|
|
||||||||
|
New pro-life campaign will insist that abortion is not health care
![]() Rev. Patrick Mahoney
Related articles:
.- Pro-life advocates hoping to ensure that abortion is not furthered in proposed health care legislation are planning a campaign of public prayer vigils, rallies, lobbying and demonstrations urging “Abortion is Not Health Care.” The campaign is scheduled to begin on September 12, with a large rally and 28 hours of prayer beginning September 13 on the West Lawn of the Capitol in Washington, D.C. According to a press release from the campaign, it is being organized by the Christian Defense Coalition and other national pro-life organizations. Campaign goals include ensuring that taxpayer money is not used to pay for abortion and that conscience protections are maintained for healthcare providers who decline to perform abortions. Organizers also hope to prevent federal mandates which require health plans to cover abortions and to prevent the invalidation of state laws restricting abortions. Further, they insist that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the U.S., should never become an “essential community health provider.” Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition, said that stopping the “Obama/Pelosi health care plan” was “the most critical program on the pro-life agenda” because in his view it includes taxpayer funded abortions. “If abortion becomes part of a health care entitlement, it will add at least 25 years to our struggle toward ending the violence of abortion in America,” he added. If the bill is passed, he said, “pro-life Catholics and Evangelicals would be forced to pay for abortions. People of good will who believe that human rights begin in the womb would have to pay for the brutal crushing of that innocent life.” He added that health care is supposed to heal and not destroy innocent life. Rev. Mahoney predicted that the Abortion is Not Health Care campaign will be a “public and prophetic witness.” Last week a U.S. House committee approved the Capps Amendment, which would allow the public health plan to cover abortion but without using federal funds. Instead, it would use dollars from beneficiary premiums. Douglas Johnson, legislative director for National Right to Life, attacked the proposal as a “sham” and “a bookkeeping scheme.” “The plan pays for abortion, and the government subsidizes the plan,” he commented. According to the Associated Press, because abortion is a legal medical procedure, experts on both sides of the debate say that not mentioning it in the bill would allow health care plans in the new insurance exchange to provide unrestricted coverage. "We want to see people who have no health insurance get it, but this is a sticking point," Richard Doerflinger, associate director of pro-life activities for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, told the Associated Press. "We don't want health care reform to be the vehicle for mandating abortion." Abortion proponents have argued that a federal health care plan which refuses to cover abortions will deny coverage for those who have it through workplace insurance, where it is claimed to be widely available. An Allan Guttmacher Institute study has claimed that nearly 90 percent of private insurers covered abortion procedures in 2002, but that figure has been called into question because it includes non-elective abortions. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in 2003 found that 46 percent of workers in employer plans had abortion coverage, the Associated Press says. Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for the insurance industry trade association America’s Health Insurance Plans, told the Congressional Quarterly that most insurers offer plans that include abortion coverage but most employers choose not to offer it as part of their benefits package. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Dennis
Brandon, MS USA 08/13/2009 05:50 PM EST
I fail to understand the logic of this statement:
"Abortion proponents have argued that a federal health care plan which refuses to cover abortions will deny coverage for those who have it through workplace insurance, where it is claimed to be widely available." The statement is only true if the worker loses their workplace-provided health insurance or the worker decides not to participate in that plan. In either case abortion advocates want the government plan to provide all coverage that exist in the workplace-provided health plans. Otherwise, the statement means that federal health insurance coverage trumps what you have in your private health insurance coverage. It seems to me that the abortion advocates are misleading everyone.
Published by: amanda
las vegas 08/11/2009 06:42 PM EST
Has our country really come to this?
I am not going to lie ... I am scared for the future of my children (if i ever do decided to have any due to these new factors)
Published by: Elisa
Maryland 08/07/2009 12:19 PM EST
Last month I saw a silent sidewalk pro-life protest in Chicago. One sign read that abortion isn't health care. Good! I was glad to see those folks there, making a stand for life.
Published by: Linda
NY 08/07/2009 02:25 AM EST
Well, States parties should ensure that measures are taken to prevent coercion in regard to fertility and reproduction, and to ensure that women are not forced to seek unsafe medical procedures such as illegal abortion because of lack of appropriate services in regard to fertility control.
Published by: Regina Elliott
Swannanoa,NC,USA 08/06/2009 03:02 PM EST
I refuse to pay through
taxes or any other means for the coverage of abortion.
Published by: m vale
gainesville, ga 08/06/2009 01:10 PM EST
This healthcare bill is a bad bill. Why don't we help low income people get healthcare insurance with their tax rebates?
We do not want to encourage or pay for abortions and we do not want Catholic hospital to be forced to commit abortions.Vote no for this bill.
Published by: John
England 08/06/2009 09:30 AM EST
On September 12th, in Washington DC? Sounds like this is to coincide with the massive March on Washington that is happening on the same day, in the same place. The 12th is going to be a day to remember - I just wonder how the media will downplay and spin the occasion.
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe 08/06/2009 06:47 AM EST
Good plan of attack---could be a game changer if enough people use their little noggins and come to an epiphany---'ah, right, brutal crushing of innocent life can't be health care'.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
07:45 pm | Archdiocese of Mexico City: Supreme Court should revoke law on same-sex unions 06:41 pm | U.S. bishops oppose Senate health care bill, doubt promised fixes 05:16 pm | Archbishop encourages young people to help reverse 'vocational winter' 04:38 pm | Unity will only come from God, Pope says to Lutherans 03:21 pm | Family policy expert denounces plan to promote condoms at schools in Spain Related news :
Abortion must be left out of heath care reform, Carl Anderson stresses Tim Ryan's bishop opposes his abortion bill over contraception Capps amendment is a 'phony compromise,' Rep. Stupak says Catholic congressman: I'd rather save my soul than vote for the health care bill Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

