|
|
||||||||
|
Michelle Obama praises husband’s support for homosexual causes
![]() Michelle Obama
Related articles:
.- Michelle Obama, wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, on Thursday told the Democratic National Committee’s Gay and Lesbian Caucus that her husband wants to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and reverse the rule on homosexuals in the military. Cybercast News Service reports that Michelle Obama began her speech by praising the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down anti-sodomy laws. Because of the decision, she said, "same-sex couples would never again be persecuted through the use of criminal law." “We are all only here because of those who marched and bled and died, from Selma to Stonewall,” she said. Selma, Alabama was the starting point of a famous civil rights movement, while The Stonewall Inn, a bar in Greenwich Village, New York, was where a 1969 gay and lesbian riot against police officers marked what many believe to be a turning point in the homosexual rights movement. Michelle Obama said her husband supports “a world where federal laws don't discriminate against same-sex relationships” and he advocates equal treatment for “any relationship recognized under state law.” “That is why he has said the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide for themselves how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples -- whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union or a civil marriage,” Obama said to the DNC’s Gay and Lesbian Caucus. A position paper on the Barack Obama campaign’s website says the candidate wants to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman and also states that a homosexual marriage in one state does not have to be recognized in another state. The repeal of the federal law could mean that the more than 40 states that have statutory or constitutional bans on same-sex marriage would be required to recognize a homosexual marriage license from another state as a legally binding contract. The Obama campaign’s position paper also states Obama’s desire to enact legislation that would ensure the “1,100-plus federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally recognized union.” Lynn Wardle, a law professor at Brigham Young University, told Cybercast News Service it is likely this statement references the federal definition provision that, if so modified, would extend Social Security and other government benefits to same-sex couples. This, Wardle said, could effectively nationalize same-sex marriages. “If a judge in San Francisco says 'for Social Security purposes, that's the law,' then a trial judge in San Francisco could affect the whole country,” she told Cybercast News Service. Sen. Obama’s opponent, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. He joined Obama in opposing a federal constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman, saying he believed states should decide on the matter. McCain supported a 2006 state constitutional amendment defining marriage as a heterosexual institution in his home state of Arizona, but the amendment failed in the November election. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Phyllis
Canton/MI/USA 12/07/2009 12:53 PM EST
I had a brother who was a homosexual. I was the first person he "came out" to. I was the only family member that "lived with" him. I saw him up-front and personal. We were very close and I loved him. I saw his friends, his lifestyle and the bars he frequented.
They did not look so happy. They looked confused. Some of the men dressed up as if they were women, wanted to be women, didn't identify with their maleness but femininity.
Years later, as a research reporter I began to thoroughly research homosexuality's origins in the individual.
I was saddened to discover that while wishful thinking that they were "born" that way, the truth is they were "made" that way-not by God but by circumstances totally out of their control.
Most have either not bonded to their same-sex parent, not had a consistent same-sex positive role model, or were sexually assaulted/molested/abused. Their psyche&brain changed.
It's so obvious and not a stereotype, just factual.
The sexually molested females end up hating their male perpetrators(henceforth, all men) and escape to other women all the while adopting the tough male exterior appearance to shield themselves; while the male victims end up loving other males and the majority self-identify with their injured self, their victim mindset they reverted to, femininity.
Others become hypersexed represented by leather clad muscle men you find at S.F. Gay Parade.
My brother died of Aids, derived from homosexual acts.
Published by: Real Truth
NJ 07/19/2009 07:45 AM EST
Reading comments, it's clear of people's self empowering religious desires over equality. The Old Testament is filled with misunderstandings, incorrect translations and adding of words that did not exist. It Mitharaism origins are also clear. Christianity and Religion is not a controllign factor of a free nation, and if it does then it is tiem to stand up agaisnt such power that separate mankind through fear hate and pure ignorance and not the will of the TRUE creator. Don't be lost in the laws of a self empowering Israel, and not understand true commitment and love. IF yo udeny GAys the same rights and benifits, then in order to satisfy the constitution and laws of the nation, your special rights as a married heterosexual couple will eb removed, and you can claim marriage through your church but not receive any special Federal or state rights for being married. One or the other WILL happen. Gays do not need to be married in a church that opposes it, nor will they desire to be married on a roof of bigotry and false word. So don't worry about anyone imposing on it. True commitment and loe is somehing many lack, and have no right to judge. I myself know what it means to love someone for the very essence of who they are, and bound not them in a way many will never experience. Once again be VERY carefull on your stance on this, because you may loose rights yourself, because 1 of the 2 must be met to satisfy the laws of this nation. Deny the rights and you shall give up your own.
Published by: Mystery Man
refuse, info 05/01/2009 09:28 PM EST
The idea to allow homosexual people in the military will screw up our country. The men and the women in the military have to be around each other all the time. There will be sexual harrassment charges filed back to back now. People of America, we're screwed.
Published by: Hope
USA 07/18/2008 10:22 PM EST
Good Christians love the sinner, but hate the sin.
It is a sin to indulge in homosexual activity. To expect the Church to condone that is ridiculous! The Church is Not a political hate machine, it is a "spiritual love machine" - love neighbor, love God by doing good in obeying His commandments.
Published by: will
oregon 07/15/2008 10:31 AM EST
You forget that Jesus said true worshipers of God will worship him in TRUTH and spirit.
And that he chastises those he loves. God loves all men and desires they turn to him.At the same time Sin brings judgement. Remeber what John wrote "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: 1Jo 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for [the sins of] the whole world. 1Jo 2:3 ¶ And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. 1Jo 2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.' To state that something is Sin doesn't mean it is disrespect.It means that there is a problem that needs to be corrected.If it in't corrected the sinner falls under the wrath of God. Jude wrote: "Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort [you] that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. Jud 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ."
Published by: Rich
NJ, USA 07/07/2008 09:39 PM EST
It is quite evident that the Obama's claim to be Christians but do not follow biblical teachings.
Published by: Hugh Vincelette
Vancouver , Canada 07/03/2008 05:35 PM EST
No conservative Christian group hs ever shown anything resembling respect for homosexuality, which is about love.They have thus demonstrated the fact that talk of human dignity is nothing more than empty platitudes.
Published by: Joan L. Roccasalvo
Bronx, NY 07/03/2008 05:13 PM EST
Mrs. Obama's speech calls for wider publicity than just in the CNA. On this Friday evening, media reportage of her controversial speech has been ignored by the media.
Published by: Brother Dominic
Boston 07/03/2008 05:33 AM EST
Good for her. More people should learn by their example of caring and loving. Our Catholic church has turned into a political hate machine, and is using homosexuals as scape goats because of the sexual abuse scandals. Learn by Jesus' example, and love on another. Life is too short for so much hatred.
LEARN TO LOVE! Brother Dominic
Published by: Brian
Indianapolis, IN, USA 07/02/2008 08:03 PM EST
Sadly, traditional society really did outlaw interracial relationships as well as homosexual conduct. Traditional society really did enshrine white supremacy. Is there a third option aside from legitimizing homosexual conduct or going back to the so-called good old days wholesale? Yes, but I'm afraid that the climate of the Culture Wars hides that third option.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
Ad asks Obama: ‘If fatherhood begins at conception, when does life begin?’ Obama-Dobson argument a “political blunder” for Obama Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

