Canadian bishop rebuffs government tribunal’s authority to interfere in Church governance
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Bishop Nicola De Angelis

.- Responding to the claims of an adult altar server who reported the Diocese of Peterborough to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal for removing him from service, Bishop of Peterborough Nicola De Angelis has denied the authority of the tribunal to interfere in Church governance and has appealed for Catholic unity.

Jim Corcoran, who was an adult altar server at St. Michaels’ Church in Coburg, Ontario until last April, has charged that he was removed because of his sexual orientation. According to the Peterborough Examiner, Corcoran says he lives as a “chaste gay man.” His partner was also reported to have been an altar server.

Corcoran reported that the request for him to step aside came after the bishop was sent a petition signed by twelve parishioners. He said that he still attends the parish, but those who signed the letter of complaint do not.

“I stepped aside -- but I challenged the version of why I was asked to step aside,” he told the Peterborough Examiner. "I am not being disloyal to the bishop. I did what was asked -- but I am asking for accountability for the decision. I'm simply asking why I was asked to step down. The only possible answer is because I'm gay."

Corcoran filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.

Bishop De Angelis responded to the controversy at the parish in a September 12 letter to St. Michael’s parishioners and the faithful of the diocese.

Explaining that he wrote with “sadness of heart,” he said recent events at the parish have revealed an attitude “contrary to the life and nature of the Church.”

The bishop expressed puzzlement that “secular powers and government agencies” believe they can criticize the Church about her internal rules and regulations.

“If the Human Rights Tribunal should choose to interfere with the Church's governance, this will be most shocking,” Bishop De Angelis wrote. “The Tribunal has no authority to place itself as an arbiter of canonical precepts.”

He characterized the central question as being whether volunteer service is a right. In the Church’s view, it is not a right but an “invitation” that the pastor or bishop can terminate at any time, particularly when the volunteer service causes “tension, animosity, discord or division” in parish life.

He cited a July 27, 2001 letter of then-Prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship Cardinal Jorge A. Medina Estevez, who strongly reaffirmed that altar boys should be encouraged to help foster vocations to the priesthood. The cardinal also said that the non-ordained faithful “do not have the right to service at the altar.”

“It follows that to call oneself a Catholic while challenging the Church and Her internal discipline entrusted to the bishops, is a contradiction,” Bishop De Angelis explained.

Responding to the charge of discrimination based on sexual orientation, the bishop wrote that he can honestly say he treated all volunteers the same.

“I am at a loss to understand how there has been any misinterpretation of a practical decision made with honesty and without any discrimination,” he said.

According to the bishop, the original unrest at St. Michael’s was the refusal of “a few parishioners” to accept a new pastor. Some parish volunteers were the objects of “tension, criticism and division,” which led the bishop to meet with the church’s pastor, Fr. Allan Hood, and to correspond with various parishioners.

“I then asked Fr. Hood to kindly invite the volunteers involved, particularly those who were the object of tension and disagreement, to step aside and give the chance to other volunteers to serve,” the bishop recalled.

He reported that these volunteers included some who served as readers, Eucharistic ministers, adult altar services, Church Restoration Committee members and others.

“I asked Father Hood to thank them for the service done so far in the Parish, but to know that it was now time to allow others the chance to serve as volunteers,” the bishop wrote. He added that he had personally written to remind them that their volunteer services was on a “temporary basis” and their stepping down would allow all parishioners the opportunity to volunteer.

Those who stepped down, despite some “sadness and frustration,” did so in “humility and obedience” to the bishop.

Concluding his letter, Bishop De Angelis said that Catholics go to church to share the “bread of life” that “makes us one.” He noted St. Paul’s comments in the Letter to the Galatians that “all are one in Christ Jesus.”

“Even though we play different roles, we all have the same dignity - that of being children of God created in His image and likeness,” the bishop continued, encouraging St. Michael’s parishioners to reconcile with each other “in humility and obedience to the bishop.”

Canadian human rights tribunals have previously been used against Catholics by homosexuals who allege discrimination. In 2005 Bishop Fred Henry of Calgary was the subject of a complaint to the Alberta Human Rights Commission because of a pastoral letter he issued to parishioners in January against homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.”

In February 2007 the Canadian magazine Catholic Insight faced a Canadian Human Rights Commission complaint from a man who used isolated quotes from the magazine to claim it created a tone of “extreme hatred and contempt” against homosexuals. Although the complaint was dropped in July of 2008, the modestly funded magazine was forced to incur over $20,000 in legal expenses.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: catherine
burlington 09/15/2009 01:07 PM EST
Thankyou Bishop De Angelis. The travesty committed by The Ontario H.R. Tribunal is simply the State taking control and it has done so insidiously, creeping ever so slowly into our lives so that we don't notice and the collective voice of the people of the Faithful is dulled. The bureaucratic body of the State (not elected) with increasing regularity are apparently looking to control not only our physical bodies but also our minds and now we come to the soul! How dare they come into our beautiful Church family who have seen its share of attacks over the past decade. How dare they try to deconstruct the Faith of Our Fathers that has stood for thousands of years! I will stand by you 'til death! God Be With You Your Excellency. Catherine
Published by: myles keogh
Fort Riley Kansas 09/15/2009 12:33 PM EST
Terence, Obviously you miss the point. The man is openly gay and appears to be involved in a a relationship with another openly gay man. Whether they are actively engaged in a sexual relationship is not revealed by the plaintiffs claim that he is chaste. The fact that they are in a "relationship" is enough warrant his removal. To not remove him or ask him to step down would create confusion among the faithful especially young people with regards to the church's stance on homosexuality. No one is attacking this man's dignity as a person. What is being eliminated is the confusion his lifestyle and sexual preference may create as a result of his acting as an altar server. He is the one making an issue of it by his ridiculous complaint. But this is typical of the homosexual community and their efforts to shove their lifestyle down everyone's throats.
Published by: mary
canada 09/15/2009 08:20 AM EST
Thank you Bishop De Angelis for being a true Apostle and courageous son of our Church and standing up in a completely secular country and stating the truth. And it is time we all stood up and took back what belongs to us.. No government has the right to tell'the Church' what to do and certainly as we all know the Ontario Human Rights Commission has been well named a 'kangaroo court'. It is time that the Government officials stepped in and stopped this travesty. The Church and we members are the ones who are having our rights trampled on by these people and they are wasting the time and energy of the good Bishop and many good people. Pierre Trudeau once made the famous statement ' that the Government has no role in the ..." yes and the OHC has no role on our altars or churches. State and Church - was defined by many Canadian prime ministers as being 'completely separate' - right..so now stand by your words..
Published by: Terence Weldon
United Kingdom 09/15/2009 02:28 AM EST
"Explaining that he wrote with “sadness of heart,” he said recent events at the parish have revealed an attitude “contrary to the life and nature of the Church.” " Agreed. We have no business judging the interior state of any person’s soul. There is no sin in having a homosexual orientation, and Corcoran insists that he lives a chaste lifestyle. The church teaches furthermore that we are to promote social justice. It is abundantly clear that this exclusion is entirely contrary to the life and nature of the Church. It is scandalous that a handful of anonymous petitioners, who no longer attend the parish, have contrived to drive away a dedicated servant of the church. Bishop de Angelis says he is appealing for unity in the church: how does driving away gay Catholics improve unity? Or is he only interested in the unioty of the self-proclaimed righteous? He fulminates further about the state interference in church affairs: does he get equally agitated about church interference in state affairs, when it raises money to influence voting about civil marriage? The only scandal here is not about the alter server with a same-sex orientation seeking redress fro a clear offence, but the scandalous behaviour of a servant of the church who has clearly violated church principles to appease a handful of bigots.
Published by: Alice
Seattle, WA 09/14/2009 11:54 PM EST
Thank the Lord that we do not have anything called "human rights tribunals" in the United States. It sounds scary -- I pray that we never will. Beautiful quote by the Bishop: "Even though we play different roles, we all have the same dignity - that of being children of God created in His image and likeness.”
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa