Loading
Prop. 8 opponents object to making disclosures already required of Prop. 8 supporters

.- Although the same actions have been required of their adversaries, opponents of Proposition 8 have objected to a federal judge’s ruling that they must turn over internal campaign materials to the lawyers of Prop. 8 supporters.

The successful California ballot measure which restored the definition of marriage is being challenged in court. The challenge is the first federal case examining whether reigning interpretations of the U.S. Constitution bar states from outlawing same-sex “marriages.”

On Monday U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said sponsors of Prop. 8 were entitled to the information as evidence in their defense against the challenge to the ballot measure, the Associated Press reports.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Equality California, two of the groups affected by the decision, said they are reviewing the judge’s order to determine whether to appeal it. They had argued that the campaign materials were irrelevant and said it was unfair to burden them with the expense of searching through tens of thousands of old e-mails.

Geoffrey Kors, Equality California's executive director, said they believe the decision is incorrect.

"A core issue in the case is whether the motivation of those who put Prop. 8 on the ballot is animus. Why people opposed Prop. 8 is not relevant," he said, according to the Associated Press.

Protect Marriage, a sponsor of Prop. 8, has already been required to hand over similar materials to lawyers representing the plaintiffs in the case.

Judge Walker said Magistrate Joseph Spero had taken substantial steps to make the Prop. 8 opponents’ task easier. He said they failed to substantiate their argument that the magistrate’s order imposes an “undue burden.”

An appointee of President George H.W. Bush, Judge Walker is himself homosexual, the San Francisco Chronicle has reported.

The proceedings in the trial of Prop. 8 have been on hiatus because Judge Walker wanted to review the evidence before scheduling closing arguments.

On Monday he gave Protect Marriage’s lawyers until April 12 to submit their remaining evidence.

* The number of messages that can be online is limited. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages

RESOURCES »

Featured Videos

Group launches tour to end abortion in Canada
Group launches tour to end abortion in Canada
Actor admires Mexican martyr's strong defense of the faith
First video game about Jesus launches on Facebook
Vandals strike historic Santa Cruz church
EU accused of funding abortion with development money
Brent Dusing's advice to Internet Evangelists
Creator of Bible-based Facebook game lauds internet evangelism
Sacrifice of Titanic's Catholic priests recalled on 100th anniversary
Benedict XVI visits the Shrine of the Virgin of Cobre and meets President Raul Castro
Vestments for Pope's Mass in Cuba arrive with love from Peru
Pope Benedict XVI in Antonio Maceo Square in Santiago de Cuba
Benedict XVI meets with President Calderon and Mexican children
Americans speak up for religious freedom at nationwide rallies
Neighborhood rallies against plan to build strip club near convent
Pope's first Mexican address offers encouragement to faithful
Arrival of  Pope Benedict XVI  to Mexico
Pope offers his blessing to handicapped children in Mexico
Texas bishops hear call to unity at St. Peter's tomb
Interview with Br. Guy Consolmagno
Indiana Catholics respond to 'devastating' storm damage
May
25

Liturgical Calendar

May 25, 2012



All readings:
Today »
This year »

Catholic Daily

Gospel of the Day

Jn 21,15-19

Gospel
Date
05/25/12
05/24/12
05/23/12

Daily Readings


First Reading:: Acts 25:13b-21
Gospel:: Jn 21:15-19

Homily of the Day

Jn 21,15-19

Homily
Date
05/25/12
05/24/12
05/23/12
     HTML
Text only
Headlines
  

Follow us: