Pharmaceutical company cites Vatican document to defend its use of aborted baby
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- A pro-life group is criticizing pharmaceutical company Neocutis’ defense of its use of cells harvested from an aborted fetus in the development of burn treatments and anti-aging creams. While the company said it takes seriously concerns about the dignity of human life—going so far as to cite a Vatican document—the pro-life group is questioning Neocutis’ version of the facts.

Last week the organization Children of God for Life released a statement criticizing Neocutis’ use of cells harvested from an aborted fetus in the development of anti-aging creams. The group also called for a boycott.

The “Processed Skin Proteins" (PSPs) being used in Neocutis' burn and wound treatments were reportedly taken from an electively-aborted 14-week-old male fetus donated by the University Hospital of Lausanne in Switzerland.

The baby’s cells were used to create a working cell bank by laboratory cultivation. The cells now number in the hundreds of millions.

Though the University Hospital of Lausanne said the cells were originally established for wound healing and burn treatments, Children of God for Life charged that they are now being used for cosmetic products.

Neocutis defended its procedures in a recent statement which professed respect for differing views. It said the important question is how to conduct research and development in a way that is “respectful of the dignity of human life, and that is conducted in a highly controlled and responsible manner.”

“This is an understandable concern that we take very seriously,” Neocutis said. “The small skin donation that, ultimately, made the development of our treatment possible originated from a single terminated pregnancy that could not survive to term and was deemed medically necessary by the attending physicians.”

According to the company, the “voluntary donation to medical research” was made by the parents and was performed in adherence with “strict Swiss laws.”

“To be clear, our products do not directly use the originally donated tissue in any way,” the company added. The cells used were not embryonic stem cells, it reported, saying that no other donation will ever be necessary and that the cell bank enables the production of about 900 million biological bandages for patients with severe wounds, burns and other serious skin conditions.

The company said it believed “extremely limited use” of fetal skin tissue obtained in a respectful manner can lead to “significant medical benefit.”

In a Nov. 3 statement, Children of God for Life Executive Director Debi Vinnedge charged that the company was “not being honest.” The group cited evidence that the company was using fetal cells since 1995, long before the 2004 abortion used to provide fetal material.

The organization also questioned Neocutis’ claims, made in other responses to public inquiries, that the abortion was performed on a pregnancy that could not come to term in which the mother’s life was in danger. These facts were not documented in a 2009 research paper published in Experimental Gerontology, the pro-life group says.

Vinnedge criticized as “unconscionable” other comments by Neocutis President Mark Lemcko that he had “felt comfortable with his decision” after studying a 2005 document by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life.

In Vinnedge’s view that document, “Moral Reflection on Vaccines Prepared From Cells Derived from Aborted Human Fetuses,” allowed the use of fetus-derived treatments only in temporary situations of “grave inconvenience” or “considerable danger” to the health of children and would not apply to cosmetics.

The issue is one of “health versus pure vanity,” Vinnedge insisted.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Maryanne Linkes
Pittsburgh 11/04/2009 10:13 PM EST
There is no right way to do the wrong thing and this is wrong. There is no justification. I would like to hear them give this excuse to Jesus when they meet Him upon their death. If they are really misguided, we must pray for them.
Published by: Gail
Greencastle, PA, USA 11/04/2009 09:36 PM EST
Ronald Reagan said, "I have noticed everyone who is for abortion has been born." Would the man who thinks it's helpful to science be willing to offer his own body for science while he is yet still alive? This baby had no choice about the matter & was killed. Somehow, progress in science & the needs of burn victims would not be so important if the cells had to be harvested by killing a live adult man! At least, the man could speak up for his own life. Pity the poor, helpless, innocent babies. God said, “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you.” “Whatsoever you do to the least of My brethren, that you do unto Me,” said the Lord.
Published by: jim
austin, TX 11/04/2009 07:18 PM EST
He did say we can eat the fruit of the tree, just don't touch it. Yeah, that what he said alright. We all agree right?
Published by: Therese
California 11/04/2009 03:02 PM EST
First pro-abortionists approve of tearing a child apart in the womb; or burning or drowning it to death by saline injection; or birthing it halfway, sticking a pair of surgical scissors in the back of its neck and sucking the brains out with a vacuum. Then they cannabalize the child by using it parts for stem-cell research for other people when there are other more ethical and effective ways of doing the research--skin, adult and umbilical stem-cell research. Hitler and Joseph Mengele would be proud of all the people involved is this.
Published by: Ron Giles
Valrico, Fl 11/04/2009 02:35 PM EST
Morale ideology vs scientific applications debates will always continue. I agree that pprocedures for using cadeavers, fetuses, stem cells, etc need to be monitored. But do we really know how God stands on any issue or are we second guessing and applying our beliefs based on our feelings. Unfortunately the Bible does not provide exact guidance on how these issues are to be dealt with. We know that any scientific application that would aid in the recovery of burn victims, make life more meaningful and instill hope cannot be morally wrong. And if any other "treatment" can arise from those procedures does that make it immoral? Don't get me wrong. If a profit can be made by selling creams made by cells for reasons of vanity, etc then does this go beyond the original purpose of the experiment? But if selling the creams etc will lead to other medical benefits then why not?
Published by: Michele Bondi Bottesi
Rochester Hills/MI/USA 11/04/2009 02:33 PM EST
In this case of using the cells of an aborted baby for any reason, we are reminded that we must never sin against God with the hope that good comes of it. God commanded us "Thou shalt not kill." We must continue to pray for ourselves and for each other, that each individual has the courage and strength to choose actions that give Glory to God and respect the dignity of what He has created. When the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees,they gathered together, and one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” He said to him, “ ’You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” -Matthew 22:34-40 God is at work, in each one of us.
Published by: john faris
lathrup michigan 11/04/2009 02:26 PM EST
perfect example of how you can see the tail of the devil in what is presented as being good!!
Published by: Lou
Sanford, NC USA 11/04/2009 10:11 AM EST
Dear Brothers @ Neocutis; The immorality of using "death of a human in the embryo stage" is not acceptable as useful to work for the living in any way! RePent of this error in interpretation of doctrinal writings. LJA/JMJ
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa