|
|
||||||||
|
Secretary Clinton confirms U.S. thinks abortion access is ‘reproductive health’
![]() Rep. Chris Smith / Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Related articles:
.- During a House Foreign Affairs Committee Hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) questioned Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about whether the Obama administration is seeking to weaken or overturn pro-life laws and policies in other countries. Secretary Clinton responded to his questions, affirming that the U.S. government’s definition of reproductive health includes access to abortion. “Sanger’s prolific writings drip with contempt for those she considers to be unfit to live,” Rep. Smith said. Noting that he had read many of Sanger’s articles and books, Rep. Smith characterized Sanger as an “unapologetic eugenicist and racist” who said “the most merciful thing a family does for one of its infant members is to kill it” and also characterized eugenics as the “most adequate and thorough avenue” to solve “racial, political and social problems.” He quoted Sanger’s book “Pivot of Civilization” in which she decried charitable work as “not merely superficial and near-sighted” but also as concealing “a stupid cruelty” that leads to “the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents and dependents.” Rep. Smith said it was “extraordinarily difficult” to understand how a Secretary of State could be in “awe” of Sanger, saying she had openly professed views “antithetical to protecting human rights.” He also charged Planned Parenthood with killing over 305,000 children by abortion in the U.S. and “millions more” worldwide in 2007 alone. Pressing Secretary Clinton about the policies of the Obama administration, he asked whether the administration seeks to “weaken or overturn” pro-life laws and policies in African and Latin American countries either “directly” or by funding non-governmental organizations such as Planned Parenthood, or through “multilateral organizations” such as the U.N., African Union, or the Organization of American States. He also asked whether the United States’ definitions of the terms “reproductive health,” “reproductive services” or “reproductive rights” include abortion. Responding to Rep. Smith, Secretary Clinton avoided commenting on Margaret Sanger or her reception of the Margaret Sanger Award. She said she “deeply respected” Rep. Smith’s concerns and views, but said “we obviously have a profound disagreement.” Saying she had visited hospitals in Brazil where “half the women” were greeting new babies and the other half were “fighting for their lives against botched abortions,” she remarked that she had also been in African countries where “12 and 13 year old girls are bearing children.” She also claimed that the denial of “family planning” in Asian countries “consigns women to lives of oppression and hardship.” “We happen to think that family planning is an important part of women’s health. And reproductive health includes access to abortion that I believe should be safe, legal, and rare,” Secretary Clinton continued, claiming she has spent “a lot of my time” trying to bring down the rate of abortions. She argued that keeping women and men in “ignorance” and denying them access to “services” actually increases the rate of abortion. “We are now an Administration that will protect the rights of women, including their rights to reproductive health care,” she said. Commenting later on Wednesday about Clinton’s testimony, Rep. Smith said it shows the Obama Administration is plotting to conduct a foreign policy that spreads abortion all over the world at U.S. taxpayers’ expense. “It is evident that Mrs. Clinton and President Obama want to force the tragedy of abortion upon women around the world especially and including in countries where democratically elected leaders want to continue to protect their unborn children,” Smith said. “There are other ways in which both mother and baby are protected, cared for and helped— with food, nutrition, clean water and life-affirming healthcare,” he said. “Secretary Clinton’s inability to see this will mean more babies will die and more women will suffer the consequence of abortion as a result of U.S. foreign policy overseas.” Subscriber comments:
Published by: James Maher
Ireland 04/27/2009 11:04 AM EST
One of your correspondents says "there's nothing worse than a child born unwanted and without a future". Wrong - there is. Killing it is worse!
Long live Rep Smith. He is living Bishop Chaput's exhortation that "We should stand up and be counted!"
Published by: Brendan Bradley
Ireland 04/24/2009 06:01 AM EST
Where do we get the idea that abortion is a mark of human progress and not a regression into barbarism? It cannot be that taking a wholly innocent life is the answer to the terrible suffering endured by women in some poor countries. The answer instead is to direct funding towards better medical facilities dedicated to the preservation of human life from conception to the grave. Why should the innocent unborn be treated like an aggressor or enemy? It has done nothing to promote the moral and social poverty of this world, so why put it to death? Liberals would recoil at the thought of putting rapists to death but think nothing of killing off the unborn child who can neither defend nor speak for itself. Something is shockingly wrong when public voices are raised more against the mistreatment of animals than against the unborn human being. In an appalling incident here in N. Ireland some thugs mutilated a dog and threw its remains into a ditch. A public outcry rightly followed with full media coverage. But is there a similar furore when millions of unborn babies are discarded as so much detritus? Not on your sweet life! Alas for the unborn child - any indignity will do in the name of this brave new world of ‘enlightened’ eugenics.
Published by: Ivan Erickson
Renton, WA USA 04/23/2009 06:44 PM EST
All of those poor souls, such as Margaret Sanger and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, of whom propagate those sinful abominations of which are diametrically opposed to God's commandments, mandates, laws, decrees and jurisdiction, are not only accruing the debt of sin for their own transgressions, but are also accruing the debt of sin for all those for whom they are leading astray from the Truth and the Light of God via their words, written text, documents, or being involved in any manner in the voting for or the enactment of laws that go contrary to God's Will! God added no addenda to the commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Kill"! Mankind must not do so either!
God in His wisdom has placed a hymen in the body of all women as a symbol, as well as a seal to the blessed chamber in which the miracle of all human life is conceived and perpetuated by Him. Those that lack wisdom and understanding do not perceive this Truth, to their downfall. Women such as Sanger and Clinton are also the epitomy of what the Apostle Paul stated when he said, in effect, that when in church women should keep their heads covered and their hands over their mouths! Ivan Erickson Author of "Song of the Storm Winds".
Published by: d.smith
california 04/23/2009 06:19 PM EST
Dear Hillary,
God is PRO-LIFE!. But then we know you believe your opinion is greater than your Creator's. You are a part of this pathetic Culture of Death which is overwhelming the nation's conscience. Your intelligence came from God - please use it. You are so much in favor of infanticide, genocide and other aspects of death, God help us if the government ever is in charge of our health care! History has shown us what would happen to the infirm, the sick, the soon to be born!
Published by: Mark
Powhatan VA 04/23/2009 05:25 PM EST
the Princess of Planned Parenhood stakes out a little more territory for the culture of death. Surely this surprises nobody--she's worn this on her sleeve for decades.
Published by: Joseph Wagner
Sarasota Florida 04/23/2009 04:11 PM EST
Hi
As of this minute, I am totally against Hillery Clinton as Sec. of state and also would like to see President Obama replaces. They both promote killing of the innocent babies. joseph Wagner
Published by: G. LATO
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA 04/23/2009 03:49 PM EST
No, Sara Cohen, you have it all wrong! We are all here because our mothers did not abort us whilst still working and contributing to the communities they lived in. A woman does not have to kill her unborn child in order to prove how useful she can be to the community!
My mother, God bless her, had the guts and love to carry me through the darkest days of WWII when bombs came down every day and food was scarce, AND she still went on to contribute to the community. It his her love and that of my father that I treasure most to this day and which I endevour to pass on to my children.
Published by: normajean oberst
timonium, maryland 04/23/2009 01:13 PM EST
we all were created by love itself who is a Person. the depths of this love are deep and unfathomable. we are made in God's image. when we destroy God's image thru abortion we are commiting a crime against not only ourselves but God himself.we are rejecting love itself. choosing love is choosing life! they are inseperable. will be praying for all who read these responses. love to all on both sides of this fundamental issue.
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe/NM/US 04/23/2009 12:59 PM EST
Sorry Mr. Bentley but the worse thing that can happen to a child is to be murdered by their 'host' before they even get a chance to live. Even if you Mr. Bentley are having a bad life would you have wished you had never been born?
Published by: Ben
Michigan, USA 04/23/2009 12:25 PM EST
This is a concerning article. The reverse should happen where we spend money to council countries in ways to avoid abortions. Primarily, the Church needs to step up and be pro-life in a loving and acceptable manner.
The problem with abortion is that the "when does life start" question only holds up for a short time. Once it is undeniable that life starts at conception the next question is when does that life become viable. If we start pursuing that question, we'll make the Sangers in the world smile. The only answer to that questions is eugenics because there are many out of the womb that are "not viable." God change the hearts of this Administration. ~Ben
Published by: Beatrice Stroupe
Indian Land, SC USA 04/23/2009 12:14 PM EST
Would anyone expect anything different from the likes of Hilary Clinton?
Published by: Ed Woods
Greenwood, IN 46142 04/23/2009 12:10 PM EST
We're in a very sick country & world. When an administration professes the igorance of when when life begins, then what else can we expect. Pray and pray hard.
Published by: anne
new york 04/23/2009 11:25 AM EST
wow, how ignorant.
Published by: Bucky
CT- USA 04/23/2009 10:53 AM EST
The right to have an abortion should alwas exist, but no abortion should be performed without consent or at the expense of others. If you want an abortion then you pay for it and any 'conditions' occurring from it, physical or psychological.
Published by: Allan Overcast
Billings, MT, USA 04/23/2009 08:40 AM EST
...yet, how many of us cast a vote for the Obama administration in the election? Are we suprised at his support of the killing of innocent children? We should have remembered the childhood story of the fox in sheeps clothing. May God forgive this nation for what it has done.
Published by: dAVID LARSEN
scituate Mass. USA 04/23/2009 07:26 AM EST
I would doubt that any public figure would deliberately promote abortion. It is their ignorance that promotes this tragedy because these public figures have a futile sense of how to educate those they would serve,so that they would make their own safe choices. Simply they don't have confidence in their own ability to govern in these matters. Having an abortion is risky behavior,oppression and a hardship. Chastity is an enlightened approach as is teaching that sex is sacred to be reserved for raising a family. Conventional marriage is another enlightened choice. Homosexual encounters encourage disease and is a poor choice. I believe that Ms. Clinton may actually believe this reasonably but would never have the guts to say it. This is because it falls into the ignorant realm of "political correctness". It is not part of the democratic party platform. This purer view is not an agenda on which they would ever campaign for. Sexual purity is a hot button issue and today is too unpopular. It is however the road to take so as to make happy and enlightened choices that promote a healthy sexual outcome and good marriages.
Published by: bob
West Chester, PA 04/23/2009 06:50 AM EST
God bless Chris Smith. Every Catholic should support his efforts.
Published by: Les
Detroit, MI USA 04/22/2009 08:15 PM EST
We are at a point where we must realize that we live in a pagan society. Believers are foreign here. And as such we have to educate, correct and admonish those among us--even those above us in worldly rank--that civilization is maintained and protected by Christianity. We live with people who kill their own unborn... without any qualms or trouble of conscience! Sure these are our brothers and sisters, these abortionists (and that is what we must call them--not just the doctors, but the people who condone it). And we should try not to be rude or insulting to them, these abortionists. But we must point out to them their complete ignorance on the topic of what it means to be a human. At the same time we must tell the common man--the people who follow their leaders based on how the leader looks, or dresses, or pronounces his or her vocabulary--tell them all what abortion is. Show them. Ask them if they themselves can describe it. Ask them if they've ever seen an aborted fetal human. Ask why it "should be rare." Point out that what abortionists really mean is that they want to rarely speak about it. When we do this--and when enough post-abortive mothers realize what our society has robbed them of--then our prayers will be answered and the killing will end.
Published by: Sharon Tiglao
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA USA 04/22/2009 06:40 PM EST
Secretary Clinton is only able to see her own progress in politics and will take any stand that will assure the power she wants in her bid for the highest office in our land,that includes pleasing the current administration on abortion. I trust that the praying power of the Christian majority will turn this situation around. To Rep. Smith and all with true faith-we are with you behind the scenes and at Christian health clinics for young women everywhere. I was at St. Ann's myself years ago when I needed help.
Sharon
Published by: dm
san diego, ca 04/22/2009 06:24 PM EST
The catholics would have us believe that Brazil is "perfect" model for its vision of the world. Child rape unpunished, alley abortions, 9 yolds dying in child birth with twins. Its a proundly ignorant and dark future the churxh has for us.
Published by: David
Durham, NC 04/22/2009 06:06 PM EST
Secretary Clinton should be asked specifically if she holds Sanger's dysgenic beliefs that recommend sterilizing or limiting the reproduction of the poor, minorities, mentally ill, and convicted criminals and eugenic beliefs encouraging affluent whites to have more children. While modern pro-choice feminists like Clinton generally reject Sanger's eugenic/dysgenic positions, they push for free and freely available contraceptives, interceptives, and abortions that have the same effects. A sad irony.
Published by: Sara Cohen
Dahlonega, GA, USA 04/22/2009 05:51 PM EST
.It is a shame that Rep Smith chooses to pick what sections of understanding he has on abortion. As an active fighter for the rights of children to be safe, healthy and above all, wanted, I refute his statements about what abortion does. Abortion allows women to be free of the domination by reporduction from man. It allows women to plan for wanted children whom they can care for but also allows them to plan for those children already born. IT allows communities to learn that women can contribute to a community by the work they do not by the children they produce. As education of women around the world increases, women have fewer children, not because they abort them, but because they have learned how not to have them if they do not want or cannot care for them. Abortion is the last end of poor reporductive planning, not the beginning result.
Shame on you Rep Smith
Published by: Nigel Allen
Sydney, NSW, Australia 04/22/2009 05:50 PM EST
Thankfully, the USA now has an administration that will defend everyone's rights - regardless of gender or belief system. To deny access to sex education and birth control in third world countries ensures that they will remain third world countries in the thrall of religion. Rep Smith should be thankful that he and his family live in such fortunate circumstances.
Published by: Steve Holle
Billings MT USA 04/22/2009 05:48 PM EST
Thank you for publisizing the Sanger portion of the questioning. I've looked at a number of other news sources and NONE of the mention the facts in this article.
Published by: KNC
Boston, MA 04/22/2009 05:48 PM EST
we should be afraid of our government trying to force democracy and christianity on other countries, not abortion
Published by: Ann Penn
USA 04/22/2009 05:45 PM EST
As someone who nearly died from a wanted, planned pregnancy at a time when abortion was mostly illegal in the US, I appreciate access as a matter of health. Because I was finally able to have that pregnancy terminated surgically I now have adult children who are contributing to society and have had many more years with my husband.
It has made me think twice about judging others motives and health decisions, both mental and physical.
Published by: Michael Tocc
Scottsville, VA 24590 04/22/2009 05:45 PM EST
Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler subscribed to the same Darwinist - racist - genocidal philosophy of the sterilization and ultimate elimination of all inferior races. Anyone with any moral conscience would not only be "awed" by Margaret Sanger's life and teachings, but should be "shocked" as well.
Published by: BruceR
milwaukee/wi/usa 04/22/2009 05:41 PM EST
Sanger, and Clinton, are correct. Sanger recognized that humans have, by standing on the top of the food chain, removed ourselves from the natural selection process. Without evolution we will devolve. To progress the species we must self-select, thus eugenics. Also, war. And self evaluation. We keep the three defective embryos we produced (before we had ourselves sterilized) in little bottles on the what-not shelf. That satisfies our parenting instincts.
It should, of course, be up to each society to decide what to select for. One thing all societies should select against is the mutation that leads to illogical thinking or the need for an invisible man in the sky. That's just creepy.
Published by: Cactass Dupree
PBG FL. U.S.A. 04/22/2009 05:38 PM EST
When will they learn that it is a HUMAN BEING???
Published by: Dave
Houston/TX/USA 04/22/2009 05:37 PM EST
I think it's embarrassing that as a nation, as a world, we still argue about this kind of thing. Show me a world without social and physical rape, and perhaps then that world will not require the barbarism of abortion. However, until then, for those that wish to continue arguing over a 30-year-old Federal law, perhaps you can choose to adopt each and every child that would otherwise be aborted. Hang out at the clinics and make your offers. Otherwise, kindly.. give it a rest and focus on what's important.
Published by: Richard Bentley
Tucson, AZ USA 04/22/2009 05:35 PM EST
Representative Smith is using hyperbole to characterize Margaret Sanger's writings. This is typical of a fundamentalist who has an axe to grind and doesn't care where he uses it. The worst thing that can happen to a child is to be born unwanted and without a future.
Published by: David
California, USA 04/22/2009 05:32 PM EST
Hilary obviously didn't do her homework when she accepted the award. Although she brought up some valid points about Brazil and Africa, the solution is not abortion. The solution is to prevent the pregnancy. Many times politicians try to solve issues by providing new things (in this case abortion), but the real solution is to determine why the problem is even a problem.
I personally have lived in Brazil and I understand why hospitals have their problems. Rather than kill the innocent, let's fight the problem at the source of the problem. We can save lives by changing lifestyles.
Published by: xanti
LV/ NV/ USA 04/22/2009 05:32 PM EST
The liberals scream about interrogating terrorist during times of war, but will kill babies in an instant.
Published by: SpudM
Houston, TX, USA 04/22/2009 05:31 PM EST
When Mr. Smith's life is threatened by an unplanned pregnancy forced on him by a rapist, I'll listen to him. Until then, I'll listen to his daughter.
Published by: TBrady
Utah 04/22/2009 05:30 PM EST
Ahhh yes, more evidence of the lefts/democrates acceptance of murder and forcing us to accept reduced morals (as with the comments made against Miss California)
Published by: Hexxa
Denver, CO 04/22/2009 05:26 PM EST
Thank God for Hillary Clinton and the other people out there defending a woman's right to be in charge of herself and not simply an agent of reproduction. I will continue to pray for abortion to be unneccessary but available.
Published by: Salvatore Lenzi
Belleville NJ, USa 04/22/2009 05:26 PM EST
First we help the immigrants. Now we are going to help people in other countries. When are OUR TAXES going to help US AMERICANS. Let Hilary use her money to help the foreigners
Published by: FW
Ypsilanti, MI, USA 04/22/2009 05:22 PM EST
Thank you for posting this information and getting the word out. God bless you.
Published by: Comanche1
Texas 04/22/2009 05:22 PM EST
Shows how totally inappropriately the Right wing inserts their social agenda in distant policy decisions aided and abetted by the Vatican. Can we bring up sex abuse of children on the part of Catholic practitioners and priests? That has more to do with foreign policy than Abortion. Oh by the way, you lost the elections. Try to act adult now. Jesus is insulted by your hypocrisy!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
06:34 pm | Post office rate hike on mailings critical of homosexuals in the military overruled 09:41 pm | U.S. Bishops’ final plea to Congressmen: Do not pass pro-abortion health care bill 08:44 pm | Louisiana bishops: Denials that Senate health care bill funds abortion are mistaken 06:43 pm | Chinese Church officials to attend third straight plenary meeting in Vatican 03:09 pm | Iraqi Christian gunned down in Mosul Related news :
Senate Finance Committee recommends confirmation of Gov. Sebelius Abortionist's letter contradicts Sebelius' campaign contribution statement Law Center challenges basis of DHS report on right-wing extremist threat Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

