Pro-life Rep. Bart Stupak claims enough votes to stop health care bill over abortion
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) / House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi

.- Drawing opposition from pro-abortion politicians and activists, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) is leading a coalition of about 40 pro-life Democrats who are petitioning for an opportunity to vote Hyde Amendment-like abortion funding restrictions into the proposed health care reform legislation.

Rep. Stupak is negotiating with Congressional leaders to resolve the dispute. He has threatened to block action on the larger health care reform bill unless he is allowed to offer a stand-alone amendment during floor debate to include the Hyde Amendment, the Associated Press reports.

The amendment would bar federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape and incest or if the mother’s life would be endangered. The amendment applies to Medicaid funding, requiring that states which cover abortion for low-income women can only use state taxpayer money, and not federal funds.

In its current form, the health care reform bill would create a new stream of federal funds outside the restrictions of the Hyde Amendment.

Rep. Stupak has criticized current language that purports to segregate federal funds and funds used in abortions.

"Once you get the affordability credits (subsidies) in there, that's public funding of abortion. We're not going there," Stupak told the Associated Press. "How do you get past the affordability credits is really the issue. And we can't."

Speaking to CNSNews.com on Thursday, Stupak said that his group of “about 40 likeminded Democrats” will vote to kill the health-care bill if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) does not allow a floor vote on his amendment.

“We will try to—we, there’s about 40 likeminded Democrats like myself—we’ll try to take down the rule,” Stupak said. “If all 40 of us vote in a bloc against the rule—because we think the Republicans will join us—we can defeat the rule. The magic number is 218. If we can have 218 votes against the rule, we win.”

To block the bill, he must assemble “no” votes on a procedural measure that needs to pass before debate can begin. Stupak says he thinks he can gather about 220 "no" votes.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, claimed that everything possible has been done to ensure abortion services will not be federally funded. He said he is working on the issue with Rep. Stupak.

According to the Associated Press, Rep. Waxman said that Rep. Stupak’s preferred provision would deny any subsidy money to any insurance plan that includes abortion coverage. This would deny to women what he said were legal and sometimes medically necessary procedures.

The pro-abortion group NARAL Pro-Choice America has criticized the present form of the bill, arguing that it singles out abortion from “other health care services.”

“Apparently it was necessary to stop anti-choice politicians from continuing to use health care reform to attack a woman's right to choose,” the group’s president Nancy Keenan said.

NARAL has sent a letter to supporters singling out Rep. Stupak for criticism and asking them to call congressmen to ensure his defeat.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has said it cannot support a health care reform bill unless the pro-life language is strengthened.

Commenting on Friday, National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) Legislative Director Douglas Johnson said the proposed bill “explicitly authorizes” the public plan to pay for elective abortions.

“Democratic leaders, including President Obama, have claimed that no federal funds would be used to pay for abortions, but this is a deception, because the public plan will be a federal agency program that can spend only federal funds. The federal government would pay abortion providers for performing elective abortions -- a sharp break from decades of federal policy."

“Recent polls show strong public opposition to government funding of abortion and abortion coverage," he added, saying an amendment would be needed to remove abortion from the federal plan.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Susan
Cambridge, MA 11/11/2009 07:59 PM EST
Not a Catholic, but I stumbled on this site. Thank God for folks like Stupak. Chuck is mistaken about reducing women to the level of sheep and pigs. Pigs taste better and sheep don't hog the remote control. That said, Chuck, lay off the drama. It's not like they can't still get abortions with their VISA cards.
Published by: Chuck
Manassas, va 11/08/2009 06:43 AM EST
The man is an idiot and has set women back to the level of sheep and pigs, who cannot make decisions for themselves.
Published by: Pat
KCMO 11/01/2009 10:09 PM EST
We the people know the lies, and we continue to speak our truth. Prayer and fasting must be our weapons of choice. This battle is not of human making but it is of human action. Pray for conversion of heart and minds this is our strongest weapon. Stupak and his 40 signers are doing a good job. We the people must do our part too. Recognizing we are personally weak but mighty in prayer must move all our priests and religious leaders to call for surrendered hearts. May God have mercy.
Published by: Daniel Squillante
Gulfport, Ms. USA 10/26/2009 02:09 PM EST
Prayer is the answer. Be thankful we have some elected offcials who know whats at stake, eternal life.
Published by: Betty
Concord Mi USA 10/26/2009 12:40 PM EST
No abortion money period. The begining of life is in God's hands no matter how that life begins. He is perfect and makes no "Mistakes"rt7jf
Published by: charles r rhoades
san diego 10/25/2009 06:02 PM EST
although I do not favor the curent proposed health care plan, the gov't has failed to run two plans, i.e. medicare and medicaid,and should just improve the current system, in no way should abortion be part of any plan put forth. Abortion, except in possible rare cases, is simply a choice, not a required medical procedure and should not be funded by the populace.
Published by: CJ FOLEY
Richland/WA/USA 10/25/2009 05:47 PM EST
I oppose the health insurance plan being cobbled together by the extremists in both the Senate and the House. It is a tax measure sailing under a false flag, and an attack on the freedoms of we citizens. The present effort should be scuttled in entirety. Maybe some kind of bi-partisan thing could be assembled in a leisurely manner. There is no emergency here, so if a good thing could be done over a 2 or 5 year time, that's what should be tried. Obviously the Democrats for Death (Pelosi et al) want unlimited abortion and more. PLEASE keep them from success. The Democrat plan would require me to pay for child executions by my tax moneys. This is a moral no-no for me and mine
Published by: robert matzinger
taylor/michigan/usa 10/24/2009 06:29 PM EST
Let us Catholics stand with representative Stupak and put pressure on other members of the house to stand with him to deny all federal funding for abortions.!And state funding for abortions. Let us Catholics stand up with our Bishops to deny Obama's health care plans and programs that advocate and support abortions (murder) upon demand!
Published by: christlee
temple city/ca/usa 10/24/2009 06:14 PM EST
Thanks God!!!
Published by: Dan
Santa Fe 10/24/2009 10:04 AM EST
Abortion is not 'health care'. It needs to be specifically excluded to stop anti-life politicians from denying the right of a child to life.
Published by: Ro
Dumfries/VA/USA 10/23/2009 06:54 PM EST
Those of us who, like myself, cannot vote for Rep. Stupak because they don't live in his district, ought to pray for him, not only that his present effort succeeds, but also that he finds favor in the eyes of his constituents.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa