|
|
||||||||
|
Renowned moral theologian weighs-in on Theology of the Body debate
![]() Fr. Maurizio Faggioni, OFM.
Related articles:
.- Fr. Maurizio Faggioni, OFM, a professor at the top pontifical institute for moral theology, the Pontifical Academy “Alphonsianum,” said in a recent interview with Catholic News Agency that the teachings of the Church suggest “far more prudence” in approaching some of the issues raised by Christopher West in his presentation of the Theology of the Body. Faggioni, a Franciscan who teaches at the Alphonsianum, an academy named upon the father of modern Moral theology, St. Alphonsus of Liguori, is one of the most consulted moral theologians and is an advisor to several Vatican dicasteries. In a conversation with CNA, Fr. Faggioni explained that some of the issues discussed publicly by West, such as the appropriateness of anal sex or other forms of sexual “foreplay” in married relationships, have to be dealt with using great care, since “the risk is of displacing the attention from marital love and the anthropologic meaning of lovely gestures to merely the genital aspects.” “Sexuality,” Fr. Faggioni said, launching into his analysis of West's presentation of the Theology of the Body, “is the language of love and this language is authentic only when it is respectful of the meaning of human love.” According to the moral theologian, “the traditional moral theology certainly does not prohibit intimacy among spouses, but it never regards them as a substitute for the marital embrace and accepts intimacy only as a path toward a complete sexual union.” Moreover, Fr. Faggioni said that “it is simply not true that the traditional Catholic moral supports the use of acts that Thomas Aquinas call contra naturam -against nature- (such as anal sex) as something ordinary.” “Catholic moral theology calls us to be very discrete in discussing these issues, and encourages being particularly respectful to the sensibilities of persons and couples,” the Italian Franciscan explained. “Regarding this type of intercourse or others, no one can pretend to accept from another person something that offends that person’s sensibility on sexual issues or that does not respect the structure and natural complementarity of the bodies of man and woman.” The moral theologian warned that “today’s youth, in a special manner, have to be protected from unnecessary exposure to sexual-genital issues that can lead to a morbid curiosity.” “This is not prudishness, but the wisdom of the Church that has time and again demonstrated the importance of discretion and prudence when it comes to sexual issues,” he added. “When we make these types of assertions in an indiscriminate manner, we are actually getting into the beds of married couples, and that is something the moral teaching of the Church does not encourage at all.” Regarding the practice of blessing the genitals before a sexual relationship, Fr. Faggioni expressed “real perplexity.” “Without doubt, all the body in each one of its parts is God’s creation and deserves honor. We precisely respect our private parts by surrounding them with greater respect and modesty.” “In itself,” he continued, “nothing forbids thanking God for the sexual body of oneself or the spouse, but from the perspective of Christian anthropology, it is not right to emphasize the genitals as if our sexuality could be reduced to them. “Love is made with all the body, with the entire person’s humanity, not only with the genitals.” Fr. Faggioni also explained that Pope John Paul never intended to specifically address the sexual Puritanism of the United States. “Pope John Paul wanted to distance himself equally from the moral relativism that trivializes sex, as much as from the Puritanism that considers sex as taboo,” he explained. The late Pope, the moral theologian also said “exalted the beauty of the body and sexuality, but also taught that the body cannot be used as an instrument, as if it would not be the bearer of a meaning and values that man and woman are called to embrace and live with gratefulness and fidelity,” he said on ending. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Adrian Reimers
South Bend, IN, USA 07/13/2009 02:11 PM EST
Mike from Nebraska's criticism is troubling, because it fosters a division that should not be there. Some knowledgeable Catholics (such as C West) are gifted with dynamic personalities and an ability to reach and inspire crowds. Others are gifted with an ability to teach future pastors and ministers in the classroom, as well as to study John Paul's writings closely and in minute detail. Fr Faggioni appears to be such a scholar.
As St Paul teaches (1 Cor 12), there are many gifts. We do each other and the Church a serious disservice if we try to set one against another. The 'popularizer' and evangelist like West should take seriously the critical comments of the academic scholars, while the latter should admire the zeal and effectiveness of the former, even as they offer needed critiques and advice. With charity as our guide, we should not belittle each other. Nor should we see this as a matter of choosing up sides.
Published by: Mike
Nebraska 07/06/2009 01:04 AM EST
I've been following this controversy and now believe this is not at all about Christopher West's interpretation of Theology of the Body. This is about jealousy and embassassment. These "experts" taking pot shots at West and Smith are jealous because West and Smith are actually getting somewhere with teaching the general public while these "experts" are unknown outside their own offices. They're also embaressed because West and Smith are doing what these "experts" are being paid by the Church to do, while these "experts" sit around being redundant.
If these experts are so good they need to stop whining and start teaching us how to live holier lives rather than publishing papers in professional journals that no one reads.
Published by: dAVID LARSEN
scituate Mass 07/05/2009 10:31 AM EST
There is CIRCUS SEX and that form of sex,that is expressed with great AFFECTION. Pornography depicts sex as a circus of daring new and exciting moves to be tried during the next sex session for an individual on their next encounter.
The encounter in the natural setting is one of affection and for the partners involved,it should be a beautiful experience as in hearing very fine music. There should be no shame in sex between committed partners in a loving marital relationship. Sex is that simple. God made a man and a woman for sex to procreate and share in God's eternal plan of creation. Sex is a beautiful vehicle for creation of new souls to share in life's eternal plan a yearning for life as life is an end in itself. In Jesus Christ we learn that life is eternal,for the Glory of God,in the power of the Holy Spirit.
Published by: Mary
Media,PA,USA 07/04/2009 10:20 PM EST
Thank you for this helpful and beautiful reflection. Fr. Faggioni gently and respectfully directs us back to the true meaning of the theology of the body.
Published by: Ted
Lewiston, ID, USA 07/04/2009 11:03 AM EST
Oddly enough, what one must seek is youthful people fully knowledgeable of sexual biology to the point of a 'so what' that makes love the necessary spice for enjoyment. Sex without love should become incomplete, in their minds.
Published by: Mena
West Chester, PA, USA 07/04/2009 10:39 AM EST
I'm a trained sexologist, I have never read a more succinct truth about sexuality than, “Love is made with all the body, with the entire person’s humanity, not only with the genitals.” Simply beautiful.
Published by: Nemo sum.
Dayton, OH 45415 07/03/2009 10:47 PM EST
West is more Kinsey than St.Alphonsus; more "Lady Chatterly's Lover" than "Pride and Prejudice". The common-
sense sexual solutions are found in Divine advice-thru Aristotle: "Love is the mutual willing of good." Mere mechanics are learned by marital experience, not lectures that con- tain vulgarisms; for example, West's claims for anal/fecal sex need proof that the rectum is a surrogate vagina. Good luck.
Published by: Catholic Femina
Florida USA 07/03/2009 08:36 PM EST
Reducing sexuality to pleasure is a risk that Christopher West runs... He is attempting to return human sexuality to a pre-fallen state with humans bearing the results of original sin. He puts a lot of emphasis on sexuality, and this is important...but it is not everything and it can be taken to an extreme and move to lust. Lust of spouses turns quickly to utilitarianism and can kill a relationship. I believe that West is on the right path, although he needs to remember temptation exists and too much emphasis on sexuality without proper discernment will hurt more than help. He will risk degrading the beautiful union, we must pray for God to help married couples find contentment and happiness with each other.
Published by: Deacon Dick Murtaugh
Greenville?SC?USA 07/03/2009 07:36 PM EST
Thanks be to God! A wonderful message.
God Bless Father Faggioni, OFM.
Published by: Robert
MA USA 07/03/2009 06:53 PM EST
Thank God for this man and his clarity of thought. He thinks and speaks truly in the spirit and tradition of St Alphonsus!
Published by: Michael
Denver 07/03/2009 06:46 PM EST
It is the opinion of many that fellatio and sodomy, regardless of whether ejaculation occurs, are not foreplay. They are unnatural manners of copulation. Many couples believe it justly should be discouraged. I would not say it is a grave matter, but it is an unnatural and unhealthy preoccupation with the genitals and sensuality.
Published by: Sean
Roswell, GA USA 07/03/2009 04:33 PM EST
God covered it with Moses in five words.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
09:07 pm | CNN poll finds 61% of Americans oppose government-funded abortions 08:02 pm | USCCB: Senate health care bill 'morally unacceptable' 05:54 pm | Mexican expert: Don’t believe false 'end of world' Mayan prophecies 02:36 pm | Expert explains upcoming battle over pro-abortion Senate health care bill 01:22 pm | Fourteenth Fort Hood victim forgotten Related news :
Janet Smith says criticisms of West ‘unfair’ and ‘unsubstantiated’ Christopher West’s teaching warrants uneasiness, theologian warns 'Catholic sexual revolution' not proper response, Fr. Granados replies to Christopher West JPII translator defends Christopher West against criticism and ‘harmful’ spin Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

