Jun 12, 2006
By now, everyone has heard the arguments surrounding The Da Vinci Code. This controversial book and movie have been dominating the headlines for months. Everywhere you look, you hear about the book’s factual flaws and how many of the claims made in the book are simply not true. But according to its author, Dan Brown, the book is a work of fiction and has no need to be historically accurate. What, then, is the big commotion being caused by the book, and now, the movie? What is the danger in something that is openly acknowledged to be fictitious? How can a work of fiction pose a threat to Catholics?The answer involves not only what is being said in the novel, but also how it is being said. There is little danger in a fictitious novel if its readers clearly understand that it is fiction. However, The Da Vinci Code mixes fact and fiction in such a way that much of its audience will not be able to distinguish between them. And Dan Brown does little to help inform his readers which claims are true and which he has simply fabricated. Rather, he presents the material in a way that subtly suggests that it is all true, while in fact, most of the story’s central ideas are anything but true. The book makes false claims and makes up evidence to support them. Neither these claims nor their evidence have any basis in truth. But readers who do not realize that the evidence is false may be willing to accept the claims as being fact. In this way, The Da Vinci Code can mislead its readers.

