|
|
||||||||
|
Same-sex
New Hampshire law marginalizes supporters of traditional marriage, bishop says
![]() Gov. John Lynch / Bishop John McCormack
Related articles:
.- New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch on Wednesday afternoon signed a bill to legalize same-sex “marriage” in the state. In response, the Bishop of Manchester expressed “deep disappointment” and concern that those who treasure marriage have been “marginalized” by the positioning of the issue as a “civil rights” matter. The law establishes civil and religious marriage licenses and allows each party to a marriage to be identified as bride, groom or spouse. Same-sex couples already in civil unions will be assumed to have a “civil marriage,” the Associated Press says. The governor had required that religious freedom protections be added to a bill previously passed by the legislature. The religious freedom protections contained in the newly-approved law consist of one sentence saying that church-related organizations that serve charitable or educational purposes are exempt from having to provide insurance and other benefits to same-sex “spouses” of employees. The law also specified that all religious organizations, associations or societies have exclusive control over their religious doctrines, policies, teachings and beliefs on marriage, protections presumably guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Lynch’s proposed language was rejected by two votes. The latest vote concerned a revised bill negotiated with the Senate. The bill passed the New Hampshire Senate by a vote of 14-10, while the House passed it 198-176. At the signing ceremony, Lynch said “Today, we are standing up for the liberties of same-sex couples by making clear that they will receive the same rights, responsibilities — and respect — under New Hampshire law.” Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire V. Gene Robinson, an open homosexual whose election as bishop caused a deep split in his church, praised the law. He said it is about “being recognized as whole people and whole citizens.” The Catholic Bishop of Manchester John B. McCormack said in a statement obtained by CNA that he was “deeply disappointed” by the signing of the bill. “The new law passed our Legislature through the narrowest of margins with precipitous haste and without extensive study,” he critiqued. “The law strikes a blow to the cornerstone on which our entire civilization is built and sustained: the marriage between one man and one woman.” “In a manner unlike any other relationship, the union of a husband and wife makes a unique and irreplaceable contribution to the common good of society. A man and a woman in a marriage bring children to life and model the way in which women and men live interdependently and commit, for the whole of life, to seek the good of each other. Our state has an obligation to protect the unique gift of marriage between one man and one woman.” Bishop McCormack said he would continue to teach about the nature of marriage, a “natural truth” confirmed by “divine Revelation” that marriage is a “faithful, exclusive, lifelong union of a man and a woman.” “As a citizen of this state, I am troubled that those who respect and treasure marriage as it has been understood for thousands of years have been marginalized while others position same sex marriage as a ‘civil rights’ issue. Marriage and same-sex unions are essentially different realities.” He added that upholding marriage is “just” and does not offend the dignity or rights of homosexuals. “I pray that the citizens of this state will recognize the clear need for a constitutional amendment on marriage,” he said. Subscriber comments:
Published by: ann
Belton, Texas 06/06/2009 09:18 PM EST
The pagan agenda will keep spreading because these misguided people want to live in sin while having their illicit lifestyle validated by a law on the books. And the electorate who choose political expediency over morality are just as culpable--maybe more so.
Published by: steve abril
tamarac,fl. 06/05/2009 04:25 PM EST
state legislatures in general need to think carfully the ramaficatons of this course of action. Marrige is never intended to be a unlimited right. It exist in a social weave.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
04:50 am | Archbishops Nienstedt and Chaput defend CCHD as criticisms continue 01:46 am | Holy Father reminds the hearing impaired they are also recipients of the Gospel 09:07 pm | CNN poll finds 61% of Americans oppose government-funded abortions 08:02 pm | USCCB: Senate health care bill 'morally unacceptable' 05:54 pm | Mexican expert: Don’t believe false 'end of world' Mayan prophecies Related news :
New York Catholic bishops strongly oppose legalized same-sex 'marriage' New Hampshire lawmakers reject amended same-sex ‘marriage’ bill New Hampshire Gov.’s same-sex ‘marriage’ religious freedom plan applies only ‘in some instances’ New York Assembly casts ‘terribly misguided’ vote to recognize same-sex ‘marriage’ Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

