U.S. bishops’ official: Stem cell guidelines ignore science and embryonic humanity
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Msgr. David Malloy, General Secretary of the USCCB

.- The U.S. bishops’ conference has submitted comment concerning the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on embryonic stem cell research, saying the rules ignore science, ethics and the humanity of the embryo.

Msgr. David Malloy, General Secretary of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), authored the comments. He said the proposed guidelines miss an “enormous opportunity” to combine science and “responsible ethics.” He declared it a “central fact of science” that the embryo is a human being “at a very early stage of his or her development.” Federal advisory groups had acknowledged this fact, Msgr. Malloy said, citing the National Bioethics Advisory Commission appointed by President Clinton.

The monsignor insisted it was a human right not to be subjected to harmful experimentation and said laws which do not protect that right are of questionable moral legitimacy.

Noting alternative methods of stem cell research such as induced pluripotent stem cells, he decried President Obama’s executive order which lifted funding restrictions on embryonic stem cell research.

According to Msgr. Malloy, the order also lifted requirements that NIH “thoroughly explore new avenues for obtaining pluripotent stem cells without destroying human embryos.”

“Both science and ethics have been ignored in this decision,” he charged.

“Avenues of stem cell research which pose no moral problem are now showing great promise. In fact, human patients suffering from all the conditions cited by President Obama when he signed his executive order – cancer, juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury, heart disease – have been shown in peer-reviewed studies to benefit from clinical trials using human stem cells,” he continued.

“And in every case, the benefit has come not from embryonic stem cells, but from the adult and cord blood stem cells that this organization and others have said should receive priority attention.”

Msgr. Malloy said the guidelines do not seek to fund research in which embryos are created for the purpose of research, but he said they were “broader or more permissive” than any previous research policy in key respects.

“As the President noted,” he said, “we must not make ‘a false choice between sound science and moral values.’ In fact, these sources of guidance both point in the same direction, away from destructive embryonic stem cell research. His executive order and these Guidelines nonetheless insist on a course of action that is both morally objectionable and, increasingly, scientifically obsolete.”

“This is not merely a political or ideological problem, or a problem of religious dogma, but a deeply human problem: We are testing the limits of our obligation to treat all fellow human beings, of every age and condition, with basic respect,” Msgr. Malloy said.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Teresa N
Acampo/CA/USA 07/11/2009 08:02 AM EST
Thank you, Msgr. Malloy, for speaking in defense of those who are not yet able---the unborn.
Published by: Marilyn
USA 05/26/2009 08:23 PM EST
C. Morris writes desparagingly of the Catholic Church. A deeper, more intellectual study of Chruch history will reveal that Doctrines develop along with increased knowledge and understanding of science and the world around us. Our dogmas are not altered. A discipline can be altered. A dogma is a belief; a discipline is a loving course to guide a soul to salvation. Read more commentaries on why Thomas Aquinas, writing in the 13th century, could not definitively say when a soul was infused into a body. This is not the same as saying when LIFE begins. Obviously, LIFE begins when the egg and sperm unite. This is Science 101.
It's a mystery to us why babies are sometimes lost before birth. It's not God's 'fault' - it could be the health of the mother, or something she has unwittingly done, etc. God doesn't 'cause' evil; he permits it for a greater good to come about. God's ways are not our ways.
We ask you, C. Morris, to be more charitable in your outlook. We love you, even if you don't understand us. Peace.
Published by: Ingrid Hansen
Detroit MI USA 05/26/2009 07:26 PM EST
C. Morris,
I don't know where you are getting your info on the Catholic Church. First of all: no dogmas were ever altered. Prove it if you can. Second, it never claimed that a woman did not have a soul. I don't know where you are coming from. You don't have to believe what we believe, but at least be truthful in your facts.
Alles gute,
Ingrid
Published by: Jill Pontius
Acton MA USA 05/26/2009 03:27 PM EST
"the embryo is a human being 'at a very early stage of his or her development.'" Is this development stage to human being measured in hours, days, weeks?
Published by: Andy
USA 05/26/2009 03:15 PM EST
C. Morris, you could ask that same question anytime any human being dies. Why doesn't God make it impossible for people to die in car wrecks? Or, what if the baby dies because of complications two weeks before the due date, does that some how mean it wasn't human?

To your second point, I'm not faimiliar with the Church's previous stance on this issue, but I would think you would applaud a decision made based on sound scientific fact. That's a major point of this article, science and ethics need to work together. If biology, as it does, tells that human life is created at conception and ethics tells us that destroying human life is a bad thing, wouldn't we then want to prevent the destruction of human embryos?
Published by: C. Morris
Germany 05/26/2009 05:46 AM EST
If a just fertilized human egg is a person. Why didn`t god make it impossible for it not to fail to achieve nidation successfully? An estimated 25-30 % of these are rejected by the lining of the womb and are voided in the bathroom. What happens to all those lost souls that god is said to implant at fertilization? The catholic church has changed its stance on when (for girls it was once a big "IF") a fetus receives a soul.
A look at the historical beliefs (dogmas) of this church will reveal how often they had to altered or abandoned (despite the church`s "hotline" to the almighty.
This institution never ceases in its attempts to pull the wool over people`s eyes . including indoctrination from babyhood on.
Published by: veronica
canada 05/26/2009 02:27 AM EST
why would a person of sound mind ignore both
science and ethics?
why?
Published by: Robert Matzinger
Taylor/Michigan/USA 05/25/2009 08:47 PM EST
This is just a continuation of federal policy set in motion by the world's foremost abortionist, President Obama! What will he propose next? Firts he supports the taking of life, then supports the manipulation of life. As Catholics who believe in the sanctity of life, we must stand togther and vigorously oppose Obama's plan for his "new" nationwide plan of acceptable forms of life and death!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa