Coalition seeks repeal of Klan-era ban on religious garb in Oregon schools
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- Religious freedom advocates have asked the Oregon legislature for an immediate repeal of a decades-old law that bars Oregon teachers from wearing religious dress in public schools. The law, originally an anti-Catholic measure, was implemented with the support of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s.

Current Oregon law bars religious Jews from wearing yarmulkes, religious Sikhs from wearing turbans, and religious Muslim women from wearing a headscarf.

According to the Oregonian, the law was designed to prevent priests and nuns from wearing their clerics and habits in the classroom. It was part of a bill that barred Japanese-Americans from owning property in the state.

A coalition of interfaith civil rights and bar association organizations, including the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, sent a letter to state legislative leaders asking for the repeal of the law.

“It is amazing that Oregon, of all places, would want to keep religious minorities from getting a fair shot at public school jobs,” Eric Rassbach, National Litigation Director at the Washington, D.C.-based Becket Fund, said in a press release. “Why should anyone care if Mr. Singh wears a turban while teaching physics class?”

The law was upheld in a 1986 Oregon Supreme Court decision. The Oregonian reports that the court sided with the Eugene School District when it fired a Sikh teacher for wearing a turban, as is required by her faith.

The Oregon ACLU is leading supporters of the ban on religious clothing. They have argued that allowing religious clothing could lead to the indoctrination of children.

Oregon ACLU director David Fidanque has told the Oregonian that repealing the law could endanger the “religious neutrality” of public schools.

He reported his organization has received many complaints charging that some schools do too much to promote Christianity. Fidanque also voiced concern that lifting the ban on religious dress could lead some teachers to wear Jesus T-shirts or take other steps to evangelize at school.

Rassbach was critical of the ACLU affiliate’s support for the ban.

“You wouldn’t think that the ACLU would be channeling the Klan. But sadly the ACLU is doing everything it can to keep religious Jews, Sikhs, Muslims, and Catholics from being public school teachers.”

Oregon is one of three states that forbid public school teachers from wearing religious dress in the classroom.

Other laws backed by the Klan in Oregon included a 1922 law which required children to attend public schools, threatening the existence of Catholic parochial schools. A Catholic religious order helped launch legal challenges to the law, which was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1925 ruling Pierce v. Society of Sisters.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Charles Saunders
Metamora, Ohio 02/08/2010 10:50 PM EST
I concur with many of the above comments. For your information, there are several excellent organizations out there that support Religious Expression in the Public Square. 1) Alliance Defense Fund, 2) American Center for Liberty and Justice, ACLJ, 3) The Beckett Fund, 4) The Liberty Fund, 5) The Thomas More Legal Center in Ann Arbor Michigan. All of these groups are working hard to counterbalance the efforts of the ACLU and can use your prayers, support and CASH. Litigation is not cheap!!! The ACLU intimidates and has a slew of lawyers who work for free and schools and municipalities cave in lieu of expensive litigation. These groups offer attorneys and legal assistance for our side. Just FYI.
Published by: Don Guillermo
West Sacramento/CA/USA 02/08/2010 10:18 PM EST
One poster protests the smearing of the opposition by association with the KKK. Yet, KKK support is used here as evidence that the law was truly an anti-Catholic measure. The KKK is anti-Catholic. Thus, the defenders of this bad law have only smeared themselves.
Published by: Rory Flick
California 02/08/2010 07:26 PM EST
Quoting "The Oregon ACLU is leading supporters of the ban on religious clothing. They have argued that allowing religious clothing could lead to the indoctrination of children." The ACLU is promoting the indocrination of children to ANTI-RELIGION (anti-1st ammendment) and LIBERALISM. If I openly wear a crucifix to work, and I have, THAT IS MY 1st Amendment right. What the ACLU is doing IS bigotry. Civil LIBERTIES, hmm... There supposed to protect peoples rights, not try to take them away.
Published by: Chuck Rose
Hendersonville, NC United States 02/08/2010 03:26 PM EST
Banning clothing does nothing to keep "religion" out. A person "living" their faith provides witness without words. the only way to stop it is to keep people of faith out of schools. Oops can't do that - discrimination! Talk about a rock and a hard place, i wonder what the ACLU will do?
Published by: John
LA 02/08/2010 01:09 PM EST
"The law, originally an anti-Catholic measure, was implemented with the support of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s." In other words, the Klan had little or nothing to do with the passage of this law, but those who oppose it just wanted to smear the opposition by association. That's how "debate" is carried on in this country. Shame.
Published by: Derek Hachey
Fort McMurray, AB, Canada 02/08/2010 08:32 AM EST
The ACLU supports this descriminatory legislation? WOW! It seems that the ACLU is to the USA what the "Human Rights Commissions" are to Canada.
Published by: Richard Stanislawski
Salem, Oregon, USA 02/08/2010 02:28 AM EST
The struggle to have religeous freedom was one that our founding fathers knew quite well. It seems strange to realize that non believers are threatened by religeon in itself. For it was that very desire that caused many a patriot to lay down his life for this great nation. I wish all would come to believe in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, then perhaps we would see world peace even in our day.
Published by: Don Guillermo
West Sacramento/CA/USA 02/08/2010 12:12 AM EST
Secularity and secularism are different. Secularity means no State religion. That is, civil and clerical authority are kept separate. This is what Vatican II agreed to. Secularism means banning religion from the public square altogether. Oregon's law against religious clothing in public schools is an example of secularism. If children in the other 47 states that allow such clothing have not been "indoctrinated," then, obviously, the ACLU's argument is hollow. Sadly, anti-Catholic bigotry is rampant. It is our duty as Catholics to bear witness to our faith and to "shame the devil" by exposing this bigotry for what it is.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa