Loading
Prop. 8 opponents object to making disclosures already required of Prop. 8 supporters

.- Although the same actions have been required of their adversaries, opponents of Proposition 8 have objected to a federal judge’s ruling that they must turn over internal campaign materials to the lawyers of Prop. 8 supporters.

The successful California ballot measure which restored the definition of marriage is being challenged in court. The challenge is the first federal case examining whether reigning interpretations of the U.S. Constitution bar states from outlawing same-sex “marriages.”

On Monday U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said sponsors of Prop. 8 were entitled to the information as evidence in their defense against the challenge to the ballot measure, the Associated Press reports.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Equality California, two of the groups affected by the decision, said they are reviewing the judge’s order to determine whether to appeal it. They had argued that the campaign materials were irrelevant and said it was unfair to burden them with the expense of searching through tens of thousands of old e-mails.

Geoffrey Kors, Equality California's executive director, said they believe the decision is incorrect.

"A core issue in the case is whether the motivation of those who put Prop. 8 on the ballot is animus. Why people opposed Prop. 8 is not relevant," he said, according to the Associated Press.

Protect Marriage, a sponsor of Prop. 8, has already been required to hand over similar materials to lawyers representing the plaintiffs in the case.

Judge Walker said Magistrate Joseph Spero had taken substantial steps to make the Prop. 8 opponents’ task easier. He said they failed to substantiate their argument that the magistrate’s order imposes an “undue burden.”

An appointee of President George H.W. Bush, Judge Walker is himself homosexual, the San Francisco Chronicle has reported.

The proceedings in the trial of Prop. 8 have been on hiatus because Judge Walker wanted to review the evidence before scheduling closing arguments.

On Monday he gave Protect Marriage’s lawyers until April 12 to submit their remaining evidence.


Ads by AdsLiveMedia(What's this?)

* The number of messages that can be online is limited. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages

RESOURCES »

Ads by Google (What's this?)

Featured Videos

3D Church mapping
3D Church mapping
#PAUSEforPeace Initiative
Dedicating art to San Juan de la Cruz
A state without territory elects new government
The renewal of the Legionaries of Christ
Presentation of the book "The Pastor"
Synod on the Family October 2014
Preferential option for the poor
God is alive, even in sport
'A forbidden God' named Best Film at the International Catholic Film Festival
Vatican backs a 'Pause for Peace' during World Cup final
The effects of religious violence in Sarajevo 
The origin of Corpus Christi 
Corpus Christi at the Vatican 
Homage to an Indian Cardinal
Train of the Child's Light
New book explaining gestures of the Mass
Encounter between Pope Francis and the Charismatic Renewal in the Spirit Movement.
Religious tensions subside amid Balkan floods
John Paul II Center for Studies on Marriage and Family
Jul
30

Liturgical Calendar

July 30, 2014

Wednesday of the Seventeenth Week in Ordinary Time

All readings:
Today »
This year »

Catholic Daily

Gospel of the Day

Mt 13:44-46

Gospel
Date
07/30/14
07/29/14
07/28/14

Daily Readings


First Reading:: Jer 15: 10, 16-21
Gospel:: Mt 13: 44-46

Saint of the Day

St. Peter Chrysologus »

Saint
Date
07/29/14

Homily of the Day

Mt 13:44-46

Homily
Date
07/30/14
07/29/14
07/28/14

Ads by AdsLiveMedia.com

Ads by AdsLiveMedia.com
     HTML
Text only
Headlines
  

Follow us: