Smith, who is a senior Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Ranking Member on the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, stated, “Human rights are trivialized by China, and the United States has been sending a message that profits and money-making trumps human rights.” “On Thursday,” Smith noted, “President Obama travels to Asia, and will be in Beijing for four days of meetings.” “I hope he will not conduct these meetings in the same airy spirit that Secretary Clinton expressed on her first visit to China, when she dismissed the human rights of the Chinese people as irrelevant to her relationship with the Chinese government,” Smith stated. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Chris Gelken
Beijing 11/16/2009 12:33 AM EST
Purely in the spirit of setting the record straight. The one-child-policy was only applicable to the Han ethnic group - not the nation as a whole. It also was mainly aimed at urban residents, with many rural communities (Han or other ethnic group) falling outside the regulation. Consequently, only about 60 percent of the population was directly affected by the policy.
While not denying there may well have been instances such as described in the above article - and should be condemned in the strongest possible terms - the practice should not be considered as common, widespread or arbitrary by any means.
Published by: Elizabeth W.
Texas 11/12/2009 02:08 AM EST
Like it or not, Jeff Johnson, he IS your president. So quit with the condescending quotation marks. It just makes you look petty and undermines the significance of the message you advocate.
Published by: Matt
Australia 11/11/2009 07:13 PM EST
Why meddle the affairs of other countries if abortion itself is prevalent in the Western world? I'm not surprised if those who voiced their objection to this issue are pro-abortion themselves.
This brings to mind a Scriptural passage, "why see the speck in your neighbour's eye, but fail to see the log lodged in your own eyes."
Clean up the mess in the Western world before looking to clean up human rights in the Eastern world.
Published by: Jeff Johnson
Collegeville, MN 11/11/2009 03:54 PM EST
We face a mild impediment here. "President" Obama has his own abusive stance towards women and the family.
If he has historically refused to defend the endless dignity and human rights of unborn children in American, how can we possibly expect him to do so elsewhere.
He has already sent millions to other countries to fund their abortion programs. Only when we stand up to him and all other pro-abortionists will this bloodshed stop.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
Growth in world population does not lead to more hunger, says FAO director Responding to report, pro-life leader insists people are not pollution Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

