Obama overturns Mexico City Policy, pro-lifers react
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

President Barack Obama

.- Pro-life leaders reacted critically to President Barack Obama’s Friday reversal of President George W. Bush’s ban on federal funding for international groups that promote or perform abortions. One Latin American commentator charged that the policy weakens anti-poverty efforts and had enabled a coercive sterilization campaign in Peru under the Clinton administration.

The ban, known as the Mexico City Policy, earned its name from a population conference that took place in the Mexican capital in 1984, where it was introduced by President Ronald Reagan. It was reversed by President Bill Clinton in 1993 and then reinstated by President Bush in 2001.

Controversy particularly focuses upon the mission of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), where an estimated $461 million at stake.

Critics supportive of abortion have characterized the Mexico City Policy as a “gag rule.”

"Women's health has been severely impacted by the cutoff of assistance,” argued Tod Preston, a spokesman for the advocacy group Population Action International, according to Fox News. “President Obama's actions will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, abortions and women dying from high-risk pregnancies because they don't have access to family planning."

Pro-life advocates were critical of the policy reversal.

Carlos Polo, a Peruvian who is Director for Latin America of the Population Research Council, asked “Where is Obama’s promise to fight poverty in order to reduce the number of abortions?”

He predicted the consequences of the new policy, telling CNA:

“The money that USAID has been distributing to fight poverty, relief hunger and droughts, will end up in the pockets of feminist and pro-abortion organizations to push the legalization of abortion in our countries.”  

“The hard-earned American tax payers’ money will be diverted from poor children and women to the fat salaries of feminist leaders. 

“This is not a potential scenario; it is exactly what happened in South America during the Clinton administration, when he reversed the Mexico City policy.  

“In Peru during those years, USAID financed the most brutal, compulsory campaign of sterilizations, with the open support of feminist, pro-abortion organizations, despite the fact that poor, peasant women were the victims of the campaign.”

Polo reported that international outcry forced USAID to end its funding of then-President Alberto Fujimori’s sterilization campaign.

“But by then, thousands of women, most of them in their late teens and early 20s had been sterilized, and several died as a consequence of the procedure.”

The reversal of the Mexico city policy, Polo said, “clearly demonstrates that President Obama is not interested in fighting poverty to reduce abortions, and that there is no possible common ground with those who want to fight for the right to life.

“President Obama has chosen to do exactly the opposite in the poorest countries: increase abortions and reduce help for the poorest.”

Fr. Thomas Euteneur of Human Life International told CNA the change of policy was “expected.”

“It is standard operating procedure for people who are adamant promoters of the culture of death and seek to impose the culture of death on the rest of the world through our tax dollars.

“It is both very harmful and dangerous,” he added.

According to Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president’s action signals the beginning of the “abortion bailout.”

“Abortions here in the U.S. are at their lowest number in years -- so it's unfortunate that President Obama is poised to make subsidizing abortion abroad one of his first priorities,” she remarked in a statement. 

Austin Ruse, director of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, also opposed the move, telling CNA:

“One of the abortion questions that is almost unanimous in America is that we do not want federal funds being spent on abortions. By striking down the Mexico City policy, President Obama gives lie to the claim that he wants fewer abortions. In fact, he is the most pro-abortion President in the history of the Republic. Those so-called pro-life Catholics who supported Obama have a lot to answer for.”

Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), characterized the action as the first in an “anticipated series of attacks” on longstanding pro-life policies opposed by President Obama’s “sweeping abortion agenda.”

He suggested that the agenda includes the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits taxpayer funding of abortion.

“President Obama not long ago told the American people that he would support policies to reduce abortions, but today he is effectively guaranteeing more abortions by funding groups that promote abortion as a method of population control," Johnson said.

“Obama's order will predictably result in a redirection of funds to groups such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which are ideologically committed to the doctrine that abortion on demand must be universally available as a birth control method,” Johnson further charged.

Stephen Mosher, President of the Population Research Institute, predicted possible political fallout for Obama:

“By signing a series of pro-abortion Executive Orders, President Obama will be perceived as governing from the Left. The die will be cast, and pro-lifers will rally against him from that moment. They will start looking towards 2010 to restore some checks and balances on this man they will rightly perceive as a pro-abortion zealot. 

“Clinton's pollster argued strongly against acting on abortion policy as one of the new administration's first pieces of business, but he went ahead regardless. The debacle of the 1994 House elections for the Democrats began at that moment.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Bob
Gainesville/Florida/USA 08/10/2009 06:59 AM EST
Obama does not make decisions based on the Bible. He may be a Muslim or an Atheist. Those of you that elected him, Thanks for nothing!
Published by: Kevin
oklahoma 02/05/2009 02:04 PM EST
I think Obama is trying to cut down on illegal allens. This is not the way to do it.Obama supporters enjoy the change.Come on 2010.We need a BIG change in congress.Vote smart use your heart
Published by: dave
San Diego/CA/USA 01/27/2009 02:15 PM EST
If the church had any backbone and true spiritual direction, it would have denounced both candidates for various different reasons. Neither adhered to the teachings of the church. So, for you all to sit here and bash a president on the basis of one single issue that will never be solved through political means, just shows the rest of the world how completely shallow your spiritual commitment is. Take a long hard look at yourself people, and then try very hard to shut your trap, and set an example by actually living your beliefs. Maybe you'll rub off on someone in a positive way.
Published by: anonymous
kansas 01/25/2009 08:52 PM EST
I would like to encourage everyone to practice the Christian principles when dealing with this. Pope Benedict is providing us with the proper attitude and actions to deal effectively with this issue. (Notice how he and the Bishops send letters to President Obama?)

I would like to encourage everyone to write to your representitives and to President Obama. They need for us to share and teach Catholic values with them. There are many websites online which make it very easy to contact your representitives. Catholic Charities USA, and Congress.org are places where I recommend to write from. Showing respect is important in making a positive impact.

Can anyone think of other positive suggestions on how to effectively deal with this? This is a good place to list them.
Published by: geronimo
United States of Abortion 01/25/2009 08:37 PM EST
And what is Doug Kmiec's reaction?
Published by: jacie
hibbing, mn, US 01/25/2009 02:21 PM EST
Any now believe he is a false prophet, opening the way for the antichrist
Published by: Pro life Mom
Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA 01/24/2009 10:33 AM EST
Let's thank our fellow Catholic parishioners that voted for President Obama. Yesterday, as he promised to do during the election, Obama overturned President Bush's ban on funding foreign agencies that promote and provide abortions. This means that, during this recessionary time, our hard-earned tax dollars will be used to pay for abortions. In addition, the new President signed an executive order funding FETAL stem cell research. So the next time you attend Mass, don't forget to thank our fellow parishioners with the Obama - "hope and change" bumper stickers.

Thank them for putting their heads in the sand and voting for someone that will use our tax dollars to fund an intrinsic evil.

Thank them for ignoring the moral teachings of the Catholic Church and its Catechism.

Thank them for helping to bring about this wonderful change - on behalf of the aborted babies that we're paying to kill.
Published by: Joseph
Roma, Lazio, Italia 01/24/2009 06:47 AM EST
Um, why are people surprised? His support groups were pushing for stuff like this! If you bring a wolf into a sheep pasture, don't be surprised at the results!
Published by: John Parish
Florida USA 01/24/2009 06:43 AM EST
The answer to the abortion question is abstinence. If people would adhere to the moral law and practice celibacy until they are married, the "need" for abortion would be greatly reduced. It would be better to pretend that the abortion procedure did not exist. But people want to have their cake and eat it, too, don't they? Anyone who interferes with the transmission of life is acting in contradiction with the Will of Heaven. Not a good place to be. Especially at this time. Make your robes white while there is still time. JOHN
Published by: Jeff Wynne
Quakertown PA 01/24/2009 01:36 AM EST
We have a rough idea of the body count for abortions within our country, about 50 million in 36 years. We will never know the body count of the abortions we funded abroad. People talk about the Bush legacy, but now commences the Obama legacy. The voters who downplay abortion on the scale of political priorities have their legacy, too. Now my hard earned money is going to finance the murder of my brothers & sisters around the world in-utero. I'm so ashamed to be an American today.
Published by: Michael Sales
Kapa'a HI, USA 01/24/2009 12:50 AM EST
Who put this picture up?!
Published by: Telemachus
Laramie, WY 01/23/2009 10:06 PM EST
So it begins... TO THE BARRICADES!
Published by: Rose
Salt Lake City, Ut 01/23/2009 08:52 PM EST
We don't have the money for this. The country is falling apart, becoming socialist and effete, and we are sending money out of the country to kill babies.
Published by: Michael
Singapore 01/23/2009 08:36 PM EST
Well, it is the choice of the American people who voted for him via
the electoral college votes.

You have to live with your choice of the president's decisions.
Blood will be in your hands, America!!
Published by: HG
FL 01/23/2009 08:19 PM EST
What can we expect from this guy? He is the biggest liar from the beginning and seems that many people are under his spell! He is thumbing his nose against the Author of life!
Published by: Pam Stone
USA 01/23/2009 07:11 PM EST
Bravo, President Obama!
Published by: Jeff Johnson
Collegeville, MN 01/23/2009 07:02 PM EST
Our nightmare deepens.

And it is hard to forget that millions of Catholics voted for this, and the worse things to come as Obama fulfills his unbecoming promises to NARAL, Emily's List and Planned Parenthood.
These Catholics assented to this.

Reflexively, they claim not to be single issue voters; here the truth of the word "holocaust" is dimly signed and signified by the euphemistic "issue."

Kind of like how murder is subsumed as "reproductive rights."

May God forgive this country.
Published by: Jamika
England 01/23/2009 07:00 PM EST
This was to be expected from the politician with the most pro-abortion record in the senate. Makes all his words about hope and responsibility seem rather hollow.

Nevertheless, the pro-life movement will eventually win the day, even if it takes decades longer. William Wilberforce should be an example to all pro-lifers of someone who fought against the tide to secure important victories in human rights.
Published by: Jack
Indiana 01/23/2009 06:38 PM EST
Obama is not for the people and not about the people. He is paying back the devil (via Planned Parenthood and other players in the culture of death) for his election. The devil is for death. God is for life. There is no in-between! Obama has sided with the dark side!
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe/NM/US 01/23/2009 06:20 PM EST
Clearly Pro-Life American will now more than ever need to pray and assist with grass-roots efforts. We are truely a stranger in a strange land.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa