Catholic reporter fired over comment on same-sex 'marriage' campaign
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- A localized media frenzy has ensued after a Catholic reporter was let go from his 19-year position at a Maine newspaper for voicing his opinion against same-sex “marriage” and the campaign to legalize it in Maine.

According to an article by the Maine Public Broadcasting Network, Larry Grard, a former employee of the Morning Sentinel, was sent a mass email from the pro-gay rights organization, Human Rights Campaign (HRC), following the repeal of the same-sex “marriage” law in Maine during the mid-term elections on Nov. 4.

In the email, Trevor Thomas, spokesman for the HRC, voiced his disappointment with the vote results and allegedly stated that opponents of same-sex 'marriage' built their arguments on “lies and hate.”

Thomas told CNA that Grard responded to the mass email from his personal email account and said “who are the venom-spewing ones? Hint: not the Yes on 1 crowd. You hateful people have been spreading nothing but vitriol since this campaign began. Good riddance!”

Although CNA asked Thomas for the original HRC statement that Grard responded to, Thomas did not provide it.

According to Thomas, he forwarded Grard's email response to reporter's boss and wrote, “it's frankly, just not acceptable coming from a news organization the morning after our defeat.” Though Thomas insisted that he did not ask for Grard's termination, Grard was fired on Nov. 10 and his wife's bi-weekly cooking column for the paper was canceled.

The Maine Public Broadcasting Network stated that Grard has since apologized. “He had an emotional reaction to this email and sent off a reply and he recognizes that it was a mistake – that it wasn't professional,” said Tom Bell, president of Grard's union, the Portland Newspaper Guild.

Bell continued to say that workers for the paper have a union contract that calls for “progressive discipline” which means that if someone makes a mistake, they are given a chance to rectify the situation before drastic action, such as termination, is taken. “The issue here is that we feel the company overreacted,” said Bell.  “For someone like Larry, who's 58, this is a one-way ticket into poverty.”

Bill Donohue of the Catholic League has also taken up Grard's case and referred him to several pro-bono law firms that handle situations of Catholic workers who are victims of discrimination due to their beliefs.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Concerned Mom
Medfield, MA 12/17/2009 07:34 PM EST
If the situation was the other way,the apology would have been accepted and no one would have lost their job. Christians are under fire and cannot state their opinions. This I have experienced. We are expected to go along to get along.
Published by: Camillo
INdia 12/17/2009 12:17 AM EST
Larry, Keep up the faith, God is your provider and he will take care of you and your family. Fear not who destroy the body but fear Him who can destroy both body and soul.
Published by: W. James
Sacramento/CA/USA 12/16/2009 11:51 PM EST
If Grard answered the mass e-mail from his private e-mail account, then he did so not as a reporter, but as a private citizen. While I support the standard definition of marriage, Grard's reply was very insensitive. Yet, the mistake would have been greater had he answered the mass e-mail from his newspaper e-mail account. In that case, his reply would have been both insensitive and unprofessional. Still, the writer of the mass e-mail is accountable for provoking hatred by falsely accusing others of hatred. The punishment of firing the reporter is disproportionate to the "crime" of insensitivity. Two wrongs do not make a right, but Grard was no more insensitive than the writer of the mass e-mail. Unfortunately, in the culture war, the first casualty all too often is civility.
Published by: JeffreyRO5
Royal Oak, MI 12/16/2009 04:16 PM EST
He wasn't fired for being Catholic but for being dispassionate in his response to a mass emailing. It was inappropriate for a newspaper reporter. That's why he apologized. No one asked for his firing; his boss decided that himself.
Published by: KansasGirl
Kansas City USA 12/16/2009 09:50 AM EST
Typical lib response. Their way or no way.
Published by: Eileen Williams
Vernonia, OR USA 12/16/2009 03:04 AM EST
I think the reporter's email was a normal response to being accused of being hateful and a liar. He should be applauded for standing up for the normal, traditional definition of marriage all around the planet....the union of one man and one woman. He has my respect and admiration.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa