Update: SSPX rejects “signing an agreement with Rome”
This version contains extensive quotes from Fellay's letter
Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente

.- Bernard Fellay, the leader of the Society of St. Pius X, has rejected the idea of reaching an agreement with Rome and that the Motu Propio allowing broader use of the traditional Latin Mass would lead to an agreement between his group and the Holy See.

In a letter to the faithful of the SSPX, Fellay said the publication of the motu propio is “clear sign of his good will towards us,” and that therefore, “there would be nothing left for the Society to do but to ‘sign an agreement with Rome.’ Unfortunately, a few of our friends were deceived by such an illusion.”  “Basically, nothing has really changed except for the motu proprio’s liturgical Overture,” Fellay asserted.

He went on to discuss his understanding of the terms “heretic” and “schismatic” in the wake of Vatican II, saying these words “used to designate the religions closer to the Catholic Church” but have now “disappeared, except when they are occasionally employed, especially the term ‘schismatic,’ to label us.”

“The same holds true for the term ‘excommunication’,” Fellay said.  “The new approach is called ecumenism, and contrary to what everyone used to think, it does not mean a return to Catholic unity, but rather the establishment of a new kind of unity that no longer requires conversion.

Fellay went on to say, “The motu proprio that introduces the hope of a change for the better in matters liturgical is not accompanied by the logically related measures that should follow in other domains of the Church’s life.”

“We must conclude that nothing has changed in Rome’s intention to pursue the conciliar course despite forty years of crisis, despite vacant convents, abandoned rectories, and empty churches,” Fellay charged, adding that “Catholic universities persist in their divagations, and the teaching of the catechism is uncertain while Catholic schools are no longer specifically Catholic: they have become an extinct species...”

Fellay said the SSPX “definitely rejoices at the pope’s desire to reintroduce the ancient and venerable rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, yet it also observes the opposition— sometimes very tenacious—of entire bishops’ conferences. Without giving up hope and without impatience, we can see that the time for an agreement has not yet come.”

Imprimir Incrementar tamaño de fuente Disminuir tamaño de fuente
Subscriber comments:
Published by: John
Belgium 06/27/2008 03:20 PM EST
You can't solve a 20 years-during problem by an 'ultimatum' and after a little discussion. Rome and the FSSPX must talk a longer time. Even when mgr Fellay is right he can reach more in full communion with Rome like the Fraternity of St Peter.How is it possible that all this men of God who share the same faith can't obtain communion ?
Published by: Guy D.
Chicago, Illinois 04/28/2008 12:01 PM EST
It is astonding that the St. Pius X Society that claims to be traditionalist is supporting Catholic Doctrine does not understand that only one Pontiff Benedict XVI sits on the chair of Peter. God bless our Holy Father Benedict for his patiance and grace in ministering to disloyal self proclaimed spokesman for the Chruch on both the right and left.
Published by: Sorrowfull
Florida 04/24/2008 11:32 AM EST
Patience.

Fellay is not yet accepting the signing of an agreement with Rome. Rome is Peter and the Apostles, in communion. It seems that he is not yet full communion.

What a responsibility for him as leader.

We have to pray for the unity of the Church. One Lord. One Spirit. One Church.
Published by: Tony
Toronto 04/24/2008 06:54 AM EST
How could Bishop Fellay possibly sign an agreement with Rome after the fiasco with the American visit of the pope - Holy Communion being taken by pro-abortion politicians right under the nose of the pope, a mockery of the Mass, etc. When will this all get punished!

No. No agreement until Rome converts back to the true Faith.
Published by: G. De Feo
Brooklyn, NY, USA 04/24/2008 01:09 AM EST
Perhaps I'm naive, but I feel that the decline in the priesthood and religious life have more to do with the fact that Sacred Scripture says that in these last days men would be lovers of nothing but money and self; it then goes on to list the egregious qualities people would possess. Why is Vatican II being blamed? I think that the council had the unfortunate coincidence of occurring during the whole sixties mess, when so many youth in the West were decrying principles we lived by for centuries. Pope Benedict said that the council's results were not well explained to Catholics. I have so far not read a convincing book or article that convincingly puts the blame squarely on the steps of the Second Vatican Council; seems to me to be circumstantial evidence. And, in poorer countries in Africa, for example, aren't vocations doing better? The "money and self" seems to me to be confined to the West, which makes up a small percentage of the world's population.
Published by: Dean
Kelowna, B.C. 04/23/2008 08:28 PM EST
The S.S.P.X. will be in complete union with Rome as soon as Rome embraces her traditional faith. The Church has always worked for the conversion of Pagans into her fold. Rome is accepting these false religions as legitimate. This has always been and always will be an error. Every Catholic has know their faith. God bless us all.
Published by: Claire VanLeusen
New Bedford MA 04/23/2008 06:26 PM EST
Oh how I agree!!
Ecumenism has been The Vatican's "sideshow"
for over 40 years..Nothing accomplished except useless talks and never ending platitudes! The One True Church of Jesus Christ can never accept heresy!
ADD A COMMENT (Your e-mail will NOT be published):
NAME:
CITY/STATE/COUNTRY:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
 
PLEASE ENTER THE SECURITY CODE DISPLAYED ABOVE:
Chars:
* Thanks for your comments. The number of messages that can be online is limited. Length should not exceed 1500 characters. CNA reserves the right to edit messages for content and tone. Comments and opinions expressed by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of CNA. CNA will not publish comments with abusive language, insults or links to other pages.
ADVERTISING
Place your ad here
Resources:
Columns:
News:
Documents:
Tools:
ACI Group:
ACI Prensa