Obama needs to address his ‘abortion problem,’ Jesuit professor says
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Fr. John Kavanaugh

.- St. Louis University philosophy professor Father John F. Kavanaugh, S.J., writing in an open letter in the August 18 edition of the Jesuit weekly “America”, has called on presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama to address his “abortion problem” among Catholic voters.

Decrying what he called “a vociferous cadre in the Democratic Party” which has “for too long wielded a dogmatic veto over any discussion of limiting abortions,” Father Kavanaugh argued Obama can appeal to undecided Catholic voters by supporting programs that will reduce the numbers of abortions, giving a place to pro-life Democrats at the Democratic National Convention, and engaging the “arguments and evidence” offered by abortion opponents.

While asserting that Catholic voters do not “think monolithically,” Father Kavanaugh noted that there has been up to a 15 percent rise in Catholics voting Republican in recent U.S. elections. The Jesuit priest wrote to Obama that while some Catholics will vote for him because of anti-Republican sentiment or because Obama’s political agenda appeals to them, some will vote for him “not because of your position on abortion, but despite it.”

In Father Kavanaugh’s view, many Catholics realize that Obama’s approach to “wars of choice, capital punishment, hunger, homelessness, health care and refugees” might better serve “‘the least’ of our brothers and sisters.”

Father Kavanaugh acknowledged that some Catholics will never vote for a Democrat, but emphasized that there is another group trending away from Obama “because they think you not only defend partial-birth abortion but also are against lifesaving therapy for newborns surviving an abortion attempt.”

Saying Obama’s attempts to explain his stand on partial birth abortion and treatments for abortion survivors “seemed evasive,” Father Kavanaugh asked: “Can you just simply affirm your conviction that any newborn, even after an abortion attempt, should be given effective life-sustaining treatment?”

Father Kavanaugh recommended Obama engage in outreach to Democrats for Life of America and Feminists for Life, support Rev. Jim Wallis’ “abortion-reducing agenda,” and engage pro-life arguments.

“You may find that the position of most American men and women is quite different from Naral’s,” he said, advising Obama to press Sen. John McCain and his supporters on the apparent inconsistency of the Republican presidential candidate’s support for embryonic stem cell research.

He concluded his essay in “America” with a rhetorical question: “With your commitment to reasoned, evidence-based and respectful discourse, are you able to challenge your party to welcome pro-life Catholics into its supposed big tent?”

Democrats for Life Reaction

Kristen Day, director of Democrats for Life of America (DFLA), spoke with CNA in a Tuesday interview about the Obama campaign’s treatment of pro-life Democrats.

Though Day said the Obama campaign has not contacted DFLA specifically in relation to Father Kavanaugh’s essay, the campaign is “definitely trying to do outreach to pro-life voters.”

“I think since 2004 we’ve really been talking to the Democratic leadership about the importance of trying to expand the ‘big tent’ of the Democratic Party,” she explained.

“There will be a place for pro-life Democrats at the Democratic convention as well,” Day said.

Referring to reports that pro-life Democrat Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania is being considered for a speaking slot at the convention to be held in Denver later this month, Day said DFLA would be “thrilled” to see Casey speak about pro-life issues.

While it has not been reported that Casey’s hypothetical convention speech would address abortion, Day said “I can’t see him getting up there and not talking about being pro-life. It just wouldn’t make much sense for him to speak.”

“Casey symbolizes the pro-life cause; his name is associated with the issue. That would be the whole point of having him speak.”

Day added that the DFLA will be at the Democratic National Convention to host a Hall of Fame reception for pro-life Democrats and a town hall meeting on abortion reduction.

She said that DFLA has worked with the Democratic platform committee to include pro-life issues, especially in pursuit of her organization’s “95/10” campaign which aspires to reduce the U.S. abortion rate by 95 percent in ten years.

While confirming that the proposed 2008 Democratic Party Platform has dropped the word “rare” from its stand that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare,” Day said two more paragraphs were added discussing the prevention of abortion and the need to support pregnant women.

“We need to provide more support and options for women to carry to term, instead of treating abortion as only option,” Day stated, adding that DFLA is “strongly and unequivocally” pro-life in its support for candidates and policies.

Feminists for Life Reaction

President of Feminists for Life Serrin M. Foster also spoke with CNA on Tuesday, noting that Feminists for Life (FFL) is non-partisan, but also a “very unique group.”

She said that to her knowledge FFL had not been contacted by the Obama campaign in reaction to Father Kavanaugh’s letter. However, she said, she understood why Father Kavanaugh listed Feminists for Life as an organization each candidate could work with.

“Our role is very specific. We are here to help systematically eliminate the reasons that drive women to abortion. We’ll talk to anybody who has been elected to this office to further this goal.” 
Foster asked both candidates to convene a “national summit” on pregnancy and parenting, “not to have war between NARAL and National Right to Life, but to listen to stories of women who felt they had no choice but abortion, to hear stories of parents who struggle in the workplace and at home and at school trying to make it for themselves and their kids, to listen to birth mothers of adopted children.”

“Women don’t want another 35 years of this. Abortion is a reflection that we have not met the needs of women. Women have ‘settled for less’,” Foster argued.

She also invited both presumptive presidential nominees to listen to FFL speaker Melissa Ohden, who survived an abortion about five months after her conception.

Foster listed many examples of what she called “pro-woman, pro-life legislation” supported by FFL, including the Violence Against Women Act, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

She then asked both Obama and McCain to support the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Students Act, which she said would help fulfill the “unmet need of pregnant and parenting students in college” and address the reasons and fears which drive women in college to choose abortion.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Terry
Dearborn, MI 08/25/2008 07:07 PM EST
Bob Casey has a pretty good record with NARAL/Pro-Choice Amerika: 65%
How is this being "pro-life."
Published by: Dan Flatley
Canton MA 08/25/2008 06:18 AM EST
I hope Rick Santorum runs and beats Bob Casey next time around. Casey is just a tool for the pagan socialists who call themselves "Democrats", like Obama. How will Casey vote on the radical judges Obama would be nominating? As for the Jesuits, look at BC's post-Christian Theology Department. Its a mess. Their Religion and Public Policy Professor is an admitted agnostic Jew who's only "theology" comes straight from DNC headquarters. There are some great Jesuits at our colleges and universities, but far too many are dissidents hostile to the Church's orthodoxy on important moral issues facing this country. The Holy Father has his hands full with the Jesuits.
Dan Flatley
Published by: HenryP
Lindenhurst,IL 08/13/2008 07:37 PM EST
Father K shows that he is a Democrat before he is a Catholic. The Pope addressed the Jesuits in Rome and Father K was the type of Jesuit that he was talking about. These people who try to say they are Catholic and don't follow the Church's teachings are called heretics by Cardinal George in an article in The Catholic New World in the June 22, 2008 issue. Father K uses sophistry to mislead Catholics into believing that Catholics should even consider Obama.
Published by: Gabriel Austin
Los Alamos NM USA 08/13/2008 04:28 PM EST
Did Fr. Kavanaugh actually refer to the "great unwashed Catholics"? That would immediately tell us something about his world.
Published by: Jeff Johnson
Collegeville, Mn 08/13/2008 03:15 PM EST
We do not need Obama to explain his stance on abortion. He has been quite clear with his stance, in his votes and in his speeches. Because of this, he has an A+ rating with Planned Parenthood, Emily's List, etc.

What we need is for everyone running for office to renounce the horror of abortion.

Until this happens, we also need brave church leaders to stand against them. How envious I am of people who live in Kansas. Just today, their state's bishops stood shoulder to shoulder and announced that "voting for a candidate who embraces abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, human cloning, and same-sex marriage would be voting for evil."

Such men are in short supply. Maybe this is why John Chrysostom once said that the road to hell is paved with the skulls of many bishops.
Published by: mary
Fort Worth, Texas 08/13/2008 12:57 PM EST
There is no longer a Democratic party; Harry Truman would turn over in his grave to see what has happened to his party. It is all the old communists and socialists running it now. I used to be a Democrat, but became a Republican with Reagan. May God have mercy on us all.
Published by: Frank
Phoenix/AZ/USA 08/13/2008 11:19 AM EST
It is interesting to see how liberal elitists who call themselves Catholic are agonizing on what role they can play in the Democratic Party. That includes Jesuit FatherKavanaugh."What can we say to convince the great unwashed Catholics who believe in the teachings of the Church that they should vote the Democratic ticket?"
Don't waste your time. We fully understand where the Democratic Party stands and where it will fall.
Published by: david r sauter
fairvirew park ohio 08/13/2008 09:24 AM EST
If Senator Bob Casey is pro-life, why has he voted for birth control issues?
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa