Conscience protections sought for Nebraska psychologistsis
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- Responding to concerns that psychologists might be required to counsel homosexual couples about strengthening their relationship, Catholic leaders in Nebraska are asking for conscience protections for psychologists who refuse to treat or refer clients because of religious or moral convictions.

Speaking during a licensing rules hearing before the Board of Mental Health Practice, Nebraska Catholic Conference executive director Jim Cunningham proposed a “convictions of conscience” rule for psychologists. The Lincoln Journal Star reports that he warned that Catholic Charities in Omaha and Catholic Social Services in Lincoln might have to stop hiring licensed counselors and psychologists if they are not protected by the law. The Lincoln agency provides about $100,000 in free mental health services.

While most ethics codes for professional counselors and psychologists permit refusing to offer services based on ethical convictions, the codes generally require the professional to provide a referral for the client.

Cunningham said that even referrals could be a violation of conscience.

Edward Stringham, a Lincoln psychologist, said that the lack of a moral exemption could require a psychologist who believes homosexual relationships are immoral to counsel homosexual couples on improving their relationship.

According to the Journal Star, Stringham pointed to a 2001 federal court case which supported an employer who fired a counselor who refused on moral grounds to provide relationship enhancement counseling to a lesbian.

This is cause for legitimate concerns, Stringham said.

James K. Cole, who represented the Nebraska Psychology Association at the hearing, said that conscience exemptions could allow any provider to discriminate against virtually everyone as long as they claim a conflicting moral or religious belief.

The conscience clause is already part of a proposed rule change for counselors. Its compromise language was worked out between the Nebraska Catholic Conference and the Board of Mental Health Practice this winter.

The Nebraska Catholic Conference has also argued for conscience protections for social workers and marriage and family therapists.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Chris
Lincoln, Nebraska 11/22/2009 11:45 PM EST
Imagine: A gay man whose whole family has just died in an auto accident, has recently lost his job and is homeless, comes to you depressed and suicidal. Can you help? You answer the young man that not only will you not help him BUT you refuse to refer him to a therapist who is will help. You refuse him help because he is gay. Not even to refer him to a different therapist. (btw THAT is how the regulation read: No treatment AND no referral) If the only issue is one of moral conflict on the basis of the clients sexual orientation, then why would there be a "no referral" part to the regulation? To treat a suicidal client in such a manner could be fatal. The regulation could have produced such results thus was overturned.
Published by: Jean
USA 07/23/2009 01:56 PM EST
Found this partical quote surfing:
“The APA’s very process of a medical judgment arrived at by parliamentary method set off more arguments than it settled. Many members felt that the trustees, in acting contrary to diagnostic knowledge, had responded to intense propagandistic pressures from militant homophile organizations. “Politically we said homosexuality is not a disorder,” one psychiatrist admitted, “but privately most of us felt it is.” (Kronemeyer, Overcoming Homosexuality, p.5)
Published by: Jean
USA 07/23/2009 01:52 PM EST
Anyone here if you get the change surf over to the Courage Apostolate.
Published by: Jerome
Oakland 06/20/2009 12:07 PM EST
Even restaurants have signs that they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Food is a basic human need, whereas, counseling is not.
Published by: Chris
Iowa City, IA 06/17/2009 02:44 PM EST
Imagine if gay psychologists asked for protection from working with Catholic clients...would we not label that as discrimination?
Published by: Peter Stringham
Brookline, MA 06/17/2009 09:30 AM EST
(No relation to the Edward Stringham in your article). Psychologists who deny their professional services to any class of people, should have their liscences revoked. If they cannot counsel homosexual couples they are clearly incompetant as psychologists.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa