|
|
||||||||
|
Family and life advocates concerned by Sotomayor's 'judicial activism'
![]() President Obama meets with Sonia Sotomayor in the Oval Office on May 21 / Photo Credit: White House
Related articles:
.- President Obama introduced Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee to replace retiring Justice David Souter this morning at the White House. Conservative court watchers reacted to the announcement by warning that Sotomayor's judicial record shows she is an activist judge. This morning just after 10 a.m., President Obama introduced Sonia Sotomayor, emphasizing her rise from humble beginnings to graduating from Princeton and later Yale. "Along the way," Obama said, she's faced down barriers, overcome the odds, lived out the American Dream that brought her parents here so long ago. ...What Sonia will bring to the Court, then, is not only the knowledge and experience acquired over a course of a brilliant legal career, but the wisdom accumulated from an inspiring life's journey." Sotomayor will be the third woman to serve on the nation's highest court and the first Latina. However, some court watchers are worried by remarks that Sotomayor made in a 2001 speech at Berkeley, where she stated that she believes it is appropriate for judges to consider their "experiences as women and people of color," and that these experiences should "affect our decisions." She went on to say in the same speech, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life." Judge Sotomayor also said in a speech to the Duke Law School in 2005 that the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made," a comment that has stoked fears that she will be an activist judge. Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, commented on the Supreme Court nominee's remarks by saying, "Women are best protected by the rule of law – and blind justice. Their rights are most endangered when personal preference, ideology or painful personal history inform judgment." On the other hand, Judge Sotomayor appeared to distance herself from her remarks about letting personal experiences inform the law when she said today at the White House, "I firmly believe in the rule of law as the foundation for all of our basic rights." While Sotomayor's judicial stance on protecting the unborn is somewhat unknown, the Latina judge did rule against abortion supporters who sued to overturn the Mexico City policy. The pro-abortion group claimed the policy violated their First Amendment, due process and equal protection rights. Concerned Women for America's Wendy Wright called on all senators to demand ample time for a careful and thorough examination of the nominee's record. "A necessary quality for a Supreme Court justice is to be committed to equal treatment of the law, regardless of ethnicity or sex. Sonia Sotomayor has an extensive record and several troubling opinions where she seems willing to expand certain 'rights' beyond what the Constitution establishes and the appropriate Supreme Court precedent," Wright said. One other issue highlighted by CWA is the fact that Sotomayor has a high rate of having her rulings reversed. Out of five cases brought before the Supreme Court, Sotomayor has had the court overturn three of her decisions. Her reversal rate "alone should be enough for us to pause and take a good look at her record. Frankly, it is the Senate's duty to do so," Wright stated. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Robert Matzinger
Taylor/Michigan/USA 05/27/2009 07:31 PM EST
Just because she's had a lot of judicial experience doesn't necessarily mean she'll do a good job on the Supreme Court. One thing that bothers me a bit is that supposeldy the reason Obama really liked is that after meeting her, he found her beliefs about the law and aplictaion of the law was identical to his, and that concerns me.
Published by: Babs
Frazier Park, CA 05/27/2009 03:57 PM EST
President Obama has made clear, by his statements about "empathy", that he does not respect our legal system. As the daughter of a lawyer and as a retired legal assistant myself, I know that the most important charge given to judges and juries alike is to apply the law to the facts--NOT apply the facts to the law, which would produce chaos and favoritism, exactly what the president seems to seek.
"The Cross before me, the world behind me."
Published by: Dr. W. Luckey
Front Royal, VA 05/26/2009 02:42 PM EST
The only "real" qualification of a Supreme Court justice is this: "Will the Justice intrepret the Constitution, our fundamental law, according to the intention of the founders who wrote it?" This is called "original intent." All this other nonsense about her experiences as a Latina, or that she went to Ivy League schools, means absolutely nothing, if she did not learn this. Why do I suspect that she did, not, in fact, learn this? Gee, I wonder!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
Democrats oppose Supreme Court nominees not backed by abortion industry, says priest Fidelis launches animated ad for Alito hearings Christian groups applaud Alito nomination to US Supreme Court Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

