USCCB did not join FCC petition on hate speech, spokeswoman says
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Rush Limbaugh / Chairman Julius Genachowski

.- The Department of Communications of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has said it did not join a petition to the FCC which called for discussion over “hate speech” and its alleged role in violence. Some critics of the petition have cast it as an effort to shut down radio show hosts like Rush Limbaugh.

The Department of Communications told CNA on Monday that they had sent their own letter noting the “serious constitutional and regulatory problems” associated with regulating alleged hate speech.

The So We Might See Coalition, of which the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Department of Communications is a member, had organized a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski. The letter and its related petition asked the FCC to open a “notice of inquiry into hate speech in the media” and to update a 1993 report on the role of telecommunications in hate crimes.

The coalition said it is concerned about the possible connection between “hate speech” and violent crimes. It commented that immigrant, minority and religious segments of the population are often targeted by hate speech before being targeted by physical hate crimes.

The letter noted a June 2006 incident in which four teenagers posed as federal agents and asked two Mexican men for their green cards. The teens then beat and robbed the two men, accusing them of stealing jobs from U.S. citizens.

The coalition letter then noted that the incident occurred after radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh called Mexican immigrants a “renegade, potential crime element that is unwilling to work.” The letter did not indicate any connections between the teens and Limbaugh.

It warned that hate crimes against Hispanics have been increasing, claiming that electronic media have a strong influence on children and teenagers because they are not yet fully developed cognitively.

In a Monday e-mail to CNA, Secretary Helen Osman of the USCCB’s Department of Communications said that although the USCCB is one of the groups in the So We Might See coalition, the USCCB did not join the petition.

“USCCB shares So We Might See's general commitments to improving access to broadband among the under-served; to reducing violence in all media; and to reducing the excess of advertising in children's programming. But USCCB does not join in every action of the group, as in the case of this petition.

“In any event, we are certainly not participating in any campaign to censor any news organization, program or commentator,” she added.

Osman provided CNA with the USCCB’s own letter to the FCC to open an inquiry into hate speech. Such a notice does not result in any new regulations or action by the FCC, she pointed out.

“One reason we are eager to see the inquiry opened is that it will present an occasion to alert the FCC to the serious constitutional and regulatory problems associated with regulating hate speech,” Osman explained.

The USCCB’s July 29 letter to the FCC, signed by Osman, noted the “difficult constitutional and regulatory questions” raised by potential action against hate speech.

In the USCCB’s view, a forum opened by an FCC Notice of Inquiry would help discuss questions such as:

“Depending on the definition of hate speech, would expressions of religious teachings be deemed hate speech? For example, would Roman Catholic teachings on marriage or homosexuality be deemed hate speech by some gay rights advocates? Similarly, some religions may deem the religious beliefs of others to be hateful, but when, if ever, should that characterization bear legal significance?”

The USCCB expressed support for “a broad public forum” in which to debate such issues in “a respectful manner.”

The So We Might See National Interfaith Coalition for Media Justice includes the USCCB’s Department of Communications, the United Church of Christ’s Office of Communication, Inc., the National Council of Churches, the Islamic Society of North America, Presbyterian News Service, and the Communications Services of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: WOODY GUIDRY
VICTORIA, TX, USA 10/28/2009 05:51 PM EST
In response to a letter requesting that USCCB not be a part of the "hate speech" petition, the commerce secretary sent me a copy of a letter that had been sent to them from USCCB which specifies that the group's concern was that doctrinal sermons might be perceived as hate speech. The claim is that the insterest of USCCB lies only in that aspect. A lot of us were disappointed in 2008 when looking for some spine in well-publicised cases, but I think things are looking up in view of the Holy Father's recent appointments.
Published by: Christy
Duncanville, TX, USA 10/27/2009 09:04 PM EST
And for the record and in context, Rush's comment was specifically about people the Mexican government would be glad to see leave so it would not have to reform its own system, people who would put pressure on unjust government officials and policies. I noticed the UCC's treatment of Rush fits their own definition of "hate speech."
Published by: Kevin Taglang
Evanston, IL, USA 10/27/2009 01:33 PM EST
Is the message here that Catholic Bishops are against hate speech, but they oppose the government using the legal tools at its disposal to prevent it?
Published by: Lisa
Sidney, IL 10/27/2009 11:58 AM EST
It's time to disband the USCCB. This organization is getting out of control. They seem to be more interested in playing politics than in anything else...and by the way, exactly why is this group necessary? We already have a Magisterium. I also agree with Francis; I don't believe a word these people say. They have no credibility and seem to be completely out of touch with reality. Faithful Catholics can't depend on them for truth. You can't even get a good movie review out of them. In their views on Limbaugh, they seem to be pushing censorship of the press and governmental tyranny through the FCC. I think they are less concerned with hatred than they are with people who have different political opinions than their own. I don't want to have anything to do with that.
Published by: Francis
Wareham Ma 10/26/2009 08:14 PM EST
"The So We Might See National Interfaith Coalition for Media Justice includes the USCCB’s Department of Communications, the United Church of Christ’s Office of Communication, Inc., the National Council of Churches, the Islamic Society of North America, Presbyterian News Service, and the Communications Services of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America." Why is the USCCB involved with this "Coalition" in the first place?? Frankly, with the USCCBs' past and recent record on issues like congratulating Obama on winning the nobel peace prize, calling prosthelytizing the protestant sects "sheep stealing", caving in to the Jews about salvation, etc, etc, etc, I don't believe a word that they say! Sadly, the majority of the USCCB leans to the left not only on Catholic dogma but politically also. Therefore it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they DID participate in this "hate speech" petition; and are now trying to cover their you know whats!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa