Ultrasound technology and laws credited for pro-life shift
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- Some doctors and pro-life leaders now say ultrasound technology is partly responsible for Americans’ gradual shift to identifying themselves as pro-life. Nebraskan legislators are now considering joining the many states which require that a woman considering an abortion be provided an ultrasound of her baby.

A recent Gallup poll showed 51 percent of Americans now self-identify as pro-life, composing a majority for the first time. The change has led to speculation that improved ultrasound technology has helped change minds.

"Ultrasound used to be less available, very grainy. Now the baby is very clear, very distinct," Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life told Fox News.

Massachusetts Doctor Eric J. Keroack reported to Fox News that a two-year study showed 75 percent of his patients who were unsure about having an abortion decided not to after choosing to view the ultrasound images of their child.

Currently, six states require verbal counseling or written materials to include information on accessing ultrasound services. Twelve states regulate the provision of ultrasound by abortion providers.

Last week Nebraska lawmakers advanced a measure requiring abortion providers to display ultrasound images of unborn children so that patients can easily view them. On Thursday they voted 37-5 to send the measure to a second round of voting.

Nebraska state Sen. John Harm told Fox News the proposed law gives struggling women the option to view an ultrasound and “hopefully see a beating heart and the development of the child.”

"I've had correspondence with women who've gone through an abortion and who've said that if they had the option of seeing the ultrasound, they might not have made that decision," he said.

Defenders of abortion argued that the technology is being used to generate guilt among women who have abortions.

"The other side has made it pretty clear that this is a strategy to get women to change their minds," Gretchen Borchelt, senior counsel at the National Women's Law Center, told FOXNews.com.

She said her organization does not support requiring women to view ultrasound images.

Last year Oklahoma passed legislation requiring abortion providers to perform an ultrasound on every woman seeking an abortion and to place the monitor in a position easy for the woman to view.

The legislation requires doctors to provide “a simultaneous description of what the ultrasound is depicting” and describe the dimensions of the unborn child, the presence of cardiac activity, and the presence of external members and internal organs if they are present and viewable.

The bill clearly states that there will be no legal penalty for either the physician or the woman if she refuses to look at the ultrasound images.

However, the bill is being challenged by the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents abortion clinics.

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: Cindy Duis
Ft Dodge IA 05/22/2009 09:53 AM EST
This is a very encouraging article. Since we have yet to change the hearts of our lawmakers, at least the hearts of women are being changed! A recent newspaper article quoted a pro-abortion advocate as stating "It's a fetus, not a baby" Well, it looks like there's definite human body parts there! And the "fetus/baby" born alive during an abortion? Definitely a baby then. Spread the word!
Published by: Heather
Wichita, KS 05/21/2009 12:43 AM EST
I agree. Even as a passionate pro-lifer before and during my pregnancy, I was still completely overwhelmed by the sight of my 1-inch long son wiggling his tiny arms and legs! We had many ultrasounds during our pregnancy for medical reasons, and each and every time it was simply fascinating to see him.

Even for those of us who "know" what a fetus is, the truth hits home in a new way every time. I pray that every woman will be able to experience this for herself.
Published by: Cathy
Penryn, CA 05/20/2009 06:04 PM EST
Thank you for writting this article, our prayers are working. My 20 yr daughter just gave birth to healthy boy. She decided there was no way she could ever have an abortion after viewing her child's heartbeat at that first ultrasound. And the doctor still wanted to not let her see it. And tried to say it was not a heart beat. Thank you Jesus for Aiden. He is a blessing to our family.
Published by: Pat
San Diego 05/20/2009 04:07 PM EST
Guilt came long before ultrasound. If it isn't wrong, why guilt? You wouldn't feel guilt if you saw your body on ultrasound, so maybe it's really a live BABY!
Published by: Ellen
Denver, CO 05/20/2009 03:21 PM EST
It is good news that some states will be requiring abortion clinics to show the ultrasound of the babies in the womb. Most often at abortion clinics they will not even show the mother the monitor so that she will not change her mind. After all they want her money and do not care for the welfare of the woman or the baby. IT IS A MONEY MAKING BUSINESS. The clinic I work at gives free ultrasounds to abortion minded clients so that they can make an informed decision and see that it is not just a glob of tissue. I hope that all the states will require this prior to a life changing or life ending decision.
Published by: DAVID LARSEN
Scituate Mass. USA 05/20/2009 05:06 AM EST
I have done diagnostic ultrasound. I can't think of any woman planning to have her baby that didn't want an ultrasonic picture of her baby to take with her after the exam was done. Real time ultrasound is fascinating as movement is observed,the heart is beating,and the baby usually is sucking their thumb. There is no doubt that this is a life. The detail of ultrasound has just gotten a lot better with 3D images. If anyone would like to see these images they are easily available through Google on the internet.
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa