|
|
||||||||
|
Obama’s science czar does not support coercive population control, spokesman says
![]() Science Czar John Holdren
Related articles:
.- The office of President Obama’s “science czar” John Holdren has responded to concerns Holdren co-authored a book which allegedly contained comments supporting coercive population control measures. A spokesman for the department said that Holdren disavowed such policies at his confirmation hearing. Holdren is currently Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. In 1977, he co-authored the 1,000 page book “Ecoscience” with Paul and Anne Ehrlich. The book included several descriptions of possible population control measures, including the addition of “sterilants” to the water supply to prevent human conception. One section, titled “Population Law,” cited the radical group Zero Population Growth and said “it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” “Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.” Another section discussed a “planetary regime” that might be given responsibility for “determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits.” In Tuesday e-mails to CNA, Rick Weiss, the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s Director of Strategic Communications, said the material at issue was from “a three-decade-old, three-author textbook used in colleges to teach energy policy.” He could “easily dismiss” fears that Dr. Holdren favors government control over population growth. “He made that quite clear in his confirmation hearing,” Weiss said. He then quoted a section of the confirmation transcript in which Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) asked Holdren whether he thinks “determining optimal population is a proper role of government.” “No, Senator, I do not,” was Holdren’s reply, according to Weiss and a transcript of the proceedings. In other remarks at the confirmation hearing, not cited by Weiss, Holdren told Sen. Vitter he no longer thinks it is “productive” to focus on the “optimum population” for the United States. “I don't think any of us know what the right answer is.” According to Weiss, Holdren “made clear that he did not believe in coercive means of population control” and is not an advocate for measures expressed in the book “and they are certainly not endorsed by this administration in any way.” Weiss also provided CNA with a statement from the book's other two authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich. The Ehrlichs said they had been “shocked” at what they called the “serious misrepresentation” of their and Holdren’s views. “We were not then, never have been, and are not now 'advocates' of the Draconian measures for population limitation described -- but not recommended -- in the book's 60-plus small-type pages cataloging the full spectrum of population policies that, at the time, had either been tried in some country or analyzed by some commentator.” Describing “Ecoscience” as a “textbook,” they said its descriptions can be “misrepresented as endorsement.” Coercive population control measures, including forced sterilizations and abortions, have been used in China’s one-child policy. In Peru in the 1990s, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the United Nations Population Fund provided support for what became an involuntary sterilization program which victimized an estimated 300,000 women. Subscriber comments:
Published by: Frank
Godfrey 12/04/2009 07:54 PM EST
Well 44% of the voting public put this criminal in office. No wonder he is putting these lunatics in his corner. I for one am against everything this charlitan has put into play. Get him out. A study of history will show what the world. I"ve got to go on a date with my wife. So you guys go figure this out. You put him in office.
Published by: Mike
Portland Oregon 10/20/2009 12:20 PM EST
I cannot believe that no one seems to be aware that the population of humans on earth is having a huge negative impact on everything. In 50 years the planet will be so overpopulated by humans that we may cause irreversable damage to the planet. when anyone says the most mildest sugestion of controling the population people get all bent out of shape. Infact the reason we are not over 10 billion people strong right now is due to world war two. Imagine the poverty and starvation of a world with 10 billion people. If we really want to get searious about population control we would implement some radical policies:
1)All prisoners sentenced to violent crimes sould be imediately executed.
2)All treatment for terminal illnesses, other than the relief of pain or assisted death, should be banned, ending the prolonged life and cost of care.
3)Every human should be reversably starleized, the reversal of the starlization should be only allowed if the issuance of birth licences are restricted to those people who have passed several competancy test demonstrating their ability to provide for, raise and care for a healthy adult child.
4)All laws that promote safety over responsibility, such as seatbelts in cars, should be imediately revoked.
5)China should go to war with India.
6)Nuclear weapons should be exausted on overpopulated areas irregardless of location.
My point is that unless we get over our bleeding hearts for each other we will wind up causing more harm than good
Published by: lunchboxgurl
stephevnille/tx/usa 08/24/2009 09:41 PM EST
In review of the latest comments, it appears that the concensus is quite clearly describing the tactics that BO has so successfully studied and practiced under Saul Alinsky in telling the people whatever it takes to gain control and power even if it is not the truth nor what you practice or believe. Google Rules for Radicals and study its teachings.
Published by: theoriste
boston ma 08/09/2009 06:35 PM EST
@ geronimo
none 07/15/2009 10:13 PM EST "It is not a commonly known fact, since most people have no idea what the Roe v. Wade decision actually says, that forced abortion is permitted under by Roe v. Wade. Here is the pertinent quote: "For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician." There you have it folks. Nothing about "woman's choice", but only the "medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician". OMG, so WRONG. This is the actual quote from the decision. Note 'in consultation with the patient!" Where do you get your lies? "This means, on the other hand, that, for the period of pregnancy prior to this "compelling" point, the attending physician, in consultation with his patient, is free to determine, without regulation by the State, that, in his medical judgment, the patient's pregnancy should be terminated. If that decision is reached, the judgment may be effectuated by an abortion free of interference by the State."
Published by: msg
USA 08/08/2009 07:29 PM EST
Population control? Are they crazy? Do you have any idea how many generations it will take to pay for BO's lunacy if we breed s-l-o-w-l-y?
Published by: Awakened Patriot
Midwest, USA 08/07/2009 11:32 AM EST
Holdren, like Sotomayor, simply displayed "Confirmation Conscience" during the hearings. Does anyone really think a man who would kill toddlers cares about telling the truth?
Published by: Paula
Burrell 07/20/2009 06:19 PM EST
Did anyone notice, during the election, every time John McCain said something that resonated with the voters the next day Obama would be embracing that very same position. He tells you what you want to hear and then does what fits into his sick agenda.
Published by: Linda
New Mexico 07/19/2009 12:57 PM EST
In 1963 there was entered and archived in the congressional records a listing of Communist Goals. Google it! One of the goals was to infiltrate and take over one or both political parties. Democrats are totally Marxist/Progressive/Socialist at various degrees and many Republicans (moderates like McCain and Powell have succumbed to the progressive agenda. Another of the goals was population control. We need to get rid of progressives and take back the Republican party to the core ideals of Reagan.
Tell me why abortion is 60% Black women and liberals are supposed to be "compassionate"? Don't believe it. They have enslaved a welfare mentality of entitlement that will vote in big government.
Published by: James
Burnsville/MN/US 07/18/2009 10:08 AM EST
If they felt Holdren was wrong about his alarmism and prescriptions, they wouldn't have made him science czar because he'd have no credentials. Holdren's "credentials" aren't based on anything else but that.
Published by: susan piercy
conyers ga usa 07/17/2009 05:41 PM EST
Confirmation hearings of czars??? When & where? How did I miss that. I thought it was idealogical cronyism and they just showed up.
Published by: Will Young
Timonium,MarylandUSA 07/17/2009 09:13 AM EST
It is said of Obama, "Don't listen to what he says, but pay attention to what he does." I think that holds true for his whole administration. They will say anything to gain the power, then do what ever they wish when they get there.
Published by: john
ny 07/16/2009 08:31 PM EST
This Government really is scarey listen to Obama spout like a demi god and remember he choose this guy so what has Obama in store for us and the world.?
Published by: geronimo
none 07/15/2009 10:13 PM EST
It is not a commonly known fact, since most people have no idea what the Roe v. Wade decision actually says, that forced abortion is permitted under by Roe v. Wade. Here is the pertinent quote:
"For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician." There you have it folks. Nothing about "woman's choice", but only the "medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician".
Published by: Robertz
KY,USA 07/15/2009 09:26 PM EST
Tax money is now being used to support forced sterilization, forced abortion, and kidnapping (to hold for ransom from the parents, and if they are not able to fork up many years worth of salary then sold into adoption or just disappearing) in China through UNPF. This was discovered by investigation led by Colin Powell who supported Obama. Now Obama opens back up funding for UNPF without even mentioning a word about this. This stuff is still happening right now, as confirmed by LifeSiteNews.
Published by: Kay
alaska 07/15/2009 08:45 PM EST
has anyone asked themselves why so many of the advisors in the administration are called czars? The Czar was a emperor in Russia before it fell in the revolutions. As for the philosphy of Holden, how could a professor co-author a book, use it to teach in the university, then state that the ideas were not promoted by the author, and were taken out of context? Sure sounds like the Marxist dilectic to me. God help us
Published by: Tell The Truth
Abrahams Bosom 07/15/2009 08:05 PM EST
Google this man and what he wrote. Understand and KNOW that a wrapper pretty words do not do away with the vile evil inside of the package.
The Georgia Guidestones point to this mans true goal. God will deal with him in the end along with all other evil ones out there.
Published by: sassygrandma
Green Bay, WI, USA 07/15/2009 04:07 PM EST
And we're supposed to believe him? And we're supposed to believe the present administration? Sounds like back peddling to me.
Published by: Dr. Angelito
West Palm 07/15/2009 01:39 PM EST
Wow, looks like the CNA has been infiltrated by the Eugenicists, how else could you explain this poorly veiled attempt to spin this articles name, and the article itself, including no links to Holdren's genocidal screeds that are publicly available on the internet, amazon, and other google books.
Shame on you infiltrators.
Published by: louise
oakville, ct usa 07/15/2009 01:22 PM EST
I had no idea that U.S. monies were being used for "what became an involuntary sterilization program which victimized an estimated 300,00 women". Is there a way for us to find out where our taxes go in these regards?
Published by: diane smith
Northern California, USA 07/15/2009 12:15 PM EST
Population control is the object of BO's desire so why is one more czar who supports his evil ideas a surprise?
It appears that every one of his govt. thugs has no compunction about carrying out the death theme he embraces, not only for the U.S. but for the world.
Published by: Maureen
NY, USA 07/15/2009 11:29 AM EST
Please. Does anyone really believe that the party that obsessively forwards the culture of death doesn't have this on their agenda? 'Health care' will surely usher in euthanasia. I said years ago that the BABY BOOMERS WOULD BECOME THE NEXT 'CHOICE.' The future, under leaders with absolutely no moral compass, just may make the Nazis blush unless the Father delivers us from their evils...
Published by: joe
chicago 07/15/2009 11:22 AM EST
Notice how this story isn't getting ANY play in any mainstream news sources?
You'd think somebody besides Catholic News Agency and conspiracy blogs would cover this story....
Published by: Margo
Mount Vernon, WA, USA 07/15/2009 10:58 AM EST
Yeah, right.... This guy is a loon, but I'm really not surprised by the current administration's propensity toward loonacy in government positions.
Published by: Laurie
Canada 07/15/2009 09:11 AM EST
The guy is a chameleon.
He will say whatever gets him into a power position. He is a true liberal. ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages. ADVERTISING |
Latest news:
03:07 pm | Spouse of Costa Rican presidential candidate 'pockets' Eucharist 02:15 pm | Vatican responds to widely divergent reports on Boffo resignation 12:56 pm | Venezuelan cardinal calls for new evangelization of country's capital 11:11 am | International congress to focus on priestly identity and celibacy 07:10 am | Former Saints star says Super Bowl victory revealed a ‘team with destiny’ Related news :
Obama nominates rural Catholic doctor as Surgeon General K of C head surveys 'common ground' for U.S.-Catholic relations Get CNA News on your email:
Resources
|
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here |
||||||
|
||||||||

