Australian state bans biology program because of pro-life connections
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- A biology program originally approved in the Australian state of New South Wales to teach public schoolchildren about the “Wonder of Life” before birth has been banned because of its creator’s connections to pro-life groups.

In March, the New South Wales Department of Education and Training had approved The Wonder of Life (Before Birth) program to be taught in fifth and sixth year classrooms as part of the personal development, health and physical education curriculum. The program, which uses life-sized dolls of the fetal development of a baby, was created by Bruce Coleman, a former executive director of the pro-life group NSW Right to Life.

The Sydney Morning Herald then reported on Coleman’s link to NSW Right to Life, which it characterized as an “anti-abortion lobby group.”

The report resulted in the state education department banning the group from visiting schools. The education department has also announced a review of the approval process.

Coleman, a former management committee member for the Christian Democratic Party, was an unsuccessful CDP candidate in the 2004 election.

Speaking to the Sydney Morning Herald, Coleman said the program was “very much biology” and said he “doesn’t get involved in the politics at all.” The program does not mention abortion “in the primary context” because it is “not appropriate,” he said.

Coleman also runs the company The Choices of Life Inc., the Australian distributor of the pro-life merchandise marketed by Heritage House, a U.S. company. Its range of fetal life-sized dolls is used in the disputed program.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Greg Smith, a Liberal MP, supported the creation of The Choices of Life in 2007.

Smith, a former president of NSW Right to Life, said he did not see a problem with Coleman’s program being taught in public schools.

Associate Professor Anne Mitchell of La Trobe University, an expert in sex education in schools, told the Sydney Morning Herald it was entirely appropriate for children in years five and six to be taught about conception, pregnancy and life in the womb.

"My problem would be if it's put in an ideological framework, if it's being used to influence people's thinking about abortion," she said.

A spokesman for the Department of Education and Training said that the The Wonder of Life (Before Birth) presentation has been removed from the department’s website and the company responsible for presenting it has been told it is not authorized to present in NSW public schools.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: rudy
nsw 06/26/2009 12:08 AM EST
well adopting the child would be the ethical choice but education system has adopted unspiritual stance it seems.i dont understand the division between science and religious beliefs.god created science as well hmmm
Published by: John Hayes
Rockhampton Qld Aus 06/23/2009 04:35 PM EST
The connections of the author should not be the criterion of judgement for the programme but accuracy of the material included.
Published by: Jean
NY 06/20/2009 03:34 PM EST
"My problem would be if it's put in an ideological framework, if it's being used to influence people's thinking about abortion," she said.

What is wrong with the above statement.
This statement is very revealing.
So is this lady saying its wrong for a society to change because they know that abortion is immoral.
So the question is what is the agenda of the Pro-Abortion movement?
This statement also says totalitarianism.
So whats wrong with trying to persuade society that abortion is wrong and that it has been detrimental to society on different levels of that societies development as well.
So forget that some of us are pro-life what if were finding out that abortion isnt working for the world in a positive manner at all and that it is presenting new problems?
I think this statement should be clarified as well.
What I want to know is why the Pro-Life movement is being shut up in dictatorship way?
This to is dangerous in a democratic society.
So is there more to this than just a person's right to choose?
Lets ask this question of our people as well.
How are babies dangerous to a society?
There is more to this agenda?
Published by: catherine kennedy
melbourne australia 06/16/2009 06:10 PM EST
We want to see this government BAN a person with pro abortion links too from speaking or running any educational programmes in their schoosl! so how about that or say deleting Emilys list from their links
well equal treatment for all! fair play
sick and tired of pro abortionists thinking they can dictate the agenda the pro abortion mindset is running RANCID in the world people are sick of it they have had enough
the pro abortionits all so CONVENIENTLY forget they are all here because someone didnt ABORT them simple as that!
Published by: Raymond Peringer
Toronto, Canada 06/16/2009 02:28 PM EST
Quality education teaches us to follow truth wherever it may lead.

What is it that the Australian Department of Education and Training fears about the truth?
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa