U.S. Bishops’ pro-life office corrects ‘misleading’ FOCA novena message
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

Tom Grenchik / President-elect Barack Obama

.- Officials at the Pro-life Secretariat of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) have issued statements seeking to correct “misleading” information provided in a widely-circulated announcement for a novena to stop FOCA.

The officials insisted that the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) would not pass immediately after President-elect Obama takes office, but they reaffirmed that the possible coercion of pro-life medical institutions and changes to abortion funding restrictions are real concerns.

The novena announcement in question, which did not originate with the USCCB, asks Catholics to pray to stop FOCA, legislation designed to protect abortion rights even if the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade is overturned. The novena was to start on January 11.

One variant of the novena announcement begins by warning “If you are opposed to abortion then there is bad news on the horizon.”

Information with this novena announcement claims that FOCA is “set to be signed if Congress passes it on January 21-22 of 2009.” It claims that all hospitals, including Catholic hospitals, will be forced by FOCA to perform abortions on request.

The novena announcement says informed consent laws and parental notification laws will be eliminated and claims that partial birth abortions will be legalized. Further, it warns that all U.S. taxpayers will be funding abortions if FOCA passes.

The anonymous novena announcement writer then speculates:

“Perhaps most importantly the government will now have control in the issue of abortion. This could result in a future amendment that would force women by law to have abortions in certain situations (rape, Down syndrome babies, etc) and could even regulate how many children women are allowed to have.”

In a Friday email to those with questions about the novena, Richard Doerflinger, Associate Director of the USCCB’s Secretariat of Pro-life Activities, stated “this novena item is misleading in any number of ways.”

“Of course there is no possibility of FOCA being passed this month,” he stated. He also denied a rumor that, upon taking office, President-elect Obama could enact FOCA simply by executive order.

“There may or may not be presidential orders in the first few days of the Administration to reverse President Bush's policies on stem cell research” and the Mexico City Policy, which forbids funding for international organizations which perform or promote abortions.

“We are fairly sure that our opponents will try for various less ambitious efforts before they try for FOCA, including possible attacks on some of the pro-life riders contained in appropriations bills that must be renewed by the first week of March,” Doerflinger explained, noting that the Prevention First Act which mandates contraception coverage is of concern to the Secretariat.

He said a postcard produced for pro-lifers by the Secretariat emphasizes that FOCA is one of many threats. The postcard urges Congress to oppose FOCA, “any similar measure, AND to retain current policies that prevent government funding and promotion of abortion.”

Doerflinger did warn that if abortion rights advocates succeed in lesser efforts, such as overturning the Hyde Amendment or a similar “longstanding funding rider” prohibiting abortion funding, “they will probably be emboldened to go for bigger goals.”

The novena announcement’s contention that women could be forced to undergo abortions, Doerflinger said, is “very strange.” He said such laws would “presumably” be unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade.

“But even FOCA itself is expressed throughout in terms of the woman's freedom of choice over pregnancy, birth and abortion, so such a pro-coercion amendment would have to say the exact opposite of what the text of the bill now says.”

However, he added, coercion of pro-life health care providers under FOCA is “indeed a legitimate and grave concern.”

“FOCA itself would not directly force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, but could be used to invalidate the laws that currently prevent others (including governmental bodies) from exerting such pressure,” Doerflinger explained.

FOCA’s provision that government may not “discriminate” against the exercise of the abortion right in providing public benefits, information and services, he added, “seems to insist that all health programs that involve women of childbearing age must cover abortion to the same extent that they cover childbirth.”

“That mandate would be used to nullify or undermine conscience clauses within those programs, to create new ‘basic benefits’ mandates that pro-life providers cannot provide in good conscience.”

“The effect would be to push Catholic and other pro-life providers increasingly out of public health programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, etc., making it impossible for them to survive.”

“We have to remember that FOCA is a very unusual kind of statute.  It does not require or prohibit actions on the part of private individuals.  It is a law about what kinds of laws you are allowed to have.  It is a statute written to do the kind of thing that Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Constitution ordinarily do -- but it is even more extreme than the Supreme Court's own decisions,” Doerflinger wrote.

“In that sense, it is indeed a power grab on the part of Congress, telling all 50 states what laws they are not allowed to enact,” Doerflinger argued.

“But we also need to be careful that we don't make charges we can't back up.  FOCA is radical enough to be frightening without doing that!”

Tom Grenchik, Executive Director of the USCCB’s Secretariat of Pro-life Activities, also sent a Friday e-mail to the diocesan Pro-Life Directors and Catholic conferences of U.S. states asking that they correct the false information conveyed in the novena announcement should they come across it.

Grenchik further noted the prayer resources on the Pro-life Secretariat web site at http://www.usccb.org/prolife/liturgy/index.shtml , explaining that January 22 shall be observed as “a particular day of penance for violations to the dignity of the human person committed through acts of abortion, and of prayer for the full restoration of the legal guarantee of the right to life.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: James Klett
Augusta/GA/USA 02/01/2009 01:50 PM EST
I've told many that there are many aspects at stake with this Act; Moral, legal and financial. The moral and legal aspects have been well-discussed. Catholic hospitals (25-35%?) are being threatened to shut down and individual caregivers (nurses and doctors) are telling me that they get out of healthcare due to moral concerns if forced to practice abortions. If the supply of heathcare services drop by 30%, guess what will happen to the already high price of heathcare?

Government medicine, here we come.
Published by: Josh
Poultney, VT USA 02/01/2009 08:25 AM EST
Re-read the article. Educate yourselves better and focus on the broader Catholic Social Teaching of the Church. If you build it, they will come, as they say. Peace
Published by: kenny
boston, ma 01/30/2009 07:41 PM EST
Rate: Good
As a non-catholic, I'm always surprised to read through catholic literature. What mystifies me is not the pro-life position, which as a moral stance requires no religious primer; no, I find the expression of the belief perplexing.

I understand that the issue is life and death. What I don't understand is the insulated occultism that seems the predominant mode laity choose to voice their moral certitude. Instead of well-reasoned, well-informed civil activity and discourse, I see an unattractive fervor.

Please don't think I'm attempting an anonymous insult from the outside. What I mean is this: I am not Catholic, along with the majority of the US. I understand the importance of Catholic identity to (at least conservative) Catholics. And I understand that the issue of abortion--and the protest against FOCA--is bound up in a meaningful way with that identity.

But if Catholics are interested in shaping US politics, they need to extend a hand. They can't do this alone. Literally. Shoot, nearly half of self-identified Catholic registered voters were leaning Obama according to Pew in late Oct.

The argument enjoys great merit. I am not saying deny your religious heritage; I am suggesting that individuals separate their desire to convert the world and their desire to see a world without abortion. I am happy to listen to the latter, and would politely reject the former. But I wouldn't lift a finger if I felt that I was being manipulated into a religious movement...
Published by: godslilsprite
jusa 01/22/2009 08:21 AM EST
Rate: Very Good
We as Catholics believe in miracles, we witness a miracle every Sunday at mass. We must not forget the impact that our prayer has on the world. It is time to use our love and our words, as directed by praying of the rosary, and write to our new President. Not an email, but a hand written letter from the heart. Not being angry but explaining to him in our own way WHY abortion is wrong. We as Catholics must believe that if we try with the Blessed Mother, we can convert hearts.
Published by: DAVID KOZAK
United States 01/21/2009 04:30 PM EST
Misunderstanding the FOCA law will do NO SERVICE to the pro-life cause!
Read the excellent article more carefully and you will see that many misguided zealots are clueless and are putting words into our new President's mouth.
OBEY OUR BISHOPS NOT FANATICS!
Published by: Sam
Arizona 01/20/2009 08:04 PM EST
can someone please tell me where it said that the USCCB said praying the novena was bad? All they said was that the information in the e-mail was not completely accurate not that the novena itself is bad.
Published by: Marilee
usa 01/17/2009 06:05 PM EST
Rate: Regular
Too Bad for Catholics who voted and supported OBAMA. They were told of Obama's agenda, principles and yet they (Catholics) voted for him because of MONEY. WELL CATHOLICS, where exactly is this MONEY that you so much supported???? THERE ISN'T ANY ????? GOOD LUCK AMERICA!!!!
Published by: Geremia
United States 01/16/2009 01:30 PM EST
William P. Murphy, there have been studies on the economic effects of abortion, including:

• "The Cost of Abortion" by the economist Lawrence F. Roberge

• "The Abortion Bomb" by Dennis Howard

• About 32 minutes into "The Cost of Abortion" documentary begins the segment on the economic effects of abortion.
Published by: Frank M. Rega
Millsboro, DE, USA 01/15/2009 12:56 PM EST
I did not start this email Novena, but some of its contents is almost a direct quote from an article I wrote in which I show that it would be very easy to amend FOCA, should it be passed,in order to limit the number of children a mother can have. This is what my article says: "Thus the FOCA clause in section 4.b.1.a, stating that a woman has the “right to choose to bear a child” could conveniently and easily be changed to, for example, that a woman has the right to choose to bear up to two children. More ominously, it could be amended to state that a woman has the right to bear a child, except in cases of rape, incest, Down syndrome, etc."
Published by: Thomas Reynolds
Hopewell Jct., NY, USA 01/15/2009 10:56 AM EST
The ideaof "forced abortions" may not ne on the immediate horizon but it is not a "very strange" concept. Consider 1950: legalized abortion was then considered unthinkable!
Published by: Chris Cassleman
Spring Lake MI USA 01/15/2009 08:33 AM EST
My son is in med school for US Air Force-this law will invlidate all DOD freedom of conscience-He will have to leave medicine - wake up USCCB-The proaborts are taking theinitiative just like 1973 -will we hear"Howdidthishappen?"again.
Published by: Deacon Nicholas A. Mazzei
Yonkers,N.Y. U.S.A. 01/15/2009 06:53 AM EST
Rate: Very Good
With a liberal congress and a liberal Pres. how long do you think it will take for FOCA to become the law of the land? I believe it is time for our shepards to maintain as much pressur on our legilators and constantly preach to the flock that you cannot be both Catholic abd pro abortion. If you loose some of the sheep because of preaching God's word it means you never had them. Preach the word of God and stick to your guns and trust the Holy Spirit to change the hearts of the flock.
Published by: Geremia
United States 01/15/2009 06:28 AM EST
Pray for our bishops and Richard Doerflinger, too! How is so sure that "there is no possibility of FOCA being passed this month" or that it is "very strange" "that women could be forced to undergo abortions"? His statements are misleading, not the FOCA novena email!
Published by: Gabriel
NY 01/15/2009 06:16 AM EST
Once again we find church bureaucrats attempting to water down the danger in order to make the Catholic position more palatable to the enemy.

Truly disgusting.
Published by: James
Gering, NE 01/14/2009 10:25 PM EST
There you have it. The USCCB had weighed in and all will be well. Garbage! FOCA says what it says and all the wishing Grenchik and the USCCB do won't change that. Know that FOCA will do what Planned Parenthood couldn't...complete unrestricted abortion at any time of the pregnancy, forcing Catholic hospitals to perform them. On its own, the USCCB hasn't gotten anything right so far, why should we listen this drivel? PRAY THE NOVENA!
Published by: Julie Imbelloni
St.George,Utah, United States of America 01/14/2009 08:31 PM EST
I've had it with congress. They WORK FOR US,it's not the other way around. But, the liars keep getting voted back in and they get more evil each year. When will we do something about them?
Published by: William Monti
New York/United States 01/14/2009 07:00 PM EST
This is the typical tripe the USCCB puts out in order to be at arms length when they go begging for crumbs (money) for their social agenda and liberation theology mission.

Their silence has brought us to this point when all the abortionists are in command.

Pelosi/Biden/Durbin/Kennedy/Kerry and all the "Catholics" that support abortion with an unquenchable thirst to assure their election each and every time.

They (the Bishops aand Cardinals) need to listen to the Pope when he said to the EU that abortion is a non-starter.
Published by: GS Gerace
Austin, TX USA 01/14/2009 05:55 PM EST
This is at least third time the USCCB has had to retract/modify a previously published statement. I propose letting the DIOCESAN BISHOPS THEMSELVES do the teaching, not the staff of the USCCB. After all, they are the only ones who have the authority from Christ to teach, not a group of conference delegates, without supervision, apparently. The fact that the USCCB gave millions to ACORN last year, makes me loath to contribute to any fund raisers this year.
Published by: Andrew
North Carolina, US 01/14/2009 05:16 PM EST
I can't believe what I'm reading. Now is not the time for pro-lifers to back down. The text of FOCA makes it very clear that abortion services MUST be provided without exception and yes, that does mean that Catholic hospitals will be required to perform abortions if they want to stay in business. FOCA's text also makes it clear that this federal bill/law will trump all state restrictions. We need to pray for Obama's conversion but that does not mean that we need to sit back and hope that FOCA does not get passed by Congress. No, we must take action and call, email and write our Congressmen TODAY and urge them to oppose the FOCA. FOCA has to pass Congress before Obama can sign it into law: let's not give him that chance. Come on bishops, priests and other Catholic religious: show leadership. It's a national disgrace that over 50 percent of Catholics voted for the most pro-abortion candidate ever to run for the presidency.
Published by: John
Hayward, WI US 01/14/2009 04:59 PM EST
It is too bad that the USCCB is not so meticulous about correcting things that originate with them, ie movie reviews giving favorable ratings to assorted slime, etc... At any rate, it is unlikely that Catholics will be harmed by praying out in front of the thoughts expressed in the e-mail rather than waiting for the proverbial poop to hit the fan. Once FOCA or other like things are enacted prayers might not be as productive. Look at Roe, the bishops stood by mute for decades while the climate became right for it. Was anything gained by the muteness? Now we have it and will it go away? Have our prayers been effective? God only knows and only He judges when and how to answer. It is our job to communicate with Him and ask for His deliverance from evil whether it be anticipated or currently at work upon us!
Published by: Gabriel Austin
Los Alamos NM USA 01/14/2009 04:14 PM EST
That the novena is criticized by a bureaucrat from the USCCB office tells us much about that organization and who is running it. Surely it is up to each bishop to run his own diocese.
Published by: carolyn
fresno, ca 01/14/2009 03:57 PM EST
Thank you.
We need to be very CLEAR.
We also need to make absolutely certain that all continue to be aware of the Catholic Church teaching regarding abortion, and the beginning of life - from the moment of conception.

Some of the seriousness of abortion appears to NOT to have been completely addressed and explained for the majority of Catholic Church populace. Many Catholics seem to have little understanding of the moral and ethical principles regarding Abortion and the Right to Life. Other Catholics appear to consider Paul VI's Encyclical to be "old fashioned". It may also be true that, many believe that it is utterly "old fashioned" to obey the Holy Father.
Published by: Mary
River Forest, IL USA 01/14/2009 02:59 PM EST
I received the above mentioned email, passed it on and am participating in the novena. Whether or not there is a misleading comment in the email is of little concern to me. The most important thing is that the FOCA is a very bad piece of legislation and should be defeated.
Published by: Deborah Duggan
Oakland CA 01/14/2009 01:00 PM EST
It is very disappointing to note that groups who purport to represent the American Catholic hierarchy (but do not) and the clergy, such as "Priests for Life," continue, overtly, to follow the divisive game plan of Karl Rove, claim that Democrats (who just elected numerous pro-lifers to Congress) are necessarily and categorically the "party of death." The Bishops apparently, if we believe the statistics put out by these groups have their pastoral obligations cut out for them in using moral persuasion to work with the women in their own diocese. The concerns about Catholic health care institutions should be focused currently on how to reduce the infant mortality (which puts the U.S. on a par with third world countries)caused by inaccessible pre-natal and post-natal health care. Catholics who voted for Obama see hope not dire consequences for a real change in the Republican policies and politics of the past decade. FOCA has been around for 30 years, NARAL isn't interested in re-tooling it.
Published by: Jacob
LA, California, USA 01/14/2009 12:48 PM EST
I was utterly baffled by this journalist's attempt to legitimize "abortion rights advocates" and the implicit criticism of a Catholic hospital boycott (justified by the Hippocratic Oath), naming it "coercion."

What kind of Catholic publication is this?
Published by: Mrs.Jayne S. Teague
Sugarcreek, OH, USA 01/14/2009 12:48 PM EST
How can an Novena hurt!!!!????????????
You should see the number of young people on FACEBOOK, saying they are praying and fasting!!!!!Why would you even try to 'correct' this wonderful prayer to stop FOCA!! I don'r understasnd you people at the US Bishop's conference!! It's like you have no faith!!!!!!!
Published by: Jim Hill
Hardy, AR USA 01/14/2009 12:34 PM EST
If the Bishops had started the novena in the first place there would not have been the exageration so lets not confuse the issue with headlines like these. Lets start with the Bishops taking their responsible role and the headlines could read"Bishops support novena to protect life" then in the article the corrections could be made. May God have mercy on us.
Published by: Henry Drees
Albuquerque, NM 01/14/2009 12:28 PM EST
The writer of this assertion does not take the abortion issue seriously enough. Giving up the moral high ground to rumors of idle speculation is to surrender land that has been purchased with gallons of blood, sweat and tears from abortion opponents, which should rightly include All Catholics. And, in particular, from the thousands of unborn fetuses ripped from their destiny by this despicable act of inhumanity to man. More have died from abortion than from all of the wars is the last ten years.
Published by: Steven Barrett
Hadley, MA 01/14/2009 12:23 PM EST
Mr. Doerflinger said, “FOCA itself would not directly force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, but could be used to invalidate the laws that currently prevent others (including governmental bodies) from exerting such pressure.” Just this week in the US District Court in Boston, the ACLU filed a lawsuit anticipating passage of FOCA with the express intent to indeed force the Church when it comes to any activity involving any church-related agency (Catholic Charities in this case) receiving any federal funds into surrendering its protections under the First Amendment. Apparently they are no longer considered guaranteeable.

FOCA is fascism, plain and simple. This proposed legislation is intrinsically evil.
Published by: William P. Murphy
United States 01/14/2009 10:44 AM EST
I WOULD BE INTERESTED TO LEARN OF THE ECONOMIC IMAPACT THE DEATHS OF 50 MILLION BABIES HAVE HAD ON OUR ECONOMY.
COULD A STUDY POSSIBLY BE CONDUCTED?
Published by: Felicia
USA 01/14/2009 09:38 AM EST
Why are you trying so hard to downplay FOCA. Are you afraid of something? Of course this is truly evil. You need to have more holy courage & holy boldness to stand for the truth. Your article makes it sound like FOCA is no big deal!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
Latest news:
Related news :
Get CNA News on your email:
Your E-mail:
Subscribe HTML
Unsubscribe Text only
Headlines
Resources
read this
First Reading:
rss
read this
podcast
audio
Gospel:
rss
read this
podcast
audio
Saint of the Day
podcast
audio
Homily of the day
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa