Helena, Mont., Jan 4, 2010 / 02:56 pm (CNA).- In its final decision of 2009, the Supreme Court of Montana denied victory to pro-euthanasia group “Compassion & Choices” on its quest for a right to “aid in dying” based on the Montana State Constitution.

In a split decision issued on December 31, the Supreme Court rejected the existence of a right to physician-assisted suicide and focused on issues of statutory construction to determine that Montana state law has no public policy against “aid in dying” because the final death causing act lies in the patient's hands, explained the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

In reaction, the EPC said in their statement that “the bright spot in the decision is that it does not give physicians the ‘right’ to prescribe a lethal dose, but only suggests that circumstances may exist to give them a defense to prosecution for homicide.”

Nevertheless, according to EPC, the decision “ignores the practical realities of ensuring patient safety from over-eager heirs, new ‘best friends’ and others who might benefit from the patient's death. For example, physicians who malpractice and who want to hide their mistakes can now say: ‘It was what the patient wanted.’ The evidence against the physician dies with the patient. If the patient has no family or other advocate, who will know?”

Eileen Geller, hospice RN and president of True Compassion Advocates, stated in a press release that “in practice, this means that while assisted suicide is still not legal in Montana, the Court has nevertheless stripped vulnerable patients of important legal protections. The ruling is a recipe for elder abuse and for the victimization of ill people.”

According to Geller, “the Montana Supreme Court expressly declined to hold that a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide exists under the Montana constitution. The Montana legislature must now step up to the plate, re-affirm over a hundred years of Montana public policy, and protect elderly, ill, and Montanans with disabilities.”

06:31 am | W. Virginia ads confuse laity about bishops’ opposition to health care bill

03:18 am | Facing massive deficit, NJ governor proposes cutting Planned Parenthood from budget

01:06 am | Chinese Catholics to have ‘great celebration’ for Feast of St. Joseph

11:34 pm | Confirmation of lesbian as Episcopal bishop causes regret in Canterbury

10:02 pm | Objectors to required Spanish course take case to EU Court

British couple chooses to cut life support for child

Euthanasia of any kind unacceptable, say Portuguese bishops

Duke of Luxembourg awarded for fighting euthanasia

Canadian bishops urge opposition to radical assisted suicide bill