|
|
||||||||
|
Responding to Episcopalians, Archbishop of Canterbury proposes ‘two-track’ church
![]() Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams
Related articles:
.- Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, head cleric in the Church of England, has responded to the Episcopal Church’s decision to allow the ordination of homosexual bishops. Saying that a change in Anglican teaching, if necessary, would require broader agreement, he proposed a “two-track” church structure which recognizes “two ways of being Anglican.” On July 14, the Episcopal Church’s General Convention voted to approve homosexual bishops. It was seen as a rejection of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s and the Anglican Communion’s call for a moratorium on the practice. Writing in a July 27 document titled “Communion, Covenant and our Anglican Future,” Archbishop Williams said the wording of the resolution showed that it did not want to “cut its moorings from other parts of the Anglican family.” The two most controversial resolutions, he said, do not have the “automatic effect” of overturning the moratoria on homosexual clergy. However, he said the resolutions do not suggest the General Convention will “repair the broken bridges into the life of other Anglican provinces” and have led to the expression of “very serious anxieties.” He said the issue is not simply about civil liberties, human dignity, or the freedom of individual Christians to form their consciences. “It is about whether the Church is free to recognize same-sex unions by means of public blessings that are seen as being, at the very least, analogous to Christian marriage,” he said. Based on the Christian Church’s consistent reading of the Bible for two millennia, the archbishop said, an innovation would require “the most painstaking biblical exegesis” and “a wide acceptance of the results within the Communion.” “This is not our situation in the Communion,” he said, noting that persons living in homosexual unions cannot represent the Anglican Church without “serious incongruity.” He also counseled Anglicans to recall how a local church decides on a “sensitive and controversial matter” so as not to be “completely trapped in the particularly bitter and unpleasant atmosphere of the debate over sexuality, in which unexamined prejudice is still so much in evidence and accusations of bad faith and bigotry are so readily thrown around.” Noting past Christian errors, he also warned about the danger of a local church simply becoming “isolated and imprisoned in its own cultural environment.” He suggested the possibility of a “twofold ecclesial reality,” with a “covenanted” Anglican global body fully sharing a vision of how the Church should be. To this would be joined “in less formal ways” associated local churches in “various kinds of mutual partnership.” Rather than a “two-tier” system, he suggested, this is a “two-track model” with two ways of “witnessing to the Anglican heritage.” “The ideal is that both 'tracks' should be able to pursue what they believe God is calling them to be as Church, with greater integrity and consistency,” he continued. “It helps to be clear about these possible futures, however much we think them less than ideal, and to speak about them not in apocalyptic terms of schism and excommunication,” he said, stating that they are “two styles of being Anglican.” “All of this is to do with becoming the Church God wants us to be, for the better proclamation of the liberating gospel of Jesus Christ,” the Archbishop of Canterbury’s document concluded. He said the present situation should be seen not as “an unhappy sent of tensions” but rather “an opportunity for clarity, renewal and deeper relation with one another” and with God. The Archbishop of Canterbury’s conciliatory statement contrasts with the response of prominent biblical scholar and Anglican Bishop of Durham N.T. Wright, who said the Episcopal Church’s recent decision formalized a “schism” and marked a “clear break” with the Anglican Communion. Bishop Wright also criticized those Episcopalians who have “long embraced a theology in which chastity, as universally understood by the wider Christian tradition, has been optional.” Subscriber comments:
Published by: Michele Lear
Los Angeles, CA USA 08/09/2009 09:32 PM EST
I seem to recall Scripture saying something about a house divided against itself...
Published by: Fr Don Malin
Rocky Ford CO 08/03/2009 11:59 AM EST
It seems that when the ECUSA made this choice to embrace something that in the tradition is called sin, or an abomination, that they have embraced the god of that sin as their god for the sake of unity. I am deeply disturbed by this development and am inspired to pray for these misguided children of God who have "exchanged the glory of the creator for that of the creature"
Published by: Sr. Catherine Hagaba
Uganda 07/30/2009 01:03 AM EST
What is the theological and moral compass of the Anglican (church?/)? It is hard to imagine that a church can have two types of moralities and spirituality for the sake of staying together. One cannot help but ask what exactly is the message of salvation espoused by the Anglicans who share the Archbishop's position? what is his theological anthropology? I just wonder whether the future generation of people will be able to distinguish the true message of salvation preached by Christ from its adulteration!!
Published by: Bill James
Sacramento/CA/USA 07/29/2009 11:28 AM EST
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams speaks with a forked tongue. His "two ways of being Anglican" are the two prongs of that fork.
Published by: John
England 07/29/2009 11:01 AM EST
Sigh... The Church of England is such a politically correct, bureaucratic mess. I guess that's what happens when your Church is founded by a King who wanted a divorce.
Published by: Bob
Phila/PA/USA 07/29/2009 08:43 AM EST
It seems the good Archbishop Williams is trying to please "all the people all the time.", this will be at best, very difficult to do. The quote in the article “The ideal is that both 'tracks' should be able to pursue what they believe God is calling them to be as Church, with greater integrity and consistency.”, underlies the problem here and actually accentuates the 2000 year old beauty and truth of the teaching authority and magisterium of the Catholic Church. Archbishop Rowan it seems is letting the members of the Anglican Communion to decide what doctrines are true or false, to follow or not to follow. This is a slipperry slope recipe for disater. Episcopaleans......come home to the True Catholic Church.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ 06:01 am | DC ruling favors same-sex ‘marriage’ over religious freedom, archdiocese says Related news :
Former Episcopalians launch Anglican Church in North America Anglican bishop: Manner of Fr. Cutié’s conversion will harm Catholic-Episcopal relations New ‘orthodox Anglican’ diocese forms in western U.S. Traditional Anglican union with Catholics ‘unlikely,’ Vatican official argues Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

