Thousands rally against Conn. bill that ‘directly attacks’ Catholic Church
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Catholics protesting in Hartford

.- Thousands of Connecticut Catholics rallied at the state capitol on Wednesday to protest a proposed state law which would have reorganized the financial and pastoral structure of the Catholic Church.

Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport had warned that the bill “directly attacks the structure of the Roman Catholic Church.” The bill itself requires that parish pastors report to the board of directors about all “administrative and financial matters.” The archbishop or bishop would serve as an “ex-officio” member and would lose his voting rights.

Bishop Lori argued the bill, S.B. 1098, would remove any real relationship between the parish and the bishop and would turn pastors into “figureheads.”

S.B. 1098 was pulled on Tuesday, following protests from Catholics and others who saw it as a clearly unconstitutional proposal.

Despite their apparent victory, the Catholic rally went forward at the capitol’s north steps at noon today.

Footage from local news coverage showed protesters waving printed signs reading “Religious Freedom” while others carried homemade posters.

One such poster read “My faithful voice says: stop dividing my Church!” Another said “We the People, not the politicians – In God we trust, not the Politicians – Protect our God-given rights,” while a third read “Connecticut legislators, please STOP harassing the Catholic Church.”

Many protesters had been bused in from area parishes.

Filomena Moura from Monroe, Connecticut told WFSB she was there “to tell our representatives that we are for the freedom of religion and the separation of religion and state.”

Speakers at the rally included Bishop Lori, Archbishop of Hartford Henry Mansell, Bishop of Norwich Michael Cote and Supreme Knight of Columbus Carl Anderson.

Anderson characterized the proposal as an attack on the Catholic Church which would “turn back the clock 150 years,” referring to anti-Catholic legislation instated by the Know Nothing movement.

The bill would also have a chilling effect on the freedom of religion and the freedom of speech, he argued.

Some estimates put the crowd at around 4,000 people, while a reporter with HeadlineBistro.com estimated two to three thousand were present.

According to HeadlineBistro.com, Bishop Lori called on the sponsoring legislators to apologize to the people of Connecticut. He told the crowd that even a first year law student would know better than to propose S.B. 1098.

Archbishop Mansell said the proposed law has embarrassed the state and the legislators, arguing that it makes no sense for a state with a $1 billion deficit to tell the Church how to run its finances.

According to HeadlineBistro, the crowd at times began spontaneous performances of “God Bless America” and at other times directed their ire towards legislators, chanting “Throw them out!” and “We vote!”

The day before the rally, State Senator L. Scott Frantz of Greenwich spoke against the bill. He called it an “unconstitutional attack on the intrinsic separation of church and state… to see that freedom so blatantly diluted by this legislation is something I will oppose every step of the way.”

“The bill should never have made it to the point of a public hearing,” he said, noting that the entire Senate Republican Caucus opposes the bill.

According to a statement from Sen. Frantz’s office, the bill would also allow any person who suspected money donated to the Church has been used for purposes other than those the donor intended to report the claim to the state Attorney General, who must then investigate and take necessary action.

The controversial legislation had been introduced last week by the chairs of the Judiciary Committee of the Connecticut State Legislature, Senator Andrew McDonald of Stamford and Representative Michael Lawlor of East Haven.

Both lawmakers are prominent homosexuals who have been vociferous advocates of same-sex marriage in Connecticut and have spoken out against the Catholic Church’s opposition to both civil unions and same-sex marriage.

The lawmakers said they had introduced the legislation at the request of two constituents, who on Tuesday requested the legislation be withdrawn.

 “It is clear to me that my attempt to create a forum for a group of concerned Catholic constituents to discuss their legislative proposals regarding parish corporate finances has offended a group of similarly devout Catholic parishioners,” McDonald said in a Wednesday statement, saying he intended no offense.

Julie Winkel, Director of Media Relations at the University of New Haven, informed CNA in an e-mail that a university accounting faculty member named Mary J. Miller, has consulted with the Diocese of Bridgeport in 2007 and 2008 to standardize parish accounting systems and to design new parish internal controls, policies and procedures.

“[Miller] notes that the systems put in place at the Diocese of Bridgeport have actually became a national model to other Catholic Dioceses as well as non-Catholic denominations, making additional oversight and this bill unnecessary,” Winkel told CNA. “She is currently working with Archdioceses of Chicago and Boston and the Diocese of Dallas to implement the standard Parish accounting systems of the ‘Bridgeport Plan’.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: gloria wilson
Chicago Il, USA 07/11/2009 11:10 AM EST
I put a disclaimer on all files and "phony catholic bibles you people have accumulated via Pro. Josehph Rathnau, Hillary Clinton, Bushes and the Obamas. I didn't go to school to pay your bills. He heard me the first time when I said no. I don't beleve in Nashville, Tennessee. I put a disclaimer at the labor board on those stolen cars. They should have stolen an criminal justice degree anyway, not an educational degree.
Published by: Ron Pichlik
Battle Creek, MI USA 03/13/2009 03:48 PM EST
To David in Irvine: Obviously you are unable to grasp hyperbole. But, since you bring it up. Your view that the Church is bereft of love and mercy is sorely mistaken. The Church, established by Christ, will never be missing these graces. But being loving and merciful DOES NOT mean confirming those who are living and/or engaged in serious sin in their serious sin. The Church and its' members have an obligation to bring our brothers' sin before them. If they do not wish to change their ways than they are indeed lost; because they are affirmatively rejecting the teaching of the Church as well as rejecting the opportunity to repent. Lastly, you need to be mindful of the fact of actually who fired the first volley; the openly gay members of Conn. congress sought to unconstitutionally impose themselves into the interior operations of the Church. I am merely pointing out that if these two "gentlemen" find freedom of speech, freedom of religion and our Constitution repugnant than perhaps they, and others of the same mindset should consider not seeking or holding public office. My suggestion was clearly hyperbole; it would be far better if voters sent people like this, with these ideas, back home since they obviously do not know the basic fundamentals about our political system.
Published by: Terri Flament
Waukegan, IL, United States 03/12/2009 07:05 PM EST
“And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18).
Published by: David
Irvine, CA, USA 03/12/2009 04:36 PM EST
Prohibit gay people from seeking or holding public office? Christ's love and mercy have long since left the Catholic faith. I see nothing here but hatred and bigotry.
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe/NM/US 03/12/2009 03:04 PM EST
McDonald seems like as much a 'devote Catholic' as Pelosi is---are these politican's reading from satan's playbook that in the end times he will enter The Church? Let's hope the Bishop shows these 'well meaning' politicans the door before they intentionally destroy The Catholic Church. Spitzer tried a similar tactic against pregnancy crisis centers in NY when he was attorney general.
Published by: Dale Howell
Sacramento CA 03/12/2009 11:55 AM EST
Now we know the truth. This bill was apparently an attempt by radical homosexuals to silence and destroy the Church, because the Church calls them to account for their immorality.

This is a stark reminder that we are in the world, but not of the world. Jesus told us that if the world hates us, it hated Him first. It did, and still does.

The Church, the Body of Christ, has real enemies who, when they have attained power, will attempt to use that power to harass and destroy the Church. The fact that they will not succeed has never stopped them from trying.

Let this be a wake-up call to all those Catholics who pride themselves on their false "tolerance," even to the point of supporting for political office those who advocate wickedness and immorality. Such is not tolerance, but supporting evil.

When your enemies have deceived you into helping them attain positions of authority, they will turn on you and do their best to destroy you.

As St. John wrote, "Love of the world is enmity against God."

Moses put it another way: "Choose this day whom you will serve.
Published by: maryann
Michigan/USA 03/12/2009 11:40 AM EST
I see the introduction of this bill as a good thing. It is a challenge to Catholics and all people of faith in America. Finally, it is being demanded of us to make a choice; to whom do we owe our allegience, God or the state. In addition, to what do we owe our "sacred honor", as so eloquently expressed by the authors of our founding documents, our Constitution or the whims of politicians of the day. I was heart-broken at seeing the need for protests calling for religious freedom in America. I was so very proud to see Catholics standing up and demanding it.
Published by: Angela Haissig
Waipahu, Hawaii 03/11/2009 11:18 PM EST
How refreshing to read quality writing and objective reporting! I only wish we had such a thing in Hawaii - not in this lifetime I'm afraid.
Published by: Ron Pichlik
Battle Creek, MI USA 03/11/2009 10:57 PM EST
It is gratifying to see how quickly the Catholic community galvanized over this to kill it. HOWEVER, it is still outrageous that anyone would have had the backbone to even publicly suggest this, let alone propose legislation to enforce it. Frankly, it makes one wonder, if homosexuals cannot tolerate freedom of speech and freedom of religion, perhaps legislation should be introduced that would prohibit homosexuals from seeking and/or holding elected office.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa