Massachusetts House repeals law restricting same-sex marriages to residents
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Governor Patrick Deval

.- In what marriage advocates called “part of a cynical strategy to inflict same-sex marriage on the unwilling citizens of other states,” the Massachusetts House on Tuesday voted by a margin of 119 to 36 to repeal a 1913 law that blocked marriage licenses from being granted to same-sex couples from out-of-state.

The Senate approved the repeal earlier in July, meaning the measure now requires one more procedural vote in each chamber of the legislature before it is sent to Governor Deval Patrick, who has said he will sign the measure.

Massachusetts became the first state to permit homosexual marriage in 2004, but then-Governor Mitt Romney ordered town and city clerks to follow a 1913 law that prohibits couples from marrying if the unions would be illegal in their home states.

At the time, Romney argued that repealing the law would turn the state into the “Las Vegas of gay marriage.”

The Catholic Action League denounced the House vote in a Tuesday statement, calling it “part of a cynical strategy to inflict same-sex marriage on the unwilling citizens of other states without the consent of the electorate.”

C. J. Doyle, Executive Director of the Catholic Action League, argued the legislation will allow homosexual couples to litigate to overturn existing marriage laws in other states which prohibit same-sex marriage.

“Once again, the judiciary will be used to evade the legislative process and circumvent the ballot box,” Doyle stated. “Ironically, by voting for this measure today, Massachusetts legislators may undermine the ability of their counterparts in other states to exercise that same right on this issue.”

Doyle also lamented Catholic politicians’ involvement in passing the law.

“Today, a majority of Catholics in the Massachusetts House of Representatives voted again in favor of homosexual marriage. There is a growing sense of outrage among faithful Catholics over the conduct of nominally Catholic politicians who repudiate fundamental Catholic moral teachings about the sanctity of human life and the integrity of traditional marriage. There is also a growing sense of urgency that this scandal must be brought to an end.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Clay J.
Ohio, USA 08/01/2008 01:04 PM EST
Respectful Catholic politicians understand gay people are seeking the legal and equal freedom to marry the person they love and care for, just as non-gay Americans do. They understand the needs of their constituants. They know the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection and the right to marry belongs to us all. This is not about forcing the Church to perform or extend religious recognition to ANY marriages it doesn't want to. This is about the right to the civil marriage license issued by the state of Massachusetts, which Catholic groups should not interfere with (just as the state should not interfere with our religious ceremonies one way or the other).
The Bishop should focus on Catholics.
Published by: Thomas Farrell
United States 08/01/2008 11:24 AM EST
As California already allows gay and lesbian citizens of any state to marry there, Massachusetts' action changes exactly nothing on the national level. Implying otherwise seems disingenuous.

And I don't see how this "evades the legislative process" since this is an action taken by the legislature - a legislature elected AFTER gay marriage was legalized in MA. So, the citizens have had every opportunity to act at the ballot box.
Published by: WM
US 07/31/2008 11:28 AM EST
This isn't a scandal for the Church. Those politicians claiming to be Catholics, aren't. They have chosen to separate themselves from the Church and the Bishop should make that clear to the media.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa