|
|
||||||||
|
Scholars call for gender ideology to be removed from public education in Puerto Rico
Related articles:
.- The president of the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, Marcelina Velez de Santiago, together with other academic scholars, is supporting a request from various organizations that the government revoke a memo that obliges public schools to include the controversial gender ideology in their curricula. Since it was issued last July, the memo has generated protests from numerous religious and civil groups. In a letter sent to the current governor and to the governor-elect, Velez de Santiago said the memo should be revoked for the good of Puerto Rican children and young people. She noted that “gender equality” is “not a term that is clearly defined” and is “strongly disputed, criticized and even rejected in the academic environments of America and Europe because of its anthropological, psychological, philosophical and theological implications. To aim to restructure all curricula in light of a disputable and elusive theory is to launch public schools into a chaotic and anarchic reform in which subjective opinions and arbitrary decisions will prevail,” she said. Likewise, Velez de Santiago warned that “by reducing the sexual difference to a social construct” gender equality goes against “the most elementary evidence of reason that has in reality, and not in theories, its proper object.” Education and social pressure, she said, “can mold different ways of being men and women, they never define being a man and a woman, which is data that is inscribed in nature and in human reality.” She went on to say that to introduce “this theory into public schools would only be justified if the sole purpose were to educate the young generation in the self-determination of their own sexual identity, independent of any objective data, opening the door to the acceptance of any form a affective relationships and sexual practice (homosexual, bisexual, transsexual).” Subscriber comments:
Published by: John Tobin
Mackay/Queensland/Australia. 01/09/2009 06:55 AM EST
Jesus loved every person regardless of their sins.
He also told them to "SIN NO MORE."
Published by: Kustomlady
USA 12/16/2008 03:17 PM EST
xrk9854,
"Show me where Jesus denounced..." "Haven't you read," he (Jesus) replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,'and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'? So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate." Matthew 19
Published by: xrk9854
USA 12/14/2008 03:16 PM EST
The Catholic Church never seems to learn. You can't stop progress. More than 500 years ago they put Galileo under house arrest for teaching the Copernican theory. It only took the Church 500 years to admit that mistake and apologize. In the same vein they are wrong about transsexualism. The Church needs to restrict it's activities to spiritual matters are it faces further loss of credibility. Show me where Jesus denounced ANYONE, let alone transsexual people. He preached love, forgiveness and tolerance. We need to get back to those essential principles and leave science to the scientists.
Published by: Kathleen
Philadelphia, PA USA 12/13/2008 09:24 AM EST
Ms. Velez de Santiago should of course realise that transsexuality is not a form of sexual practice or affective relationship. Sloppy work for an academic.
Her arguing against acceptance of people with a sexual identity or gender identity that doesn't meet her ideology leaves her with some responsiblity for the human suffering caused by the discrimination she not only accepts but fosters.It also leaves her no ground to stand upon when people discriminate against people based upon their religion not comporting with their religous beliefs or those whose who's religous beliefs forbid women in positions of authority or in authority over men. Should their belief that being a woman is a that is a status "inscribed in nature and in human reality" which precludes defining them as suitable for positions of authority be grounds for excluding policies on the equality of women in public school curricula? ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
01:06 am | Chinese Catholics to have ‘great celebration’ for Feast of St. Joseph 11:34 pm | Confirmation of lesbian as Episcopal bishop causes regret in Canterbury 10:02 pm | Objectors to required Spanish course take case to EU Court 09:47 pm | Health care bill could force people to pay for abortion, bishops’ spokeswoman says 08:35 pm | No bishops involved in cases of sex abuse in Brazil, Vatican spokesman clarifies Related news :
University officer fired for criticizing homosexual politics files lawsuit Gay activists disrupt Sunday service at Michigan church Prop. 8 supporters suffer harassment, assaults from homosexual activists Same-sex marriage will impact all families and children, video shows Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||
