|
|
||||||||
|
Sacramento public library system continues policy allowing porn viewing
![]() Alternate board member David Sander
Related articles:
.- The Sacramento Library Authority Board voted last Thursday to retain its policy of minimal interference with patrons who access pornography on library computers, News10 Sacramento reports. Board members also voted to spend $21,000 for more computer monitors with recessed screens to allow more private viewing. "Pornography does nothing to enrich. Pornography does nothing to empower. Pornography is tearing families apart," parent Kimberly Woods told board members. The library now has a “shoulder-tap” policy that allows patrons to object to what others might be watching. American Civil Liberties Union attorney Ann Brick argued even that policy was too restrictive. “Is there a problem here or do we have people who want to engage in censorship?” she asked. Brick claimed that there had been only 11 complaints about inappropriate material out of 500,000 hours of internet use. Board member Robbie Waters explained his support for $21,000 for more private computer screens, saying he wanted people to be able to exercise their right to be able to view whatever they would like. "It allows the screen to come right up at you and nobody can look over your shoulders," Waters said. "The board members that voted against morality, their big hang-up is they are trying to hide behind the First Amendment to the Constitution, saying that we don't have a right to censor anything," said Sacramento resident Darlene Ward. In a letter dated April 28 and provided to the California Catholic Daily, alternate Sacramento Library Board member David Sander said, “I am just stunned that this is even an issue that needs debating.” “Pornography does not belong in public libraries -- period. Libraries are places for kids and families to learn and explore -- not a den of sexual exploitation where anything goes,” he said. Sander said that he was most upset that, in his view, half the library board members agreed with the ACLU that the library ought to increase access to pornography at taxpayer expense. “What an outrage! As if there aren't already enough options for people to access pornography,” he said. According to Sander, the board would study the policies of other library districts that ban pornography. “With further demonstration that such bans both work and have not faced legal challenges, it's possible that we can gain one or more votes to follow suit and ban pornography in our Sacramento Public Libraries as well,” Sander said. According to News10, library board members said they do not expect the issue to come before them again in the foreseeable future. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Kell Brigan
Sacramento, CA 01/04/2010 02:58 PM EST
I live and work in Sacramento County, and the primary problem, "Sacramento Citizen" is that I REFUSE to help fund your questionable recreation activities. How can SPL expect anyone to take their cries for donations and volunteers (which are legion) seriously when they allow this blarney, and waste precious funds buying stuff like the "Penthouse Letters" series, etc. When I complained, the only response the Library had was that the porn was "popular" so they were happy about providing it. I'm sure publically funded food banks would be more popular, too, if they gave out free cystal meth, but that's no excuse for wasting MY TAXES on buying garbage for foolish or addicted people.
Published by: Sacramento Citizen
Sacramento, CA 05/03/2009 12:33 PM EST
I think the problem is with you sir. Have you been suffering from an addiction to porn?
What I ask, is in what way do you think you, or the ones arguing against porn, think it is your responsibility to worry about what others do with their time or with their lives. I like porn, I enjoy watching it, I get a kick out of it, and laugh at it. What people choose to do with their time is their business, so mind your own. If you don't like: go to another country where a constitution like ours is not followed. Thank you.
Published by: John Fedor
Yoncalla Or. U.S.A. 05/01/2008 01:40 AM EST
This library is no different than an "ADULT" book store,
except for the fact that the perverts are out in the open instead of in a closet behind a curtin. ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
City awards library worker fired for reporting child pornography viewer Mother takes on Wal-Mart over 7 year-old's exposure to Swimsuit Edition Library worker fired for reporting patron’s use of child pornography Former Archdiocese of Los Angeles official decries city’s pornography industry Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

